
Cosmology. The Origin and Evolution of Cosmic Structure - Coles P., Lucchin F
..pdf5
Thermal History
of the Hot Big
Bang Model
5.1 The Standard Hot Big Bang
The hot Big Bang is the name usually given to the standard cosmological model: a homogeneous, isotropic universe whose evolution is governed by the Friedmann equations obtained from general relativity (with or without a cosmological constant), whose main constituents can be described by matter and radiation fluids, and whose kinematic properties (i.e. the Hubble constant) match those we observe in the real Universe. It is further assumed that the radiation component of the energy density is of cosmological origin: this is why the term ‘hot’ is given to the model. Of course, our real Universe is not exactly homogeneous and isotropic, so this model is to some extent an abstraction. However, as we shall see later, this standard model does provide us with a framework within which we can study the emergence of structures like the observed galaxies and clusters of galaxies from small fluctuations in the density of the early Universe. In this chapter, we give a brief overview of the evolution the basic physical properties of this model; more detailed treatment will be deferred to Chapters 8 and 9.
As we have already seen in Chapter 4, the present-day matter density is
ρ0m = ρ0cΩ0m 1.9 × 10−29Ω0mh2 g cm−3. |
(5.1.1) |
In the following, as in Chapter 4, we shall drop one of the subscripts and use Ω0 to quantify the density of non-relativistic matter. Observations tell us that

110 Thermal History of the Hot Big Bang Model
Ω0 is somewhere in the range 0.01 < Ω0 < 2. The luminous material in galaxies and clusters is primarily hydrogen and a small part of helium. Cosmological nucleosynthesis provides an explanation for the relative abundances of these, and other, light elements: see Chapter 8. As we have seen, however, the Universe is probably dominated by unseen dark matter, whose nature is yet to be clarified.
The energy-density contributed by the radiation background at 2.73 K is
ρ0r = |
σrT0r4 |
|
|
c2 |
4.8 × 10−34 g cm−3, |
(5.1.2) |
where σr is the radiation density constant. We discussed this before, in Chapter 4. The standard model also predicts the existence of a cosmological background of neutrinos, which we discuss more fully in Chapter 8, with an energy density
ρ0ν Nν × 10−34 g cm−3; |
(5.1.3) |
Nν is the number of neutrino species, which is now known from particle physics experiments at LEP/CERN to be very close to Nν = 3. Equation (5.1.3) applies if the neutrinos are massless, which we shall assume to be the case in this chapter; the idea that they might have a mass of order mν 10 eV would have important implications for cosmology, as we shall discuss in Chapters 8 and 13.
If the neutrinos are massless, then their contribution to the density parameter is
Ω0ν Ω0r 10−5h−2.
From the point of view of the Friedmann models, the real Universe is well approximated as a dust or matter-dominated model, with total energy density
ρ0 = ρ0m + ρ0r |
+ ρ0ν ρ0m, |
(5.1.4) |
|
and pressure |
|
|
|
p0 = p0m + p0r + p0ν ρ0m |
kBT0m |
+ 31 ρ0rc2 ρ0rc2 ρ0c2, |
(5.1.5) |
mp |
where T0m is the present temperature of the intergalactic gas (assumed to be hydrogen) and mp is the proton mass. This temperature is di erent from the temperature of the radiative component, T0r, because matter and radiation are completely decoupled from each other at the present epoch. In fact the neutrino component is also decoupled from the other two (matter and photons). Matter and radiation are decoupled because the characteristic timescale for collisions between photons and neutral hydrogen atoms, τ0c = mp/(ρ0mσHc), where σH is the scattering cross-section of a hydrogen atom, is much larger than the characteristic time for the expansion of the Universe: τH ≡ (a/a)˙ 0 = H0−1.
