
- •Introduction
- •Implications for Business
- •The Tragedy of the Congo (Zaire)
- •Introduction
- •The Gold Standard
- •Nature of the Gold Standard
- •The Strength of the Gold Standard
- •The Period between the Wars, 1918-1939
- •The Bretton Woods System
- •Flexibility
- •The Role of the World Bank
- •The Collapse of the Fixed Exchange Rate System
- •Exchange Rates since 1973
- •Figure 10.1
- •Speculation
- •Uncertainty
- •Who Is Right?
- •Exchange Rate Regimes in Practice
- •Pegged Exchange Rates and Currency Boards
- •Figure 10.2
- •Target Zones: The European Monetary System
- •Performance of the System
- •Recent Activities and the Future of the imf
- •Financial Crises in the Post-Bretton Woods Era
- •Third World Debt Crisis
- •Figure 10.3
- •Mexican Currency Crisis of 1995
- •The Asian Crisis
- •The Investment Boom
- •Excess Capacity
- •The Debt Bomb
- •Expanding Imports
- •The Crisis
- •Evaluating the imf's Policy Prescriptions
- •Implications for Business
- •Currency Management
- •Business Strategy
- •Corporate - Government Relations
- •Chapter Summary
- •Critical Discussion Questions
- •Case Discussion Questions
Corporate - Government Relations
As major players in the international trade and investment environment, businesses can influence government policy toward the international monetary system. For example, intense government lobbying by US exporters helped convince the US government that intervention in the foreign exchange market was necessary. Similarly, much of the impetus behind establishment of the exchange rate mechanism of the European monetary system came from European businesspeople, who understood the costs of volatile exchange rates.
With this in mind, business can and should use its influence to promote an international monetary system that facilitates the growth of international trade and investment. Whether a fixed or floating regime is optimal is a subject for debate. However, exchange rate volatility such as the world experienced during the 1980s and 1990s creates an environment less conducive to international trade and investment than one with more stable exchange rates. Therefore, it would seem to be in the interests of international business to promote an international monetary system that minimizes volatile exchange rate movements, particularly when those movements are unrelated to long-run economic fundamentals.
Chapter Summary
This chapter explained the workings of the international monetary system and pointed out its implications for international business. This chapter made the following points:
The gold standard is a monetary standard that pegs currencies to gold and guarantees convertibility to gold.
It was thought that the gold standard contained an automatic mechanism that contributed to the simultaneous achievement of a balance-of-payments equilibrium by all countries.
The gold standard broke down during the 1930s as countries engaged in competitive devaluations.
The Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates was established in 1944. The US dollar was the central currency of this system; the value of every other currency was pegged to its value. Significant exchange rate devaluations were allowed only with the permission of the IMF.
The role of the IMF was to maintain order in the international monetary system (i) to avoid a repetition of the competitive devaluations of the 1930s and (ii) to control price inflation by imposing monetary discipline on countries.
To build flexibility into the system, the IMF stood ready to lend countries funds to help protect their currency on the foreign exchange market in the face of speculative pressure, and to assist countries in correcting a fundamental disequilibrium in their balance-of-payments position.
The fixed exchange rate system collapsed in 1973, primarily due to speculative pressure on the dollar following a rise in US inflation and a growing US balance-of-trade deficit.
Since 1973 the world has operated with a floating exchange rate regime, and exchange rates have become more volatile and far less predictable. Volatile exchange rate movements have helped reopen the debate over the merits of fixed and floating systems.
The case for a floating exchange rate regime claims: (i) that such a system gives countries autonomy regarding their monetary policy and (ii) that floating exchange rates facilitate smooth adjustment of trade imbalances.
The case for a fixed exchange rate regime claims: (i) that the need to maintain a fixed exchange rate imposes monetary discipline on a country, (ii) that floating exchange rate regimes are vulnerable to speculative pressure, (iii) that the uncertainty that accompanies floating exchange rates dampens the growth of international trade and investment, and (iv) that far from correcting trade imbalances, depreciating a currency on the foreign exchange market tends to cause price inflation.
In today's international monetary system, some countries have adopted floating exchange rates, some have pegged their currency to another currency, such as the US dollar, and some have pegged their currency to a basket of other currencies, allowing their currency to fluctuate within a zone around the basket.
In the post-Bretton Woods era, the IMF has continued to play an important role in helping countries navigate their way through financial crises by lending significant capital to embattled governments and by requiring them to adopt certain macroeconomic policies.
There is an important debate taking place over the appropriateness of IMF-mandated macroeconomic policies. Critics charge that the IMF often imposes inappropriate conditions on developing nations that are the recipients of its loans.
The present managed-float system of exchange rate determination has increased the importance of currency management in international businesses.
The volatility of exchange rates under the present managed-float system creates both opportunities and threats. One way of responding to this volatility is for companies to build strategic flexibility by dispersing production to different locations around the globe by contracting out manufacturing (in the case of low-value-added manufacturing) and other means.