Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
0716859_7027A_lekcii_theoretical_grammar.doc
Скачиваний:
11
Добавлен:
01.03.2025
Размер:
640.51 Кб
Скачать

Subdivision of Language Levels’

Language Levels

Unites

Essence

1. Primary

Basis of elements

(conditional statics):

Phonemic

Phoneme (sound)

Phonemes build material form for language signs but are not material signs by themselves. They form morphemes.

Lexical

Lexeme (word)

Words and steady expressions

Proposemic (пропозематический)

Phraseme (phrase)

Sentences

2. Transitive

Transition of elements

(conditional dynamics):

Morphemic (морфематичный)

Morpheme (building element of Word)

from a morpheme to a word

Denotative (денотативный)

Denoteme (Categorematic Word or Phrase)

from a word to a sentence

Dictumic – from dictum[‘diktem]: a statement that expresses sth that people believe is always true or should be followed – (диктематический)

Dicteme (sentence or contextual thematic unite of sentences)

from a sentence to a text

Certain units are defined by inner, relatively reserved in a corresponded level features. To such unites the following are referred:

  1. Phoneme which is defined with a set of phonologic distinctive signs and which is not marked with the function of a sign;

  2. Word which is defined with the signs of nominative function;

  3. Sentence which is defined with the signs of predicative function (table 1.2).

The quality of other units is distinguished in a necessary and ingenious correlation with the units of adjacent levels. They are

  1. Morpheme which is defined as a component of a word (with its nominative function of a sign);

  2. Denoteme which is defined as a component of a sentence (with its situation-predicative or propositive function);

  3. Dicteme which is a component of a text (with its communicative funtcion) (table 1.2).

    1. General characteristics of the contemporary English language system

All languages are classified on the ground of two basic principles – of their genealogy (origin and relations) and of their typology (structure).

Typological classification is one which is based on the distinguishing similarities and differences of the structures of languages independently on their affinity. It is also called Morphological classification as it studies forms, structures and ‘building’ components of languages.

Typological classification was firstly worked out, grounded and proposed by the brothers August and Fririch Sleggel (XVII/XIX). They distinguished inflectional (флективные), which have inflections, and non-inflectional (нефлективные), which do not have inflections, languages. Besides, they distinguished synthetic (earlier) and analytical (later) languages (Drawing 1.4).

V.Gumboldt (XVII/XIX) reworked the Sleggels’ classification and distinguished four types of languages: insulating (изолирующие или корневые), agglutinative (агглюнативные), incorporated (инкорпорирующие) and inflectional (флективные).

Insulating languages do not have affixes and express grammatical meanings with adjoining of certain words to others with the help of Syntacategorematic (auxiliary) words. There is no difference between root and stem in such languages. Words do not change and consequently do not have any indices of their syntactic correspondence with other words. The main means of syntactic combination is adjoining. Sentence, thus, is a definite sequence of unchangeable and indivisible words-roots.

For instance:

Chinese, Vietnam, Tibetan, etc.

Chinese:

Ma – mother

Ma – hemp

Ma – horse

Ma – to scold at

Ma ma ma. Мама ругает коня.

Ma чи ма. Мама едет на коне.

Agglutinative (glutten (Latin) – glue, agglutino – to glue) languages are the ones in which grammatical meanings are expressed with special affixes – ‘stickers’.

For instance:

Turkish, Georgian, Japanese, etc.

Turkish:

Lar – Plural form

Da – Prepositional (предложный) case

Masa – a table

Baba – a father

Masada – on the table

Masalar – tables

Masalarda – on the tables

Babada – on the father

Babalar – fathers

Babalarda – on the fathers

Incorporated (incorporatio (Latin) – including, joining to a set) or polysynthetic (polys (Greek) – a lot of, synthesis – joining up, association, formation) languages are those in which different parts of an utterance present amorphous words-stems (words-roots) which are incorporated into united complexes number of which, in their turn, are formed with auxiliary elements.

For instance:

Majority of the languages of South America, чукотский

Чукотский:

га – ма – a kind of the case which shows a sign with whom or with what

гапojгeма – with a spear

гаторпojгeма – with a new spear

гатанпojгeма – with a good spear

гатанпелwентепоjгeма – with a good metal spear

Inflectional languages express their grammatical meanings mainly with inflexions.

They are divided into synthetic and analytical.

Grammatical relations of words are expressed by the forms of these very words. A meaningful word alters and presents its new forms to express grammar relations

For example: Russian, Ukrainian

A meaningful word is not able to alter. For that other words are used – auxiliaries. They help to express grammar relations or combine words in phrases or sentences.

Peculiarity: auxiliary element (auxiliary verb) does not have a lexical meaning; notional verb does have that.

For example: English, French

Drawing 1.4. Division of languages as for the systems of changes of their grammar forms

(synthetic languages and analytical)

Old English used to be a synthetic language and used to have its own system of inflections. Though with the time (foreign intrusions, wars, cultural ties) it altered and transformed into an analytical one. Nevertheless in English some synthetic forms are still used (look for example of the 2nd characteristic of English brought under).