An important quantity is the ratio, η0, between the present mean numberdensity of nucleons (or baryons), n0b, and the corresponding quantity for photons, n0γ. The present density in baryons is
ρ0m |
1.12 × 10−5Ω0bh2 cm−3, |
|
n0b = mp |
(5.1.6) |

Recombination and Decoupling |
111 |
while the corresponding number for the photons is obtained by integrating over a Planck spectrum at a temperature of T0r = 2.73 K:
|
kBT0r |
3 |
∞ 8πx2 dx |
|
ζ(3) |
|
k |
BT0r |
3 |
|
|
|
n0γ = |
|
|
0 |
|
= 2 |
|
|
|
|
420 cm−3; |
(5.1.7) |
|
c |
ex − 1 |
π2 |
|
c |
the quantity ζ(3) 1.202, where ζ is the Riemann zeta function which crops up in the integral over the black-body spectrum. We therefore have
η0−1 |
n0γ |
3.75 × 107(Ω0bh2)−1; |
(5.1.8) |
= n0b |
we prefer to give the value η−0 1 rather than η0 because, as we shall see, η−0 1 practically coincides with the entropy per baryon, σ0r, which will figure prominently later on. The fact that η−0 1 is so large is of particular importance in the analysis of the standard model; we shall return to it later.
5.2 Recombination and Decoupling
During the period in which matter and radiation are decoupled, the matter temperature, Tm, and the radiation temperature, Tr, evolve independently of each other. If the gas component expands adiabatically, and is assumed to consist only of hydrogen, standard thermodynamics gives us
d ρmc2 + |
3 |
ρm |
kBTm |
a3 |
= −ρm |
kBTm |
da3. |
(5.2.1) |
2 |
mp |
mp |
Given that ρma3 is constant, because of mass conservation, Equation (5.2.1) leads to
|
a0 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Tm = T0m |
|
|
|
|
= T0m(1 + z)2, |
|
|
(5.2.2) |
||||
|
a |
|
|
||||||||||
which is nothing other than the usual relation |
TV |
γ−1 |
= |
const |
. |
for a monatomic |
|||||||
gas (γ = |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
3 ). For a gas of photons, we use the relationship between the energy- |
|||||||||||||
density and temperature of a black body, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
ρrc2 = σrTr4, |
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2.3) |
||||||
to find that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Tr = T0r |
a0 |
= T0r(1 |
+ z). |
|
|
|
(5.2.4) |
|||||
|
a |
|
|
|
|
If σc, the collision cross-section between photons and atoms, is constant, then the collision time τc simply scales as the inverse of the number-density of atoms and therefore decreases with redshift much more rapidly than the characteristic timescale for the expansion τH: for example, in a flat universe,
τc ρm−1 |
(1 |
+ z)−3, |
(5.2.5) |
|||
τH = |
a˙ |
−1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
+ z)−3/2, |
(5.2.6) |
|
a |
112 Thermal History of the Hot Big Bang Model
where we have assumed matter domination to calculate τH; if the Universe were radiation dominated, this reasoning would still hold good. In fact, the crosssection for scattering of electrons by atoms does not behave as simply as this with z. The main mechanism by which photons interact with matter is Thomson scattering by electrons, but photons of su cient energy can also be absorbed by the atom, resulting in photo-ionisation. The ions thus produced may then recombine, with the usual cascades producing the Lyman and Balmer series. Photons of exactly the right wavelength can also cause upward transitions, leading to absorption lines. However, in the cosmological situation we are interested in, it su ces to take Thomson scattering by electrons as the dominant mechanism. As we shall see, as the photon energies increase to the energies relevant for the other processes mentioned here, the plasma becomes fully ionised and Thomson scattering is then indeed the dominant interaction between the matter and radiation. In any event, there clearly exists a time, say td, before which scattering occurs on a timescale much less than the expansion timescale, resulting in a tight coupling between matter and radiation. After td, a process of decoupling occurs and, for t td, matter and radiation e ectively evolve separately. As we shall see in Chapter 9, this process is not instantaneous and actually continues over a relatively large range of t (or z). Before decoupling, at t = td, matter and radiation are held in equilibrium with each other at the same temperature, and T varies with z in a manner intermediate between (5.2.2) and (5.2.4), which we can represent by Equation (5.3.3) below. At very high T (high z), the equilibrium state for the matter component has a very high state of ionisation. As T decreases, the fraction of atoms which are ionised (the degree of ionisation) falls. There exists therefore a time, say trec, before which the matter is fully ionised, and after which the ionisation is very small. This transition is usually called recombination, although it would be more accurate to call it simply combination. Recombination is also a relatively gradual process so it does not occur at a single definite t = trec. Notice, however, that in general td trec. We discuss recombination and decoupling in the context of realistic cosmological models in Section 5.4 and in Chapter 9.
