- •Theoretical grammar
- •The Subject of Theoretical Grammar
- •Kinds of Theoretical Grammar
- •Theoretical approaches to language data interpretation
- •Main grammatical notions
- •1.3.1. Syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations.
- •1.3.2. Grammatical categories.
- •Subdivision of Language Levels’
- •General characteristics of the contemporary English language system
- •Characteristics of English:
- •Kinds of Morphemes
- •2.2. Principles of subdivision of parts of speech
- •1.Henry Sweet (19th century), an English linguist
- •2. Jence Otto Harry Jespersen (1860-1943), a Danish linguist
- •3. Charls Freez (19th-20th century), an American linguist
- •4. Lev Scherba (1880-1944), a Russian (Soviet) linguist,
- •2.3. Classification of parts of speech
- •2.4. Theory of the field structure of the word.
- •3.2. Subcategorization of the Noun.
- •The first classification of nouns
- •The second classification of nouns
- •3.3. Grammatical categories of the Noun.
- •The problem of the Gender of the English Noun.
- •The category of the Number.
- •The category of Case.
- •Comparing Grammatical Forms of the cases of the Latin and English Noun
- •4.1. Interpretation of the status of the English Article
- •4.2. The problem of the number of articles (how many morphological forms the Article can be presented in)
- •4.3. Functions and significance of the Article
- •5.2. Word-formative and word-changing systems of the Verb
- •5.3. Classification of verbs
- •5.3.1. Morphological Classification
- •Scheme of Morphological Classification of Verbs
- •5.3.2. Semantic Classification
- •Scheme of the 1st Semantic Classification of Verbs
- •Scheme of the 2nd Semantic Classification of Verbs
- •5.3.3. Syntactic Classification
- •Scheme of Syntactic Classification of Verbs
- •5.4. Grammatical Categories of the English Verb General Characteristics of the Categories of the English Verb
- •I Categories of the Finite Verbs
- •Terms that are used to name Forms of the Verb that do not make agree with Persons
- •6.2. The Paradigm of the Non-Finite Forms
- •6.3. Functions and Significance of the Non-Finite Forms
- •7.2. Classification of Word-combinations
- •Examples of types of word-combinations
- •Syntactic Location;
- •Morphological Form
- •Presence or absence of Syntacategorematic words
- •7.2. Classification of sentences. Structural Approach.
- •General Structure of the Simple Sentence
- •7.3. Semantics of the Sentence. Relevant Model.
- •Correspondence of Semantic Roles and their syntactic realisation
- •Practice I
- •Test I (teacher’s copy)
- •Test I (s)
- •Practice I Main grammar notions Syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations. Grammar categories
Subdivision of Language Levels’
Language Levels |
Unites |
Essence |
1. Primary |
Basis of elements (conditional statics): |
|
Phonemic |
Phoneme (sound)
|
Phonemes build material form for language signs but are not material signs by themselves. They form morphemes. |
Lexical |
Lexeme (word) |
Words and steady expressions |
Proposemic (пропозематический) |
Phraseme (phrase) |
Sentences |
2. Transitive |
Transition of elements (conditional dynamics): |
|
Morphemic (морфематичный) |
Morpheme (building element of Word) |
from a morpheme to a word |
Denotative (денотативный) |
Denoteme (Categorematic Word or Phrase) |
from a word to a sentence |
Dictumic – from dictum[‘diktem]: a statement that expresses sth that people believe is always true or should be followed – (диктематический) |
Dicteme (sentence or contextual thematic unite of sentences) |
from a sentence to a text |
Certain units are defined by inner, relatively reserved in a corresponded level features. To such unites the following are referred:
Phoneme which is defined with a set of phonologic distinctive signs and which is not marked with the function of a sign;
Word which is defined with the signs of nominative function;
Sentence which is defined with the signs of predicative function (table 1.2).
The quality of other units is distinguished in a necessary and ingenious correlation with the units of adjacent levels. They are
Morpheme which is defined as a component of a word (with its nominative function of a sign);
Denoteme which is defined as a component of a sentence (with its situation-predicative or propositive function);
Dicteme which is a component of a text (with its communicative funtcion) (table 1.2).
General characteristics of the contemporary English language system
All languages are classified on the ground of two basic principles – of their genealogy (origin and relations) and of their typology (structure).
Typological classification is one which is based on the distinguishing similarities and differences of the structures of languages independently on their affinity. It is also called Morphological classification as it studies forms, structures and ‘building’ components of languages.
Typological classification was firstly worked out, grounded and proposed by the brothers August and Fririch Sleggel (XVII/XIX). They distinguished inflectional (флективные), which have inflections, and non-inflectional (нефлективные), which do not have inflections, languages. Besides, they distinguished synthetic (earlier) and analytical (later) languages (Drawing 1.4).
V.Gumboldt (XVII/XIX) reworked the Sleggels’ classification and distinguished four types of languages: insulating (изолирующие или корневые), agglutinative (агглюнативные), incorporated (инкорпорирующие) and inflectional (флективные).
Insulating languages do not have affixes and express grammatical meanings with adjoining of certain words to others with the help of Syntacategorematic (auxiliary) words. There is no difference between root and stem in such languages. Words do not change and consequently do not have any indices of their syntactic correspondence with other words. The main means of syntactic combination is adjoining. Sentence, thus, is a definite sequence of unchangeable and indivisible words-roots.
For instance:
Chinese, Vietnam, Tibetan, etc.
Chinese:
Ma – mother
Ma – hemp
Ma – horse
Ma – to scold at
Ma ma ma. Мама ругает коня.
Ma чи ма. Мама едет на коне.
Agglutinative (glutten (Latin) – glue, agglutino – to glue) languages are the ones in which grammatical meanings are expressed with special affixes – ‘stickers’.
For instance:
Turkish, Georgian, Japanese, etc.
Turkish:
Lar – Plural form
Da – Prepositional (предложный) case
Masa – a table
Baba – a father
Masada – on the table
Masalar – tables
Masalarda – on the tables
Babada – on the father
Babalar – fathers
Babalarda – on the fathers
Incorporated (incorporatio (Latin) – including, joining to a set) or polysynthetic (polys (Greek) – a lot of, synthesis – joining up, association, formation) languages are those in which different parts of an utterance present amorphous words-stems (words-roots) which are incorporated into united complexes number of which, in their turn, are formed with auxiliary elements.
For instance:
Majority of the languages of South America, чукотский
Чукотский:
га – ма – a kind of the case which shows a sign with whom or with what
гапojгeма – with a spear
гаторпojгeма – with a new spear
гатанпojгeма – with a good spear
гатанпелwентепоjгeма – with a good metal spear
Inflectional languages express their grammatical meanings mainly with inflexions.
They are divided into synthetic and analytical.
Grammatical relations of words are expressed by the forms of these very words. A meaningful word alters and presents its new forms to express grammar relations For example: Russian, Ukrainian
|
|
A meaningful word is not able to alter. For that other words are used – auxiliaries. They help to express grammar relations or combine words in phrases or sentences. Peculiarity: auxiliary element (auxiliary verb) does not have a lexical meaning; notional verb does have that. For example: English, French
|
Drawing 1.4. Division of languages as for the systems of changes of their grammar forms
(synthetic languages and analytical)
Old English used to be a synthetic language and used to have its own system of inflections. Though with the time (foreign intrusions, wars, cultural ties) it altered and transformed into an analytical one. Nevertheless in English some synthetic forms are still used (look for example of the 2nd characteristic of English brought under).
