- •4. The far field wake
- •Newtonian Flow Theories:
- •Newtonian flowfield over a flat plate [from Anderson, 2000]
- •Lift and drag predictions derived from Newtonian theory [from Anderson, 2000]
- •Wedge and Conical Flow Methods:
- •Tangent-wedge method [from Anderson, 1989]
- •Tangent-cone method [from Anderson, 1989]
- •Power Law methods:
- •Incompressible isotropic case
- •For anisotropic fluids
Newtonian Flow Theories:
Although he had no knowledge of supersonic or hypersonic flow as such, Isaac Newton was one of the first mathematicians to focus scientific thinking on the fundamental physics of fluid mechanics. In his Principia, published in 1687, Newton proposed that fluid flow consisted of a uniform stream of particles. Should this stream impact on a body, such as the flat plate at an angle of attack a shown below, the normal component of each particle's momentum would be transferred to the plate while the tangential component would be preserved. In this way, the stream of particles would travel along the surface after the collision and be deflected downward, but the particles would have no knowledge of the obstruction until impact.
Newtonian flowfield over a flat plate [from Anderson, 2000]
If Newton had had access to a wind tunnel and some method of flow visualization, he would know that this kind of behavior is incorrect. In actuality, the streamlines passing over a body at subsonic speeds will begin to diverge far upstream of the body, much like water begins to bulge away from the bow of a ship before the ship passes by. However, Newton's analysis is relatively accurate for hypersonic flows because the body moves so quickly that the fluid "cannot see it" before it passes.
Because Newton's approach is such a simple one, it is an attractive method for developing simple relationships to predict the aerodynamic properties of bodies at hypersonic speeds. By comparing the rate of change of momentum resulting from the particles impacting the flat plate with the mass flow rate of the particles as they pass by and the change in the force on the plate, we can solve for the coefficient of pressure (C p) on the body:
Solving for lift and drag relationships is also quite straightforward yielding the following equations for lift coefficient (C L), drag coefficient (C D), and lift-to-drag ratio (L/D):
The aerodynamic predictions derived from Newtonian flow theory are illustrated below.
Lift and drag predictions derived from Newtonian theory [from Anderson, 2000]
From this figure, the following characteristics of hypersonic aerodynamics can be noted:
Lift increases with increasing angle of attack, as would be expected, but the maximum lift coefficient occurs at an angle of attack of nearly 55°. This is remarkable since C L max for subsonic bodies typically occurs between 10° and 20°. However, this high angle is realistic for practical hypersonic vehicles.
The lift coefficient at low angles of attack (less than 15°) is very nonlinear, in contrast to typical subsonic behavior.
The lift-to-drag ratio is maximum at very low angles of attack. Note that L/D would go to infinity as angle of attack goes to 0° if not for the influence of skin friction.
In addition to "pure" Newtonian theory, many have proposed corrections and modifications to account for various phenomena ignored in the classical approach.
Wedge and Conical Flow Methods:
Another relatively simple hypersonic flow analysis technique is an approximate method based on equating the body of interest with a two-dimensional wedge. The flowfield is determined by constructing a wedge tangent to a given point on the body of interest and assuming that the properties at that point on the wedge are the same as those at the same point on the original body:
