
- •Discuss the questions in pairs.
- •Complete the set of phrases with one word from the active vocabulary list.
- •4. A) Look through what people say about technology. What question were they asked?
- •3. A) Read the information about cloning and put the pictures in ex. 1 into the right order.
- •Discuss the questions below in pairs.
- •You are going to have the debate about cloning. Work in two groups.
- •6. Have the class debate. Use the words and phrases below and your own ideas.
- •Look at the pictures below. Match the texts to the pictures.
- •Work in pairs. Discuss what the following appliances could do in a smart home.
- •Complete the summary of the radio programme with your own ideas.
- •6. A) What technologies will be used in the smart home of the future? Put the predictions below into the right category.
- •7. A) Work in groups. Prepare to describe your smart home of the future.
- •A) What suffix is needed to form adjectives from the nouns below? Write down the adjectives.
- •Read a page from Sophia Collins' blog. What kind of programme is she producing?
- •4. A) Read some of the questions teenagers asked scientists in "I'm a Scientist, Get me out of Here". Can you answer any of them? Do you think scientists can give the answers to all questions?
- •© A) Listen to the story and follow in the book. Where is Jeff? What kind of device is the Randomiser?
- •Read the story again and answer the questions.
- •3. A) Read some facts about science in Belarus. Is your favourite field of science popular in Belarus?
- •4. Work in small groups. Write a list of tips for someone who would like to become a scientist in Belarus.
like?
of; connected with?
place for?
Read a page from Sophia Collins' blog. What kind of programme is she producing?
By Sophia Collins, producer of the on-line teen science event
"It's hometime but we want to stay and ask questions"
These are the words of a 14-year-old student, at a school in inner-city London. The school has some of the poorest academic results in the school district. And yet a classroom science activity had the students so gripped that when the bell went for the end of the school day, they insisted on staying for another 15 minutes to ask more questions.
The students were having an MSN-style online chat with some scientists. They'd started with fairly simple questions, 'How long have you been a scientist?' and 'Why is the sky blue?'
But then something happens - the immediacy of the chat format, the inventiveness of teenage brains, the unexpected experience of a grown-up seriously answering their questions - and the chat starts getting richer. By the end of the chat this class had moved from a question about whether science could ever stop aging, to discussing what the world would be like if people didn't die.
Live chats like this are part of the event I run, I'm a Scientist, Get me out of Here! The scientists are competing for a prize of £500 to communicate their work and the students are voting who gets it.
One scientist told me that this was "the most science-related fun I've had in ages," while a teacher e-mailed to tell me her class was splitting into fan clubs for the different scientists, "with the sort of devotion they've only had for pop stars up until now."
4. A) Read some of the questions teenagers asked scientists in "I'm a Scientist, Get me out of Here". Can you answer any of them? Do you think scientists can give the answers to all questions?
1. Do you think that there will be another ice age? 2. Can you make a clone of yourself? 3. Why is it impossible for us to imagine a 4D world? 4. What came first, the chicken or the egg? 5. Do you think we will ever find a way to live forever? 6. Why is ice clear and snow white? 7. Why do you think that humans are the only species on Earth to have advanced in technology? 8. What do you guys actually do? 9. Have you ever invented anything or discovered anything new?
b) Match the answers to the questions above.
Is it?! We live in one! Time is the 4th dimension. If you can imagine your house last year, there, you've done it.
I think some great minds have decided the egg must have come first because the chicken must have evolved from some other egg-laying creature slightly different to a chicken. That could be a reptile. Reptiles almost exclusively lay eggs and I think it's still the consensus view that birds evolved from dinosaurs (which were reptiles!).
There's bound to be another ice age at some point - the Earth's climate is always changing. I'm not sure when it will be though; although some people are arguing that the next one could start in just a few years.
Me personally? No - I don't have the expertise. But there are some scientists who claim they can do that. The science and technology are pretty much there to clone humans - the big issues are ethical: Is it right to do this? Many people would say that it isn't - partly because there are issues with how healthy clones are, and partly because cloning brings up very important questions of human rights, and what it actually means to be a person.
I suspect they aren't. Have you seen the Caledonia crows using tools? Various monkeys also use tools for different tasks. I know our technological advancement is much more obvious but other species have advanced too. You might also suggest that they haven't advanced further because we've been holding them back and oppressing them. We certainly seem to act like bullies in our dealings with the natural world.
I think that's to do with how closely packed together the water molecules are. In ice, they're tightly together in a crys- tal-like structure. In snow, there's a lot of little bits of ice just in a kind of pile with lots of air in between; and the air makes it opaque (opposite of clear).
No. Unless you mean by creating digital versions of ourselves that survive after the body has died. We'll probably find a way to live longer, but in the end the laws of physics, chemistry and biology dictate that something that's living can't carry on living indefinitely.
Sleep, party, and have lots of fun...
No, sorry - must have been thinking about something else - that doesn't sound like my life at all!
As a professor at a university, I teach people about new technologies and how to use them safely. I carry out research (usually with other people) into doing stuff as safely and as usefully as possible. I write lots of stuff about new technologies - in boring scientific journals and exciting posts on my blog (I'm kidding - they're probably boring as well). And I look after the day to day running of the Risk Science Centre at the University of Michigan.
I. I "invented" a device for collecting very small particles out of the air to study them, when I was doing my Ph.D. But it was never made into a commercial instrument. I've also discovered lots of things as a scientist but, to be honest, many of these probably seem quite boring. They're like the bricks that make up a grand building - the bricks are important, but not half so impressive as the overall result of lots of them together. Not that I find my work boring of course.
Are the sentences below true or false according to the scientists' answers?
1. Dinosaurs were egg-laying creatures. 2. One of the reasons to ban human cloning is health problems of cloned animals. 3. Molecules in ice are closer to each other than in snow. 4. We're going to live in Ice Age in a few years. 5. Scientists are optimistic about humans living forever. 6. If you imagine something you remember from the past, the picture is going to be 4D. 7. Crows in Caledonia use advanced technologies as tools. 8. The work of scientists isn't fun at all. 9. There are three adjectives with suffix -al in ex. 4b.
a) Analyze the questions teenagers asked in the I'm a scientist programme.
1. How many questions were personal? 2. In which questions did teenagers ask for the scientists' personal opinion? 3. Which questions required specific knowledge to answer them? 4. How many questions did you know the answer to?
b) What questions would you ask if you were participating in the I'm a scientist programme? Write 3 questions you would like to ask a scientist.
7 Role-play the I'm a scientist interview in real life.
Find 3 volunteers to be scientists.
Ask your questions in turns.
Listen to the scientists' answer the questions.
Vote for the best scientists.
LESSON 8. THE RANDOMISER
Communicative area: inferring the meaning from context, describing a picture
Active vocabulary: random, display, flee
You are going to read the science fiction story called The Ran- domiser. What kind of gadget or device could the Randomiser be?
random ['raendam] adj - done without any particular plan or system; irregular; The police were stopping cars at random and checking their brakes-, Choose a number at random. randomly adv - in a random way. at random idiom.
randomise verb - arrange in random order; Randomise the order of the numbers.