5.3 Matter–Radiation Equivalence
Another important timescale in the thermal history of the Universe is that of matter–radiation equivalence, say t = teq, which we take to occur at zeq = z(teq). Remember that the matter density evolves according to
ρm = ρ0m(1 + z)3, |
(5.3.1) |
while the density of radiation follows
ρr = ρ0r(1 + z)4, |
(5.3.2) |
in the period after decoupling, and
ρr T4 (1 + z)4+H(z) |
(5.3.3) |

Thermal History of the Universe |
113 |
before decoupling; in the relation (5.3.3), 0 < H(z) < 4 is a term included to take account of the evolution of T(z) in this regime. It turns out that H(z) is actually very small, for reasons we shall discuss later.
Matter–radiation equivalence occurs when the densities (5.3.1) and (5.3.3) are equal. Of course, if there are other components of the fluid which are relativistic at interesting redshifts, then they should, strictly speaking, be included in the definition of this timescale. In general, if there are several relativistic components, labelled i, each contributing a fraction Ω0r,i of the present critical density, then the total relativistic contribution dominates for
1 + z > 1 + zeq = |
Ω0 |
= |
|
Ω |
, |
(5.3.4) |
i Ω0r,i |
Ω0r,tot |
where Ω0 is the density parameter for the non-relativistic material. We have assumed H = 0 in Equation (5.3.4). If we neglect the contribution to the sum in (5.3.4) due to relativistic particles other than photons, we find zeq 4.3 × 104Ω0h2.
5.4 Thermal History of the Universe
Before decoupling at t = td, matter and radiation are tightly coupled. This is ultimately due to the fact that, before recombination, the matter component is fully ionised and the relevant photon scattering cross-section is therefore the Thomson scattering cross-section σT, which is much larger than that presented by a neutral atom of hydrogen. As we have explained, this guarantees that the radiative component (photons) and the matter component (the electron–proton plasma) have the same temperature T. Let us now investigate the behaviour of this temperature in more detail.
The appropriate expression governing the adiabatic expansion of a gas of matter and radiation is
|
3ρmkBT |
|
|
|
|
mkBT |
|
σrT4 |
|
|
d ρmc2 + |
|
+ σrT4 |
a3 |
|
= − |
ρ |
+ |
|
da3, |
(5.4.1) |
2mp |
mp |
3 |
in which we assume the matter component has the equation of state of a perfect gas:
p = |
ρmkBT |
|
mp . |
(5.4.2) |
Recall that ρma3 = const., and introduce the dimensionless constant
σrad = |
4mpσrT3 |
; |
(5.4.3) |
3kBρm |
the physical significance of σrad have
dT
T
will become apparent shortly. From (5.4.1) we
= − |
1 + σrad |
da |
, |
(5.4.4) |
|
21 + σrad a |
|||||
|

114 Thermal History of the Hot Big Bang Model
which, unfortunately, cannot be integrated analytically, because σrad(T) depends on the unknown function T(a). It is easy to see that σrad(T) does not depend on a after decoupling if we interpret T as the temperature of the radiation. The value of σrad must therefore coincide with its present value σrad(t = t0), which can be calculated in terms of the present density of the Universe, ρ0m, and the present radiation temperature, T0r:
σrad(t = t0) = |
4mpσrT0r3 |
3.6η0−1 1.35 × 108(Ω0bh2)−1, |
(5.4.5) |
3kBρ0m |
which is a very large number given the known bounds on the parameters Ω0b and h.
The Equation (5.4.4) is valid also at t = td. In a short interval of time at td, we can make use of the fact that σrad(t) σrad(td) = σrad(t0) 1, thus obtaining
dT |
da |
, |
(5.4.6) |
|
|
− |
|
||
T |
a |
which, upon integration, leads to Equation (5.2.4). This shows that we indeed expect H 0; it is virtually guaranteed by the very high actual value of σ0r.
At higher temperatures, the matter component also becomes relativistic and therefore assumes the equation of state p = 13 ρc2. In this regime the behaviour of T is very closely represented by Equation (5.2.4). The reason for this is as follows.
Suppose the temperature of the Universe exceeds a value Tp, such that |
|
kBTp 2mc2, |
(5.4.7) |
where p is a particle with mass m (for example an electron). In this situation the creation–annihilation reaction
γ + γ e+ + e− |
(5.4.8) |
has an equilibrium which lies to the right. A significant number of electron– positron (e+–e−) pairs are therefore created. At higher temperatures still, even more particle species might be created, of higher and higher masses.
