
- •1. Morphology and syntax as parts of grammar. Main units of grammar and types of relations between grammatical units in language and speech.
- •1 Syntagmatic relations
- •2 Paradigmatic relations
- •2. Main grammatical notions. Grammatical meaning and grammatical form.
- •Grammatical form
- •2. Grammatical meaning
- •6. Notional and functional classes of words.
- •5. Parts of speech. Principles of classification.
- •1 Principle The Semantic Approach
- •3 Principle The Syntactic (Functional) Approach
- •4 Notional classes of words
- •7. The noun. The category of number.
- •4. Combinability:
- •10. The adjective. The category of degrees of comparison.
- •2. Morphological properties:
- •3. Syntactic properties:
- •3) Absolute superiority or inferiority:
- •9. The noun. The category of article determination.
- •Indefinite
- •Indefinite article
- •3. Structure of words. Types of morphemes.
- •11. The category of tense. Posteriority.
- •12. The category of order / correlation.
- •13. The category of aspect.
- •14. The category of Voice
- •Voice opposition
- •Voice and Syntactic Structure
- •1. The Active construction
- •2 The Passive construction
- •Verbs used in the Passive Voice
- •15. Mood and modality
- •16. Verbals. The category of representation.
- •1. Lexico-grammatical meaning:
- •3. Morphological categories:
- •4. Syntactic functions:
- •23. Complex Sentence.Structural classification.
- •III. Sentences with optional dependent clauses:
- •17. Phrase. Principles of classification.
- •4. Means of form-building.
- •18. Phrase. Types of relations between its constituents.
5. Parts of speech. Principles of classification.
The words of the lang. are divided into gr. classes which differ in formal and semantic features. Traditionally they are called parts of speech (p/of/sp). This term is purely conventional and was introduced in the gr. teaching of Ancient Greece. The problem of the p/of/sp is the most controversial one.
1 Principle The Semantic Approach
It is based on the universal forms of human thought which are reflected in 3 main categorial meanings of words: substance, process, property.
However, this principle is open to criticism; it doesn’t always work; it can be hard to define a categorial meaning of a word e.g. whiteness - is it substance of a noun or property of an adjective? action – it denotes process, but it isn’t a verb 2 Principle The Formal Approach Only form should be used as a criterion for the classification of the p/of/sp. (Henry Sweet) They distinguished between two classes of words: declinable (changeable forms) indeclinable (static forms) articles, prepositions This criterion is also unreliable. It doesn’t take into account the way a word functions in the sentence.
3 Principle The Syntactic (Functional) Approach
Fries. The Structure of English. NY, 1956)
Based on the syntactic distribution of words;
three minimum free utterance test frames (diagnostic frames) to fill the positions with the words under the test;
words that fit into a position without changing the structural meaning of the sentence belong to the same form-class
Classes of words are recognized by their formal devices (morphemes) and the position in the utterance – not their concrete lexical meaning
4 Notional classes of words
Class 1 ~ N + Prn, Num (cardinal);
Class 2 ~ Vb – Aux & Modal;
Class 3 ~ Adj + Prn, N's, Num (ordinal);
Class 4 ~ Adv
154 functional words (individual, unique) arranged in 15 classes. They can be distributed among the three main sets: specifiers of notional words (determiners of nouns, modal verbs, functional modifiers and intensifiers of adjectives and adverbs) interpositional elements, determining the relation of notional words to one another (prepositions and conjunctions) refer to the sentence as a whole (question words, attention-getting words, words of affirmation and negation, sentence introducers (it, there))
3 criteria classification
Vinogradov –> Russian grammar
Smirnitsky, Ilyish –> English grammar
There is a unity of classification criteria:
1. Semantic (lexico-grammatical meaning);
2. Morphological (grammatical categories and derivational patterns);
3. Syntactic (combinability and function)
Typical types of combinability 1) Left-hand ;prepositional connection with another noun or an adj, an adv: an enterance to the house, the turn round the corner; 2) casal combinability characterizes the noun alongside of its prepositional combinability with another noun. (E.g. the speech of the President - the president's speech.)
3)contact combinability (E.g. film festivals, a cannon ball.)
The three criteria applied to notional parts of speech:
NOUN: 1) substance;
2) number & case; derivational suffixes;
3) combinability with A, Prp, Adj, Vb; functions of S, O, C.
ADJ: 1) property of substance;
2) degrees of comparison; derivational suffixes;
3) combinability with N, Adv, Vb; functions of Mn Cs .
VERB: 1) process;
2) tense, voice, aspect, mood, person, number,order; derivational suffixes;
3) combinability with N, Adj, Adv; function of P.
ADV: 1) property of process;
2) degrees of comparison; derivational suffixes;
3) combinability with Vb, Adj, Adv;functions of Mv .
Criteria applied to formal / functional parts of speech
Categorial meaning:
Article — specification of the noun;
Preposition — relations between Ns and other wds;
Conjunction — connection of wds and phrases;
Interjection — expressing emotions;
Particle — specification and limitation of meaning
Syntactic characteristics (combinability)
PRONOUN
Pronouns have no referential meaning. Their lexico-grammatical meaning is deixis — indication, pointing to things and properties.
The morphological and syntactic criteria – are different in different subgroups of pronoun.
Noun pronouns (personal, indefinite, absolute possessive) and adjective pronouns (demonstrative, relative, conjoint possessive, indefinite).