
- •Lecture 5 - abridged
- •Stylistic semasiology
- •1. An angry person
- •2. Heated fluid in a container
- •The transfer of a name on the basis of:
- •Types of semantic relationships:
- •Types of hyperbole
- •Metonymical group
- •Types of metonymy
- •2. Stylistic/expressive/contextual
- •Is used:
- •Varieties of metonymy
- •1. Traditional / dictionary / periphrastic / language periphrasis:
- •Typology:
- •I. Semantically
Lecture 5 - abridged
Stylistic semasiology
Lexical semasiology
Stylistic semasiology
ways of creating additional meanings:
1. unusual denotative reference of words, w/c, utterances (different ways of secondary nomination) = tropes
2. unusual distribution of meanings of these units = figures of speech
1. Secondary nomination = transfer of names from one object to another
trope - a coincidence of two semantic planes (two different meanings) in one unit of form (word / phrase / sentence)
“She blew her lid.”
1. An angry person
2. Heated fluid in a container
leg of a table
neck of a bottle
foot of a hill
hand of a clock = “etymological tropes” / dead tropes - devoid of stylistic meaning Lexicology
trope creates the image
Then Night, like some great loving mother, gently lays her hand on our fevered head, and turns our tear-stained faces up to her and smiles (J.K.Jerome)
tropes - renaming
Yu. Skrebnev - paradigmatic semasiology = figures of replacement
A. Morokhovsky - semasilological EM = figures of substitution
The transfer of a name on the basis of:
1. contiguity / a real connection / logical relations /associations between different objects:
the blue coat = the policeman
I was followed by a pair of heavy boots.
2. similarity / affinity / likeness (real or imaginary) of two objects: the rat = the spy
The reception was cold.
3. difference of two meanings or transfer by contrast when the two objects are opposed: You are so punctual!
A fine friend you are!
A common quantitative feature = figures of quantity (Yu. Screbnev and A. Morokhovsky )
I’d give worlds for it!
I can do the job in a second!
1. EM / tropes = different ways of secondary nomination
2. SD / figures of speech = unusual distribution of meanings of units
Yu. Screbnev - “figures of co-occurrence”,
A.Morokhovsky - “figures of combination”
Types of semantic relationships:
1. identical
My heart is like a singing bird. (Rosetti)
2. opposite
His fees were high, his lessons were light. (O’Henry)
3. different
She dropped a tear and her handkerchief. (Dickens)
Hyperbole = overstatement / exaggeration / intensification of any feature of the object / an expression of emotional evaluation
The coffee shop smell was strong enough to build a garage on. (R. Chandler)
- is not intended to be understood literally
Types of hyperbole
1. trite
I could see my mother going in Spaulding’s and asking the salesman a million dopey questions. (J. Salinger)
He was scared to death
I’ve told you fifty times
I beg a thousand pardons
Я вас чекав цілу вічність!
2. genuine
His grey face was so long that he could wind it twice round his neck (R. Chandler)
“Marlowe? We’d like to see you here, in the office.” “Right away”” “Or sooner.” (R. Chandler) А сома… Сома мені самому доводилось бачити такого завбільшки, як комбайн! Тільки трохи довшого.
is used:
-to express the intensity of strong feelings
Meiosis = understatement / underestimating / diminishing of the features of the object in order to emphasise its insignificance
He was a skinny little guy with wrists as big as pencils. (J. Salinger)
meiotic devices = “downtoners”
I was half-afraid you had forgotten me.
I kind of liked it. I am not quite too late.
Зачекайте хвилинку.
Litotes - an affirmative statement in the form of negation
Love overcomes no small things = great
He was no coward =
He is not uncultured =
interplay of negative and affirmative meanings
Cramer and I regarded him not without pity. (R. Stout)
Ви обурені і не без причин.
is used:
-to weaken positive characteristics of an object
-to express doubt/uncertainty as to the value or significance of the object described