Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Cross_cultural psychology Kazakhstan A.docx
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
501.62 Кб
Скачать

5.5 Universals in language.

There is strong evidence that language as a tool for thinking has many universal and invariant elements. Although culture may determine to some degree our thoughts, languages do not of their own accord yield different thinking processes. The research with deaf children shows that cognitive development is to some degree independent of language (see also Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1979). Deaf children display a language-like structure in their gestures, often using multiple gestures, compared to normal hearing children who will typically only use one gesture (Goldin-Meadow & Mylander, 1998). The structural similarities in gestures for deaf children were demonstrated in both the U.S. and China suggesting an innate basis for language gesture expression. Chomsky (1980) argued that humans possess a hardwired universal grammar to which all languages conform that is independent of cultural influence. When a child is born this innate organization is present in the form of a language organ analogous to other organs present for vision or hearing and is genetically based and common to all members of the species (Chomsky, 2000).

An apparent innate universal organization determines at least some aspects of word order in a language. For example a word order placing the object first followed by the subject and then the verb does not occur in any language (Greenberg, 1978). Intonation also has universal properties (Bolinger, 1978) with emphasis indicated by a high pitch. To support this point try to listen North Korean news casters on YouTube talk about their great or dear leaders and the intonation convey the importance and reverence attributed to these more or less superhuman objects of worship. Evidence for universality in language is also supported by similar semantic meaning in all languages (Osgood, 1980). Factor analyses of adjectives were administered in surveys to respondents in varying language groups and the results showed that in all participant groups the results yielded three factors called evaluative, potency, and activity dimensions. Polarity of the positive and negative is also thought to be a basic universal characteristic of human cognition. In calculating a similarity index for 12 languages the results yielded a correlation of .67 (Osgood, 1979). Although languages are different and dependent on cultural evolution, there are cross-cultural invariant elements that also suggest our common genetic evolutionary history.

5.6 Intercultural communication.

Culture affects the language we use, the choice of words and sentences, and our thoughts, feelings and behavior. As we have seen culture also affects our nonverbal behavior with the same gestures having different meanings in different cultural groups. Culture shapes our nonverbal behavior automatically at a cognitive level not requiring reflection. Intercultural messages are understood subjectively from the perspective of the listener. The interpretation of communication is a perceptual process influenced by ingroup values, by the emotions signaled by the nonverbal context, and by cultural stereotypes. These cultural filters are largely unconscious, but that does not minimize the impact of the cultural canalization on effective communication. Intercultural communication is especially difficult since both the encoding as well as decoding of messages is understood using different cultural filters, and evaluating the intent of the communicator is a judgment process influenced by our attributions rather than the content of the message (Gudykunst & Shapiro, 1996).

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]