The era contained between the two temperatures Te ( 5×109 K) and Tπ , where e and π are the electron and pion, respectively, is called the lepton era because, as besides the radiative fluid of photons and neutrinos, the background of leptons e+, e−, µ+, µ− and τ+ and τ− dominates the energy density. The brief interval with 200–300 MeV > kBT > Tπ 130 MeV is called the hadron era, because as well as photons, neutrinos and leptons, we now also have hadrons (π0, π+, π−, p, p,¯ n, n,¯ etc.); they do not, however, dominate the energy density. For kBT > 200– 300 MeV, the hadrons are separated into their component quarks. We shall discuss these phases in some detail in Chapter 8. There are so many relativistic particle species at such high energies, however, that for the moment it su ces to say that it is a good approximation to take the relativistic equation of state p = 13 ρc2 and ρc2 = AσT4 appropriate for pure radiation, which gives the Equation (5.2.4) exactly, but in which the constant A describes the fact that there are many di erent relativistic particles in addition to the photons.

Radiation Entropy per Baryon |
115 |
5.5 Radiation Entropy per Baryon
As we have seen in Section 5.4, the high value of σrad guarantees that the temperature and density of the radiation, to a very good approximation, evolve as in a pure radiation universe. The quantity σrad is actually related to the ratio between the entropy of the radiation per unit volume,
sr = |
ρrc2 + pr |
4 |
ρrc2 |
4 |
σrT |
3 |
, |
(5.5.1) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
T |
= 3 |
|
T |
= |
3 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
and the number-density of baryons, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nb = |
ρm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5.2) |
|||||
|
mp |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
written in dimensionless form by dividing by Boltzmann’s constant: |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
sr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
σrad = |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
(5.5.3) |
||||||
|
kBnb |
|
|
|
|
The quantity σrad−1 is proportional to the ratio η between the number-density of baryons and that of photons. From Equations (5.1.8) and (5.2.3) we get
σrad = 3.6η−1. |
(5.5.4) |
The quantity σrad is also proportional to the ratio of the heat capacity per unit volume of the radiation, ρrcr, and that of the matter, ρmcm. In fact, for the radiation,
ρrcr = |
∂(ρrc2) |
= |
∂(σrT4) |
= 4σrT3, |
|||||||||||
|
∂T |
|
|
∂T |
|
||||||||||
and for the matter, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∂(3ρmkBT/2mp) |
|
|
3 ρm |
||||||||||
ρmcm = |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
kB, |
|||
|
|
|
|
∂T |
2 |
mp |
|||||||||
from which |
|
|
ρrcr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
= 2σrad; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
ρmcm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5.5)
(5.5.6)
(5.5.7)
the high value of this ratio makes sure that the coupled matter–radiation fluid follows the cooling law for pure radiation to a very good approximation.
The quantity σrad is also (and finally) related to the scale of primordial baryon–
antibaryon asymmetry present in the early Universe. Let us indicate by nb and nb¯
the baryon and antibaryon number density, respectively. The quantity (nb −nb¯)a3 remains constant during the expansion of the Universe because baryon number is a conserved quantity. In fact, one does not observe a significant presence of antibaryons, so the relevant quantity is just n0ba30. (If there were significant quantities of antibaryons, annihilation events would lead to a much greater background
116 Thermal History of the Hot Big Bang Model
of gamma rays than is observed.) In the epoch following TGUT 1015 GeV, which we will discuss in Chapter 7, we have
nb n¯ nγ T3, (5.5.8)
b
from which the baryon–antibaryon asymmetry is expected to be
nb − nb¯ |
|
|
nb − nb¯ |
|
n0b |
|
(5.5.9) |
|
nb + nb¯ |
|
2nγ |
|
2n0γ . |
||||
|
|
The baryon–antibaryon asymmetry is very small, of the order of σrad−1, so that for every, say, 109 antibaryons there will be 109 + 1 baryons. The reason for this asymmetry, and why it is so small, is therefore the same as the reason why the value of σrad is large. Developments in the theory of elementary particles have led to some suggestions as to how cosmological baryosynthesis might occur; we shall discuss them in some detail in Chapter 7.
