- •Syllabus
- •Branch: 0905 “Power Engineering”
- •Home Work – 1 (7 Semester)
- •Contents
- •2.2.3. Individual work…………………………………………………….……...8
- •Introduction
- •1. Reference notes
- •1.1. Aim of the discipline
- •1.2. Tasks for learning the discipline
- •1.3. Discipline status in the system of professional training
- •1.4. Integrated requirements for learning outcomes on the discipline
- •1.5. Integrated requirements for learning outcomes on modules
- •1.6. Interconnection with other disciplines
- •2. Discipline content
- •2.1. Topical plan of the discipline
- •2.2. Development of didactic process for types of classes
- •2.2.1. Lectures, their amount and themes
- •2.2.2. Practical classes, their themes and volume
- •2.2.3. Individual work
- •2.2.4. Self-studying work of students: themes and time amount
- •2.2.4.1. Home Work
- •3. Methodological guides and teaching materials on the discipline
- •3.1. Basic and additional literature
- •3.2. List of visual materials and other training materials
- •4. Students’ knowledge and skills grading system
- •4.1. Basic Terms, Concepts, Definitions
- •4.2. Grading Scale for Students’ Learning
NATIONAL AVIATION UNIVERSITY
Airspace Institute
Mechanics and Power Engineering Faculty
Aeroengines Department
Index: Р 01-8.090522-a-29
“APPROVED”
Deputy Rector for Academics
_______________A.Polukhin
“_____”______________2011
Syllabus
of the discipline
“Thermal measurement and instruments”
(according to ECTS)
Branch: 0905 “Power Engineering”
Specialty : 6.090500 “Gas Turbine Plants and Compressor Stations”
Year – 4 Semester 7
Lectures – 17
Laboratory classes – 34 Exam – 7 semester
Self study – 76
Individual work – 8
Total – 135
Home Work – 1 (7 Semester)
Kyiv 2011
Syllabus is based on the Curriculum № РБ-1-522-a/01, Branch: 0905 "Power Engineering", Specialty : 6.090500 “Gas Turbine Plants and Compressor Stations”, Academic Program of the discipline “Thermal measurement and instruments”, index Н-1-8090522-29, re-approved 25.09.2002, “Provisional Regulations on Training according to ECTS (within the pedagogical experiment)” and “Provisional Regulations on the Assessment grading system” approved by the Rector of the University (order № 122\од of 15.06.2004).
Developed by:
Senior Teacher of Aeroengines Department
_______________ A. Voznyuk
Discussed at the meeting of Aeroengines Department,
Minutes № ___ of ________ 20__.
Head of the Department ________________ М. Кulyk
The Syllabus has been discussed and approved by the Scientific – Methodological – Editorial Board of the Airspace Institute, Minutes № __ of _____ 20__.
Head of the SMEB ________________ M.Kindrachuk
“APPROVED”
Dean of the Mechanics and
Power Engineering Faculty
___________ A. Samkov
_________________2011
Contents
Introduction …………………………………………………………………..4
1. Reference notes ………………………………………………….………….4
1.1.Aim of the discipline …………………………………………….………...4
1.2. Tasks for learning the discipline …………………………………..……….4
1.3. Discipline status in the system of professional training ………..…………...4
.
1.4. Integrated requirements for learning outcomes on the discipline……….…...5
1.5. Integrated requirements for learning outcomes on modules ………………..5
1.6. Interconnection with other disciplines ……………………………………...6
2. Discipline content ……...........................................................……….......... 6
2.1. Topical plan of the discipline………………………………………….…….6
2.2. Development of didactic process for types of classes………………..…….7
2.2.1. Lectures, their amount and themes …………………………………..……7
2.2.2. Practical classes, their themes and volume ………………....………..……8
2.2.3. Individual work…………………………………………………….……...8
2.2.4. Self studying and testing …………………………………………….……9
..
2.2.4.1. Home Work ……………………………………………………….…. 10
3. Methodological guides and teaching materials on the discipline …….…..10
3.1. Basic and additional literature ……………………………………………...10
3.2. List of visual materials and other training materials ………………….…..11
4. Students’ knowledge and skills grading system ………………………… 11
4.1. Basic terms, concepts, definitions ……………………………………….…11
.
4.2. Grading scale for students’ learning outcomes assessment ..……......……12