- •Theoretical grammar
- •The Subject of Theoretical Grammar
- •Kinds of Theoretical Grammar
- •Theoretical approaches to language data interpretation
- •Main grammatical notions
- •1.3.1. Syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations.
- •1.3.2. Grammatical categories.
- •Subdivision of Language Levels’
- •General characteristics of the contemporary English language system
- •Characteristics of English:
- •Kinds of Morphemes
- •2.2. Principles of subdivision of parts of speech
- •1.Henry Sweet (19th century), an English linguist
- •2. Jence Otto Harry Jespersen (1860-1943), a Danish linguist
- •3. Charls Freez (19th-20th century), an American linguist
- •4. Lev Scherba (1880-1944), a Russian (Soviet) linguist,
- •2.3. Classification of parts of speech
- •2.4. Theory of the field structure of the word.
- •3.2. Subcategorization of the Noun.
- •The first classification of nouns
- •The second classification of nouns
- •3.3. Grammatical categories of the Noun.
- •The problem of the Gender of the English Noun.
- •The category of the Number.
- •The category of Case.
- •Comparing Grammatical Forms of the cases of the Latin and English Noun
- •4.1. Interpretation of the status of the English Article
- •4.2. The problem of the number of articles (how many morphological forms the Article can be presented in)
- •4.3. Functions and significance of the Article
- •5.2. Word-formative and word-changing systems of the Verb
- •5.3. Classification of verbs
- •5.3.1. Morphological Classification
- •Scheme of Morphological Classification of Verbs
- •5.3.2. Semantic Classification
- •Scheme of the 1st Semantic Classification of Verbs
- •Scheme of the 2nd Semantic Classification of Verbs
- •5.3.3. Syntactic Classification
- •Scheme of Syntactic Classification of Verbs
- •5.4. Grammatical Categories of the English Verb General Characteristics of the Categories of the English Verb
- •I Categories of the Finite Verbs
- •Terms that are used to name Forms of the Verb that do not make agree with Persons
- •6.2. The Paradigm of the Non-Finite Forms
- •6.3. Functions and Significance of the Non-Finite Forms
- •7.2. Classification of Word-combinations
- •Examples of types of word-combinations
- •Syntactic Location;
- •Morphological Form
- •Presence or absence of Syntacategorematic words
- •7.2. Classification of sentences. Structural Approach.
- •General Structure of the Simple Sentence
- •7.3. Semantics of the Sentence. Relevant Model.
- •Correspondence of Semantic Roles and their syntactic realisation
- •Practice I
- •Test I (teacher’s copy)
- •Test I (s)
- •Practice I Main grammar notions Syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations. Grammar categories
Characteristics of English:
Auxiliaries. Auxiliary verb does not have a lexical meaning; notional verb has that.
For instance:
She has already been preparing for three hours (both auxiliaries – has been – do not have lexical meanings) = Она готовится уже три часа.
She has a nice kid (has is not an auxiliary but a notional verb here, so it has a lexical meaning to obtain, to posses sth) = Она имеет милого ребенка = У нее есть милый ребенок.
Scarcity of flexible forms.
For instance alterations:
a) of the Noun (Singular and Plural forms): a chair (Sng) – chairs (Pl);
b) of the Verb (in accordance with Tense, Person, Number): we approach (Present Simple, Plural), he approaches (Present Simple, Third Person Singular), we, he, etc. approached (Past Simple);
c) of the Adjective (Degrees of Comparison): pretty (Neutral) – prettier (Comparative) – the prettiest (Superlative).
Homonymy (which refers to the phenomenon of similar spelling or pronunciation of words that have different lexical meanings).
For instance, homonymy of Grammar affixes:
Boys study (Plural, Nominative Case) – boy’s book (Singular, Possessive Case) – boys’ book (Plural, Possessive Case).
Absence of Grammatical Agreement of a noun and an adjective that attributes the noun.
For instance:
A big boy (he) \ girl (she) \ apple (it). Compare with Russian большой мальчик, большая девочка, большое яблоко.
Use of the Noun in the Common Case as a prepositional attribute.
For instance:
Table (noun) + lamp (noun) = table lamp (table is a prepositional attribute).
Formal double complete predicative center (when a verb obviously has a personal form).
For instance:
Compare: It is dark. and Темно.
Wide use of the assistant words.
For instance:
The Noun: one, they, that, this, those, etc.
The Verb: do, get, etc.
Wide development of secondary predicative combinations.
For instance:
Complex Object: They expected me to behave as they wanted but I was not going to allow them to manipulate me.
Direct word order.
For instance:
I have already been there.
Yesterday we gave him a book.
II Structure of the Word. Problem of Parts of Speech
The notions of the Word and the Morpheme.
Principles of subdivision of parts of speech.
Classification of parts of speech.
Theory of the field structure of the word.
2.1. The notions of the Word and the Morpheme
The word morphology is based on the two Greek words morpheme and logos.
Morpheme means form.
Logos was regarded as one of the main notions of the Old Greek philosophy. It meant both: 1) word (expression, sentence or speech) and 2) sense/meaning (notion, judgment or base). To the Old Greek philosophy it was introduced by Heraclites in the 6th – 5th centuries B.C. Logos (Mind) and Spirit (Soul) were considered as the base of the World’s Fire or the initiation of Existence (Life).
Thus, it is seen that morphology in Linguistics does not only refer to the Form but also takes into consideration the Content.
To simplify, Morphology studies morpheme and word which is built with morphemes and can change due to them.
Morphology refers to:
A part of the system of language, the system of parts of speech, their grammar meanings, categories and forms of the Word.
A section of Grammar that studies such part of the language system; a science about parts of speech, their grammar meanings, categories and forms of word.
Word (general definition) is the main unity of morphology; a unity of language that denotes/names a definite object, thing, phenomenon or notion.
The definition of the Word, which is characteristic for flexible languages (given by Maslow, a professor, Leningrad school):
Word is a minimum unity of a language whose property is a positional independence (the examples are given under). It has characteristics of mobility (different words-parts of speech take different positions in a sentence) and discrete (can exist separately unlike/in the contrast to the Morpheme that has a meaning but cannot exist separately).
For example:
R
espect
is a desirable attitude (subject).
He has been paid a lot of respect (object). positional independence and mobility
We respect him (predicate).
When the word respect is said or written or heard it can exist separately and be perceived and understood (discrete).
Morpheme is a minimum meaningful unity of word that does not have a positional independency (prefix takes the position in the beginning of the Word, root takes main central position in the midst and suffix – at the end). Thus, all the morphemes can be divided into two big groups, root morphemes and affixes (table 2.1).
Table 2.1
