- •Improved Technology in Transportation and Telecommunications
- •Is Globalization a Good Thing?
- •Democracies
- •Republics
- •Dynastic Governments
- •Authoritarian and Totalitarian Regimes
- •Rare or Archaic Systems
- •Theoretical Systems
- •Overview
- •[Edit]Anthropological forms of political systems
- •[Edit]Political parties in political systems
- •[Edit]American political parties (democracy/republic)
- •[Edit]Sociology of political systems
- •The Origins of Totalitarianism
- •History
- •Final section
- •Reception
- •Characteristics
- •Enemies of Civil Society
- •Political science Etymology
- •Classifying government
- •Impact [edit]Intended effects
- •[Edit]Unintended effects
- •[Edit]Policy cycle
- •[Edit]Content
- •[Edit]Typologies
- •[Edit]Types
- •Other uses of the term
- •Sources
- •[Edit]Tactics
- •[Edit]Balance of power
- •[Edit]Psychological research
- •[Edit]Empathy gap
- •[Edit]Past research
- •[Edit]Power and control in abusive relationships
- •[Edit]Theories [edit]Five bases of power
- •[Edit]Legitimate power
- •[Edit]Referent power
- •[Edit]Expert power
- •[Edit]Reward power
- •[Edit]Coercive power
- •[Edit]Rational choice framework
- •[Edit]Marxism
- •[Edit]Toffler
- •[Edit]Gene Sharp
- •[Edit]Björn Kraus
- •[Edit]Unmarked categories
- •[Edit]Counterpower
- •Problems with representation
- •Other theories
- •Two concepts of freedom
- •Political individualism
- •Concept of justice
- •Other uses
- •Presidents in democratic countries
- •44Separation of powers theory
- •45Concept of democracy
- •46Concept of regionalism
Reception
Le Monde placed the book among the 100 best books of any kind of the 20th century, while the National Review ranked it #15 on its list of the 100 best non-fiction books of the century.[2] TheIntercollegiate Studies Institute listed it among the 50 best non-fiction books of the century.[3] The book made a major impact on Norman Podhoretz, who compared the pleasure of reading it to that of reading a great poem or novel.[4]
15. Authoritarian regimes.
Authoritarianism is a form of social organization characterized by submission to authority as well as the administration of said authority. In politics, an authoritarian government is one in which political authority is concentrated in a small group of politicians.
Characteristics
Authoritarianism is characterized by highly concentrated and centralized power maintained by political repression and the exclusion of potential challengers. It uses political parties and mass organizations to mobilize people around the goals of the regime.[2]
Authoritarianism emphasizes arbitrary law rather than the rule of law, it often includes election rigging, political decisions being made by a select group of officials behind closed doors, a bureaucracy that sometimes operates independently of rules,[dubious – discuss] which does not properly supervise elected officials, and fails to serve the concerns of the constituencies they purportedly serve. Authoritarianism also tends to embrace the informal and unregulated exercise of political power, a leadership that is "self-appointed and even if elected cannot be displaced by citizens' free choice among competitors," the arbitrary deprivation of civil liberties, and little tolerance for meaningful opposition.[2]
A range of social controls also attempt to stifle civil society, while political stability is maintained by control over and support of the armed forces, a bureaucracy staffed by the regime, and creation of allegiance through various means of socialization and indoctrination.[2]
Authoritarian political systems may be weakened through "inadequate performance to demands of the people."[2] Vestal writes that the tendency to respond to challenges to authoritarianism through tighter control instead of adaptation is a significant weakness, and that this overly rigid approach fails to "adapt to changes or to accommodate growing demands on the part of the populace or even groups within the system."[2] Because the legitimacy of the state is dependent on performance, authoritarian states that fail to adapt may collapse.[2]
Authoritarianism is marked by "indefinite political tenure" of the ruler or ruling party (often in a single-party state) or other authority.[2] The transition from an authoritarian system to a more democratic form of government is referred to as democratization.[2]
John Duckitt of the University of the Witwatersrand suggests a link between authoritarianism and collectivism, asserting that both stand in opposition toindividualism.[3] Duckitt writes that both authoritarianism and collectivism submerge individual rights and goals to group goals, expectations and conformities.[4]Others argue that collectivism, properly defined, has a basis of consensus decision-making, the opposite of authoritarianism.
16. Open the meaning of civil society.
The meaning of the term civil society is contested. It is sometimes considered to include the family and the private sphere, and referred to as the "third sector" of society, distinct from government and business.[1] Dictionary.com's 21st Century Lexicon defines civil society as 1) the aggregate of non-governmental organizations and institutions that manifest interests and will of citizens or 2) individuals and organizations in a society which are independent of the government.[2] Sometimes the term is used in the more general sense of "the elements such as freedom of speech, an independent judiciary, etc, that make up a democratic society" (Collins English Dictionary).[3]
The term entered public discourse in the United States and around the world in the 1990s in effect of intensive work of communist propaganda in Poland.[4][5]However its tradition is much richer and longstanding.
Volunteering is often considered a defining characteristic of the organizations that constitute civil society, which in turn are often called NGOs, or NPOs. Most authorities have in mind the realm of public participation in voluntary associations, trade unions and the like,[6] but it is not necessary to belong to all of these to be a part of civil society.
