- •2. Speak on the Inherent Categories of the English Noun (number)
- •3. Speak on the Inherent Categories of the English (gender )
- •5. Speak on the differencialed plural according to Otto Jespersen
- •6. Speak on: o. Jespersens theory of three ranks
- •7. Speak on: the classification of words into groups according to Henry Sweet
- •8. Speak on the parts of speech classification on the line of Traditional grammar
- •9. Speak on The interface of Morphology with other Linguistic modules
- •12. The General characteristics of the functional parts of speech (adverb prepositions interjection)
- •13. The Parsing of the English Noun.
- •14.The parsing of the English verb
- •15.The category of Tense of the English verb.
- •16. The problem of the Future Tense.
- •17.The Inherent category of mood in English
- •18.The sunjunctive mood in English
- •19.Free and bound morphemes
- •21.The parsing of the English verb
- •23.Speak on: Classification of Morphemes according to m.Y.Blokh p.P. 27-37
- •24. The Grammatical classes of the word.
- •25. Classification of morphemes according to l. Bloomfield.
- •26. Сlassification of morphemes according to the structure.
- •27. Haplology :support your answer with examples
- •28. Speak on The difference between Morphemes, Morphs and Allomorphs.(examples)
- •30 Speak on Is Morphology necessary? What are the properties of Morphology that set it apart from Syntax?
- •31) The object of Syntax
- •33)The classification of the simple sentences according to the structure
- •34)The classification of the simple sentences according to the purpose of utterance (Declaration,Interroga tise,Imperetive, Exclamative and their types)
- •35.Ways of forming guestions in the English language
- •36.Elementary structures in English and their peculiarities
- •37. Otto Jespersen grammatical studies of Phrase structure
- •38.M.Y.Blokh`s theory of English phrases
- •39.The paradigmatic structure of Simple Santences
- •40.Speak on: the problem of the imperative sentence (directives)
- •Imperatives with a subject
- •41.The major and minor elements of the english sentence „
- •42.The complex sentence: types of clauses problems
- •44.The role of conjunctions in forming the composite sentence.
- •45.The types of conjunctions according to Halliday m.A.K.
- •46. Elliptical construction and the problems.
- •47. The problem of the number of principal and secondary parts of the sentences.
- •49. The head-first-head last approach to the phrase structure.
- •50. Marked and unmarked forms of English grammar.
- •51. The system of polarity: support the theory with examples.
- •52. Semantic scope of negation.
- •53.The role of preposition in combining words into sentences.
- •54. The types of the predicate and the ways of its realization. Problems
- •55.The types of the predicate and the ways of its realization.
- •56. The types of attribute and the ways of its realization
- •57. The Rank scale.
- •58. The transactional and interactional functions of a language.
- •59) Extended and unextended sentences in modern English
- •60)The schematic of the English sentence.
14.The parsing of the English verb
In parsing verbs, give the following points:-
(1) Class: (a) as to form,-strong or weak, giving principal parts; (b) as to use,-transitive or intransitive.
(2) Voice,-active or passive.
(3) Mood,-indicative, subjunctive, or imperative.
(4) Tense,-which of the tenses given in Sec. 234.
(5) Person and number, in determining which you must tell-
(6) What the subject is, for the form of the verb may not show the person and number.
15.The category of Tense of the English verb.
The general notion of time and lingual temporality; lexical and grammatical means of time expression. Absolutive and non-absolutive time; relative and factual time. The problem of the two future forms of the verb. The system of two verbal tense categories in English: the category of “absolutive”, “retrospective”, or “primary” time (past vs. non-past) and the category of “relative”, or “prospective” time (future vs. non-future). Oppositional presentation of the two tense categories in interaction. Oppositional reductions of the tense categories. The problem of the auxiliary verbs “shall/will” – “should/would”: the “modal future” vs. the “pure future”; the “voluntary future” vs. the “non-voluntary” future. The first verbal tense category, which can be called “primary time”, “absolutive time”, or “retrospective time”, is expressed by the opposition of the past and the present forms. The suffix “-ed” of the regular verbs is the formal feature which marks the past as the strong member of the opposition. Besides this productive form, there are some unproductive past forms of verbs, such as suppletive forms (e.g.: eat – ate), or past forms homonymous with the present (cut – cut). The marked forms denote past actions which receive retrospective evaluation from the point of view of the moment of speech. The present, like any other weak member of an opposition, has a much wider range of meanings than its strong counterpart: the present denotes actions taking place in the sphere of the present, during the period of time including the moment of speech, e.g.: What are you doing?; Terrorism is the major threat of the twenty first century; it may denote repeated actions, e.g.: We go out every Friday night; actions unchanged in the course of time, e.g.: Two plus two makes four; universal truths, e.g.: He who laughs last laughs best; instantaneous actions which begin and end approximately at the moment of speech (as in sports commentaries), e.g.:Smith passes to Brown; etc. To stress its weak oppositional characteristics the present is also referred to as “non-past”.The second verbal tense category, which may be called “prospective”, or “relative”, is formed by the opposition of the future and the non-future separately in relation to the present or to the past. The strong member of the opposition is the future, marked by the auxiliary verbs shall/will (the future in relation to the present) or should/would (the future in relation to the past). It is used to denote posterior actions, after-actions in relation to some other actions or to a certain point of time in the present or in the past. The two tense categories interact in the lingual presentation of time: any action in English is at first evaluated retrospectively as belonging to the sphere of the past or to the sphere of the present, and then it is evaluated prospectively as an after-action or a non-after-action to either the past or the present.