- •5) Origin and evolution of political parties in Kazakhstan.
- •9) Pressure groups. Business groups in politics. Corporation.
- •10) Political participation in Kazakhstan.
- •12)Forms of participation in Kazakhstan.
- •Voting behavior types
- •17) Western Polyarchy as modern democracy.
- •18)Economic, social and political preconditions of democracy.
- •19) Stages of democratic transitions.
- •In the arena of social policy it may refer to a relaxation of laws restricting for example divorce, abortion, or drugs
- •In the arena of civil rights policy it may refer to the elimination of laws prohibiting same-sex sexual relations, same-sex marriage, interracial marriage, or interfaith marriage
- •21) Democratisation and globalisation.
- •30) Compare last elections into Majilis 2007 and 2012. What are the strengths and weaknesses?
- •107 Deputies of the Majilis will be elected in two stages:
- •In 2007, 337 members of the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan participated in the elections of deputies from the Assembly.
- •31) Explain why the party “Nur Otan” is dominating in Kazakhstan party system? What is the role of other political parties in it?
- •32.Changes and reforms in the political system of independent states of Central Asia and Kazakhstan.
- •It can be summed up as “the state is a collection of human beings occupying a definite territory under an organised government d is subject to no outside control.”
- •(1) Population
- •(4) Sovereignty
- •35. Globalization, its perspectives and problems, positive and negative sides. Anti-globalist movements.
- •36. International relations: essence, main stages, conceptions and basic tendencies.
- •List of international organization leaders in 2013
- •International Atomic Energy Agency Director-General - Yukiya Amano, Japan (2009–present)
- •International Civil Aviation Organization President of the Council - Roberto Kobeh Gonzalez, Mexico (2006–present) Secretary-General - Raymond Benjamin, France (2009–present)
- •International Labour Organization Director-General - Guy Ryder, uk (2012–present)
- •38. Main global problems of the modernity.
- •[Edit]Subfields
- •International relations
- •41. Explane difference between ethnic identity and civic identity. How do you understand national identity?
- •42. What is the difference between self government and local government?
- •Local government
- •43. What is the diference between federation and confederation?
- •Comparison chart
- •44)Basic actors of political relations, their essence and classification.
- •45)Explane difference between ethnic identity and civic identity. How do you understand national identity?
- •46)What is the difference between self- government and local government?
- •47)What is the diference between federation and confederation?
[Edit]Subfields
Most political scientists work broadly in one or more of the following five areas:
Comparative politics, including area studies
International relations
Political philosophy
Public administration
Public law
Some political science departments also classify methodology as well as scholarship on the domestic politics of a particular country as distinct sub fields. In the United States, American politics is often treated as a separate subfield.
In contrast to this traditional classification, some academic departments organize scholarship into thematic categories, including political philosophy, political behavior (including public opinion, collective action, and identity), and political institutions (includinglegislatures and international organizations). Political science conferences and journals often emphasize scholarship in more specific categories. The American Political Science Association, for example, has 42 organized sections that address various methods and topics of political inquiry.
41. Explane difference between ethnic identity and civic identity. How do you understand national identity?
Definitions of ethnic identity vary according to the underlying theory embraced by researchers’ and scholars’ intent on resolving its conceptual meanings. The fact that there is no widely agreed upon definition of ethnic identity is indicative of the confusion surrounding the topic. Typically, ethnic identity is an affiliative construct, where an individual is viewed by themselves and by others as belonging to a particular ethnic or cultural group. An individual can choose to associate with a group especially if other choices are available (i.e., the person is of mixed ethnic or racial heritage). Affiliation can be influenced by racial, natal, symbolic, and cultural factors (Cheung, 1993). Racial factors involve the use of physiognomic and physical characteristics, natal factors refer to "homeland" (ancestral home) or origins of individuals, their parents and kin, and symbolic factors include those factors that typify or exemplify an ethnic group (e.g., holidays, foods, clothing, artifacts, etc.). Symbolic ethnic identity usually implies that individuals choose their identity, however to some extent the cultural elements of the ethnic or racial group have a modest influence on their behavior . Ethnic identity is usually contextual and situational because it derives from social negotiations where one declares an ethnic identity and then demonstrates acceptable and acknowledged ethnic group markers to others. One’s ethnic declaration often is open to the scrutiny of others who may validate or invalidate the declaration. Ethnic declarations embody an ethnic consciousness that is closely aligned with the cultural elements of the ethnic group with which they affiliate. The ultimate form of one’s ethnic consciousness is the genuine association of one’s personal identification with a communal one. Thus it is logical to assume that a concordance would exist between personal identity and an outsider's sense of identity where the importance is placed on one's own categories and intention of self-identification. To promote the union between self and other, individuals often will use ethnological speech patterns and gestures to promote the authenticity of their claim. If outward physical appearances do not mesh with the standard physical criteria or there is the sense that others doubt the identity claim ethnic actors will tend to exaggerate and give emphasis to mannerisms and speech idiosyncrasies known to be particular and specific to the reference group. This ritual or stylistic emphasis frequently occurs, too, when ethnic group members meet or gather in geographic areas that differ from their homelands or communities of common origin. The distinctive ritual is a prime example of situational ethnicity and situated ethnic identity.
Nationality refers to our citizenship -- in other words, the nation we are a member of. · Ethnicity, or ethnic identity, refers to membership in a particular cultural group. It is defined by shared cultural practises, including but not limited to holidays, food, language, and customs. · People can share the same nationality but have different ethnic groups. For example, citizens of the United States are of many different ethnic backgrounds. · People who share an ethnic identity can be of different nationalities. Turkish citizens of Turkey and Turkish citizens in Germany share an ethnic identity but are of different nationalities.
Ethnic identity is basically about what culture your ancestors came from. Do you consider yourself English, Irish, Italian, German, Mexican, Chinese or other. Ethnic identity is about food, music, sometimes religion. Do you observe Dio de los Muertos or Hanukkah - or both? Does your grandmother make dim sum or ravioli? Civic identityis your citizenship and the nation in which you now live. Do you participate in school activities or charitable ventures? Are you aware of what's going on in government? Do you plan to register to vote? Do you plan to join the military? What does it mean to you to be American (or whichever nationality you are). Ethnicity is about culture. Civic identity is about how you see yourself in the world
The understanding of ethnicity as primordial has prevailed among the people of the former Yugoslavia. The Yugoslav identification was always present as a more "broader" identification for those who wanted to escape the narrow ethnic identification. The main argument of the article is that with the dissolution of the Yugoslav state the new functional equivalent to the Yugoslav identification is emerging in the form of the "civic identity". This new civic identification allows people to express their distance from the narrow ethnic identification and the intense ethnic revival characterizing the first post-communist phase. In order to empirically substantiate the argument we used the 1995 World Value Survey data from Croatia.
National identity is the person's identity and sense of belonging to one state or to one nation, a feeling one shares with a group of people, regardless of one's citizenship status.
National identity is not an inborn trait; various studies have shown that a person's national identity is a direct result of the presence of elements from the "common points" in people's daily lives:national symbols, language, national colours, the nation's history, national consciousness, blood ties, culture, music, cuisine, radio, television, etc.[citation needed]
The national identity of most citizens of one state or one nation tends to strengthen when the country or the nation is threatened militarily. The sense of belonging to the nation is essential as an external threat becomes clearer when individuals seek to unite with fellow countrymen to protect themselves and fight against the common threat
