Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
anglysky_dlya_yuristov.doc
Скачиваний:
5
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
1.54 Mб
Скачать

Is justice greedy?

It's hardly news that lawyers' fees are high! As the system's gatekeepers, lawyers place a charge on access to justice which is beyond the reach of many. Critics accuse lawyers of making legal services an expensive luxury, and they challenge lawyers to re-think the way their services are provided and priced. In particular, there is an idea to stop billing by the hour and start charging by the case. Another initiative is that there is a need for ceilings, instead of an open-sky practice.

Criticism of lawyers' fees is almost as old as the profession itself and the present situation are no worse than before. But public tolerance has changed. Imagine if airlines charged on the same basis as lawyers: an hourly fee, with no guarantees of any limit and the price escalating as delays, bad weather and mechanical failures occurred.

What is to be done? Can the profession set its own house in order? The problem is not so much high fees in themselves; there's nothing wrong with charging a rich tariff to those who can afford it. After all, it is said, lawyers are selling a valuable commodity and are entitled to expect top-dollar remuneration.

But lawyers, unlike bankers, are not just another sector of the business world. They have great sway over a legal system supposedly committed to social justice. And it is one of that system's virtues that justice is not for sale to the highest bidder. As long as lawyers are beyond the pocket of most citizens, it means social injustice!!!

Sadly, the legal profession too easily mistakes its own interests for those of the public. Allowing paralegals and others to offer more legal services might be a good start. A more practical, effective solution would be to let lawyers retain their monopoly, but only on the condition that they truly serve the public. This means that there must be more citizens and clients involved in running the profession, that lawyers must be answerable to someone other than themselves, that they should pay for their monopolistic privilege by contributing a share of their fees to funding legal services for poorer litigants, and that fees should be regulated for price as well as quality.

As long as access to justice depends on access to lawyers, society must oblige the legal profession to meet its public responsibilities – the leading one being that legal services must be genuinely available to all.

Allan C. Hutchinson, (teaches law at Osgoode Hall at York University)

The changing face of the monarchy

The royal family has undoubtedly learned the lessons of Diana, her direct physical approach to her public. The Queen smiles a great deal more in public than she used to do. Still she’s reluctant to the efforts of some recently appointed courtiers to mould her image and to make her a “touchy-feely” monarch.

In Britain the monarchy has not always been popular. For many years there were growing republican sentiments. During the reign of Elizabeth II the royal family has undergone considerable changes. The public has become much more informed about the lives of the royal family due to in-depth press coverage. Two of Queen Elizabeth's sons, Prince Charles and Prince Andrew, separated from their wives; both separations occurred amid a flurry of international news. These separations were surrounded by accusations of infidelity and along with the subsequent death of princess Diana damaged the reputation of the royal family. But The Queen seems to have succeeded in making up for all these bad moments.

The personality and family image of The Queen serve to remove the negative feeling. In 1992 The Queen and Prince Charles agreed to pay taxes on their personal income, the first time the monarchy has done so.

The Queen has always been a roving ambassador for Britain, and if we calculate the increase in trade after a royal visit abroad, the nation probably makes a profit from her activities, and that does not take into account the income from tourism in Britain generated by the monarchy and great state events such as royal weddings.

In the spring of 1997, Her Majesty Elizabeth II launched the first official royal Web site, with 150 pages of history, information, and trivia. There is a "visitor's page," where both fans and critics of the Crown can voice their opinions about the Web site, comment on matters such as Prince Charles's relationship with Camilla Parker Bowles, and express their grief over Diana's tragic death. The site includes colour pictures of royal residences, historical tidbits, and even details about royal finances. Buckingham Palace claims it's the royal family's way of "making the monarchy more accessible". (taken from http://www.just-english.ru/advanced.htm)

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]