
- •Introduction
- •Intended learning outcomes
- •1. Basic concepts of elt methodology:
- •2. A Historical Overview of Early Methods
- •The Grammar-Translation Method
- •Objectives
- •Key Features
- •Typical Techniques
- •Comments
- •Reform Movements and the Direct Method
- •Comments
- •Disadvantages of Direct Method
- •3. Contributions of Other Disciplines
- •4. Approaches to Learning and Motivation in Foreign Language education
- •Inquiry as an example of constructivist teaching:
- •1.5. Conceptions of Foreign Language Teaching
- •Science-Research Conceptions
- •Theory-Philosophy Conceptions
- •Values-based approaches
- •The Essential Skills of Teaching
- •Values-based approaches:
- •Section II- Analyzing Methods of foreign language teaching
- •Objectives
- •Key Features
- •Comments
- •The Silent Way (c. Gattegno) Background
- •Involve me and I learn.
- •Approach
- •The syllabus
- •Learner roles
- •Procedure
- •Community Language Learning (Charles Curran) Background
- •Approach
- •Theory of learning
- •Objectives
- •Key Features
- •Typical Techniques
- •Objectives
- •The syllabus
- •Learner roles
- •Teacher roles
- •Procedure
- •Conclusion
- •(G. Lozanov)
- •Major Concepts and Features
- •1. Mental Reserve Capacities (mrc)
- •2. Psychological “Set-Up”
- •3. Suggestion
- •4. Anti-Suggestive Barriers
- •5. Means of Suggestion
- •Infantilization
- •Intonation
- •Total Physical Response (tpr) (j. Asher) Background
- •Approach
- •1. The Bio Program
- •2. Brain Lateralization
- •3. Reduction of Stress
- •Types of learning and teaching activities
- •Procedure
- •Conclusion
- •The Natural Approach (Krashen & Terrell) Background
- •Approach
- •Theory of language
- •The natural order hypothesis
- •Objectives
- •The syllabus
- •Types of learning and teaching activities
- •Learner roles
- •Procedure
- •Conclusion
- •1. Communicative Approach (Communicative Language Teaching) Background
- •Approach
- •Teacher roles
- •The role of instructional materials
- •Conclusion
- •2. Eclectic Approach
Conclusion
Community Language Learning is the most responsive of the methods we have reviewed in terms of its sensitivity to learned communicative intent. It should be noted, however, that this communicative intent is constrained by the number and knowledge of fellow learners. A learner's desire to understand or express technical terms used in aeronautical engineering is unlikely to receive adequate response ill the CLL class. Community Language Learning places unusual demands on language teachers. They must be highly proficient and sensitive to nuance in both L1 and L2. They must be familiar with and sympathetic to the role of counselors in psychological counseling. They must resist the pressure "to teach" in the traditional senses. As one CLL teacher notes, "I had to relax completely and to exclude my own will to produce something myself. I had to exclude any function of forming or formulating something within me, not trying to do something"(Curran 1976: 33).
The teacher must also be relatively nondirective and must be prepared to accept and even encourage the "adolescent" aggression of the learner as he or she strives for independence. The teacher must operate without conventional materials, depending on student topics to shape and motivate the class. In addition, the teacher must be prepared to deal with potentially hostile learner reactions to the method. The teacher must also be culturally sensitive and prepared to redesign tile language class into more culturally compatible organizational forms. And the teacher must attempt to learn these new roles and skills without much specific guidance from CLL texts presently available. Special framing in Community Language Learning techniques is usually required.
Critics of Community Language Learning question the appropriateness of the counseling metaphor upon which it is predated, asking for evidence that language learning ;in classrooms indeed parallels the processes that characterize psychological counseling. Questions also arise about whether teachers should attempt counseling without special training. CLL procedures were largely developed and tested with groups of college-age Americans. The problems and successes experienced by one or two different client groups may not necessarily represent language learning universals. Other concerns have been expressed regarding the lack of a syllabus, which makes objectives unclear and evaluation difficult to accomplish, and the focus on fluency rather than accuracy, which may lead to inadequate control of the grammatical system of the target language. Supporters of CLL, on the other hand, emphasize the positive benefits of a method that centers on the learner and, stresses the humanistic side of language learning, and not merely its linguistic dimensions.
De-suggestopedia
(G. Lozanov)
Dr.Georgi Lozanov of the Institute of Suggestology in Sofia, Bulgaria is, together with his colleagues, the originator of these techniques. SUGGESTOLOGY is the study of the power of suggestion which can be verbal, non-verbal, conscious or unconscious.
What is De-suggestopedia?
We are constantly, surrounded by suggestive influences. If we study them and become aware of them, then we are in a better position to “choose” which ones we want to influence us. Lozanov maintains that a suggestopedic teacher spends most of the time de-suggesting the students, i.e., freeing them from any nonfacilitating influences from their past. From birth on we are influenced by parents, friends, teachers, society, the media, the weather, the food we eat and the political environment in which we live.
SUGGESTOPEDIA is the study of these suggestive factors in a learning situation.
It is an approach to education whose primary objective is to tap the extraordinary reserve capacities we all possess but rarely if ever use. This method utilises techniques from many sources of research into how best we can learn. The Bulgarian scientist, Dr. Georgi Lozanov, for example, has demonstrated that through a carefully “orchestrated” learning environment including most importantly a specially-trained teacher, the learning process can be accelerated by a factor of three to ten times enjoyably. Such results are possible through the proper use of suggestion. The suggestive-desuggestive process allows students to go beyond previously held beliefs and self-limiting concepts concerning the learning process and learn great quantities of material with ease and enjoyment.
Sources, History, Initial Results
The artful use of suggestion as a means of facilitating the learning and communication process is, of course, and has always been, a part of nearly all effective teaching and persuasive communication. Not until the past twenty years, however, has the phenomenon of suggestion begun to be methodically researched and tested as to how it can and does affect learning. At the centre of these developments is the work of Lozanov. For more than 20 years he has been experimenting with accellerative approaches to learning, has founded the Institute of Suggestology in Sofia, Bulgaria and has authored the book: Suggestology and the Outlines or Suggestopedia (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1997).
In his early research Lozanov investigated individual cases of extraordinary learning capacities etc., and theorised that such capacities were learnable and teachable. He experimented with a wide range of techniques drawn from both traditional and esoteric sources, including hypnosis and yoga, and was able to accelerate the learning process quite dramatically.
Well aware that methods directly involving yoga and hypnosis were not generally applicable or acceptable, he continued seeking universally acceptable means to tap the vast mental reserve capacities of the human mind we all have but which are rarely used. Suggestion proved to be the key.
Applications in the public schools have been impressive: eighteen schools in Bulgaria offered all subjects under Lozano’s supervision, and the results have been that children have learned the same amount of material as in control groups in less than half the time and with more enjoyment and less stress.