- •2. Speak on the Inherent Categories of the English Noun (number)
- •3. Speak on the Inherent Categories of the English (gender )
- •5. Speak on the differencialed plural according to Otto Jespersen
- •6. Speak on: o. Jespersens theory of three ranks
- •7. Speak on: the classification of words into groups according to Henry Sweet
- •8. Speak on the parts of speech classification on the line of Traditional grammar
- •9. Speak on The interface of Morphology with other Linguistic modules
- •12. The General characteristics of the functional parts of speech (adverb prepositions interjection)
- •13. The Parsing of the English Noun.
- •14.The parsing of the English verb
- •15.The category of Tense of the English verb.
- •16. The problem of the Future Tense.
- •17.The Inherent category of mood in English
- •18.The sunjunctive mood in English
- •19.Free and bound morphemes
- •21.The parsing of the English verb
- •23.Speak on: Classification of Morphemes according to m.Y.Blokh p.P. 27-37
- •24. The Grammatical classes of the word.
- •25. Classification of morphemes according to l. Bloomfield.
- •26. Сlassification of morphemes according to the structure.
- •27. Haplology :support your answer with examples
- •28. Speak on The difference between Morphemes, Morphs and Allomorphs.(examples)
- •30 Speak on Is Morphology necessary? What are the properties of Morphology that set it apart from Syntax?
- •31) The object of Syntax
- •33)The classification of the simple sentences according to the structure
- •34)The classification of the simple sentences according to the purpose of utterance (Declaration,Interroga tise,Imperetive, Exclamative and their types)
- •35.Ways of forming guestions in the English language
- •36.Elementary structures in English and their peculiarities
- •37. Otto Jespersen grammatical studies of Phrase structure
- •38.M.Y.Blokh`s theory of English phrases
- •39.The paradigmatic structure of Simple Santences
- •40.Speak on: the problem of the imperative sentence (directives)
- •Imperatives with a subject
- •41.The major and minor elements of the english sentence „
- •42.The complex sentence: types of clauses problems
- •44.The role of conjunctions in forming the composite sentence.
- •45.The types of conjunctions according to Halliday m.A.K.
- •46. Elliptical construction and the problems.
- •47. The problem of the number of principal and secondary parts of the sentences.
- •49. The head-first-head last approach to the phrase structure.
- •50. Marked and unmarked forms of English grammar.
- •51. The system of polarity: support the theory with examples.
- •52. Semantic scope of negation.
- •53.The role of preposition in combining words into sentences.
- •54. The types of the predicate and the ways of its realization. Problems
- •55.The types of the predicate and the ways of its realization.
- •56. The types of attribute and the ways of its realization
- •57. The Rank scale.
- •58. The transactional and interactional functions of a language.
- •59) Extended and unextended sentences in modern English
- •60)The schematic of the English sentence.
38.M.Y.Blokh`s theory of English phrases
According to Blokh: Grammatical category is a system expressing a generalized grammatical meaning by means of paradigmatic correlation of grammatical forms. The forms united into Gr Cat possesses a common general meaning that gives a name to the category and each form possesses its own specific meaning that presents a specification of the general meaning & differentiates the form from the other forms within the category. Most of the Gr Cat express diff relations betw phenomena of reality reflected in our minds in the form of concepts & therefore they r conceptual by nature (GC of Tense presents a specific lingual expression of objective (ontological) time) Conceptual GC are universal, they exist in most of the lges though their scope may vary considerably. The meanings of L unites expressed in the [] always present the result of interaction bween several GC as well as bween the gram & lex meanings in the [] and difer types of contexts (linguistic & extra~)- tense & aspect; tense & mood. So-called “pure gram meanings”, free from intercategorial interaction are nonexistent. There exists interaction bw the Cat of difer parts of Sp. As well as bw the morphological & syntactic cat (the use of the Adv Then and P Ind forms are usually correlated with the use of the definite article in the Subj position (then the man decided to go shopping) – HARMONIZATION Another – is observed when a gram form of 1 cat expresses a gram meaning of another cat( [] with Oblique moods – If he were with us -If he had been/// - T Correl) It is a relational unit which specifies the meaningful relations between grammatical forms constituting the peculiar, purely native structure of a language; unity of GM & GF, a system of expressing a generalized GM by means of paradigmatical correlations of GFs (tense, voice, aspect, person, case, number, mood, time correlation).
39.The paradigmatic structure of Simple Santences
Simple Sentence: Paradigmatic Structure. Traditional grammar studied the sentence from the point of view of its syntagmatic structure: the sentence was approached as a string of certain parts fulfilling the corresponding syntactic functions. As for paradigmatic relations, which, as we know, are inseparable from syntagmatic relations, they were explicitly revealed only as part of morphological descriptions, because, up to recent times, the idea of the sentence model with its functional variations was not developed. Thus, the sentence was traditionally taken at its face value as a ready unit of speech, and systemic connections between sentences were formulated in terms of classifications. In contemporary modern linguistics, paradigmatic structuring of lingual connections and dependencies has penetrated into the would-be "purely syntagmatic" sphere of the sentence. The paradigmatic approach to this element of rendering communicative information, marked a new stage in the development of the science of language; indeed, it is nothing else than paradigmatic approach that has provided a comprehensive theoretical ground for treating the sentence not only as a ready unit of speech, but also and above all as a meaningful lingual unit existing in a pattern form. Paradigmatics finds its essential expression in a system of oppositions making the corresponding meaningful (functional) categories. Syntactic oppositions are realized by correlated sentence patterns the observable relations between which can be described as "transformations", i.e. as transitions from one pattern of certain notional parts to another pattern of the same notional parts.