5.6 Timescales in the Standard Model
In the standard model, after the lepton era, the Friedmann Equation (1.12.6) becomes
|
a˙ |
2 |
|
|
a0 |
|
|
a0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
= H02 |
Ω0 |
|
+ Ω0rK0 |
|
|
+ (1 − Ω0 − Ω0r) , |
(5.6.1) |
a0 |
a |
a |
where, as usual, the su x ‘0’ refers to the present epoch. The last bracket neglects contributions from relativistic particles which are small at the present time. Jumping the gun slightly (see Chapter 8 for details), we have replaced the purely radiation contribution Ωr by K0Ωr to take account of the contribution of light neutrinos to the relativistic part of the fluid; that is to say, the sum over i in Equation (5.3.4) now includes both photons and neutrinos. We shall see later, in Chapter 8, that
K0 = 1 + 87 ( |
4 |
)4/3Nν 1 + 0.227Nν , |
(5.6.2) |
11 |
with Nν the number of types of light neutrino; K0 1.68 if Nν = 3. The second part of K0 derives from the neutrinos, and di ers from the photon contribution because they are fermions. The matter component is simply written Ω0 in Equation (5.6.1).
In light of Section 5.3, we can now calculate the equivalence redshift, zeq, at which ρm = K0ρr = ρeq. The result is
ρeq = ρm(zeq) = ρ0cΩ0(1 + zeq)3 = K0ρr(zeq) = K0ρ0r(1 + zeq)4, |
(5.6.3) |
||
from which we obtain |
|
|
|
1 + zeq = |
ρ0cΩ0 |
= Ω0r−1K0−1Ω0 2.6 × 104Ω0h2 |
(5.6.4) |
K0ρ0r |
Timescales in the Standard Model |
117 |
if Nν = 3. In and before the lepton era, Equation (5.6.1) is replaced by
|
a˙ |
2 |
|
|
a0 |
|
a0 |
2 |
+ (1 − Ω0) |
|
|
a0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
= H02 |
Ω0 |
|
+ Ω0rKc |
|
|
H02 |
ΩrKc |
|
; |
(5.6.5) |
|
a0 |
a |
a |
a |
the approximation on the right-hand side holds for z = a0/a zeq 1. The factor Kc(z) takes account of the creation of pairs of higher and higher mass, as we discussed in Section 5.4. As we shall see in Chapter 8, Kc is not expected to be much bigger than K0. A good approximation for the period following the lepton era and before decoupling is therefore obtained by using Equation (5.6.5) with
Kc(z) K0:
|
|
|
|
a˙ |
2 |
|
a0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H02Ω0rK0 |
|
|
. |
(5.6.6) |
|
|
|
a0 |
a |
|||||||
For redshifts z (Ω0rK0)−1 zeq this equation gives |
|
|||||||||
t(z) |
1 |
|
(1 + z)−2 3.2 × 1019K0−1/2(1 + z)−2 s. |
(5.6.7) |
||||||
|
|
|||||||||
1/2 |
1/2 |
|||||||||
|
2H0Ω0r |
K0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extrapolating Equation (5.6.7) to zeq (where in fact it is only marginally valid), one obtains
teq = t(zeq) 104(Ω0h2)−2 years.
At much later times, in the interval between z zeq and 1 + z tion (5.6.1) is well approximated by
|
a˙ |
2 |
|
a0 |
||
|
|
|
H02 |
Ω0 |
|
. |
a0 |
a |
(5.6.8)
Ω0−1, Equa-
(5.6.9)
In this period it is a good approximation to use Equation (2.4.8), from which we get
|
t(z) − teq |
2 |
[(1 + z)−3/2 − (1 + zeq)−3/2]. |
(5.6.10) |
|
|
1/2 |
||||
|
|
|
3H0Ω0 |
|
|
For t teq, and therefore for z zeq, Equation (5.6.10) can be written |
|
||||
t(z) |
2 |
(1 + z)−3/2 2.1 × 1017Ω0−1/2h−1(1 + z)−3/2 s. |
(5.6.11) |
||
|
|||||
1/2 |
|||||
|
3H0Ω0 |
|
|
|
If the recombination redshift, zrec, is of order 103, which we shall argue is indeed the case in Chapter 10, it will be lower than that of matter–radiation equivalence as long as Ω0h2 > 0.04. The previous expression gives the recombination time as
trec = t(zrec) 3 × 105 years. |
(5.6.12) |
The age of the Universe, t0, can be obtained by integrating Equation (5.6.1) from the Big Bang (t = 0) to the present epoch. This integral can be divided into two