- •Theoretical grammar
- •The Subject of Theoretical Grammar
- •Kinds of Theoretical Grammar
- •Theoretical approaches to language data interpretation
- •Main grammatical notions
- •1.3.1. Syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations.
- •1.3.2. Grammatical categories.
- •Subdivision of Language Levels’
- •General characteristics of the contemporary English language system
- •Characteristics of English:
- •Kinds of Morphemes
- •2.2. Principles of subdivision of parts of speech
- •1.Henry Sweet (19th century), an English linguist
- •2. Jence Otto Harry Jespersen (1860-1943), a Danish linguist
- •3. Charls Freez (19th-20th century), an American linguist
- •4. Lev Scherba (1880-1944), a Russian (Soviet) linguist,
- •2.3. Classification of parts of speech
- •2.4. Theory of the field structure of the word.
- •3.2. Subcategorization of the Noun.
- •The first classification of nouns
- •The second classification of nouns
- •3.3. Grammatical categories of the Noun.
- •The problem of the Gender of the English Noun.
- •The category of the Number.
- •The category of Case.
- •Comparing Grammatical Forms of the cases of the Latin and English Noun
- •4.1. Interpretation of the status of the English Article
- •4.2. The problem of the number of articles (how many morphological forms the Article can be presented in)
- •4.3. Functions and significance of the Article
- •5.2. Word-formative and word-changing systems of the Verb
- •5.3. Classification of verbs
- •5.3.1. Morphological Classification
- •Scheme of Morphological Classification of Verbs
- •5.3.2. Semantic Classification
- •Scheme of the 1st Semantic Classification of Verbs
- •Scheme of the 2nd Semantic Classification of Verbs
- •5.3.3. Syntactic Classification
- •Scheme of Syntactic Classification of Verbs
- •5.4. Grammatical Categories of the English Verb General Characteristics of the Categories of the English Verb
- •I Categories of the Finite Verbs
- •Terms that are used to name Forms of the Verb that do not make agree with Persons
- •6.2. The Paradigm of the Non-Finite Forms
- •6.3. Functions and Significance of the Non-Finite Forms
- •7.2. Classification of Word-combinations
- •Examples of types of word-combinations
- •Syntactic Location;
- •Morphological Form
- •Presence or absence of Syntacategorematic words
- •7.2. Classification of sentences. Structural Approach.
- •General Structure of the Simple Sentence
- •7.3. Semantics of the Sentence. Relevant Model.
- •Correspondence of Semantic Roles and their syntactic realisation
- •Practice I
- •Test I (teacher’s copy)
- •Test I (s)
- •Practice I Main grammar notions Syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations. Grammar categories
Examples of types of word-combinations
№ |
Types of Word-combination (WC) |
Examples |
Nuclear regressive |
||
1 |
Adverbial WC |
very quickly |
2 |
Adjectival WC |
very old |
3 |
Substantive WC
|
new book |
Nuclear progressive |
||
4 |
Substantive WC |
a book of poems |
5 |
Adjectival WC |
rich in minerals |
6 |
Verbal WC |
to see a man |
7 |
Prepositional WC
|
under the net |
Nuclear-free independent |
||
8 |
Conjunctive WD of one class |
red and green |
9 |
Non-conjunctive WD of one class |
men, women, children |
10 |
Mutually dependent WC with Primary Predicativity of different classes
|
he laughed |
Nuclear-free dependent |
||
11 |
Accumulative WC of one-class |
wise old (man) |
12 |
Accumulative WC of different-classes |
his old (friend) |
13 |
Mutually dependent WC with Secondary Predicativity of different classes |
(to see) him go |
VIII Sentence
7.1. Main characteristics of the Sentence, its notion, models of the Sentence.
7.2. Classification of sentences. Structural Approach.
7.3. Semantics of the Sentence. Relevant Model.
7.1. Main characteristics of the Sentence, its notion, models of the Sentence.
Main characteristics of the Sentence are the following:
Syntactic autonomy (the absence of grammatical indices of being included into a bigger structure: in comparison with the Word-combination which has the grammatical indices of being included into the bigger structure – the Sentence).
For example:
Him go – WC, is not an autonomic structure;
I saw him go home – a sentence, autonomic structure which includes the WC given above.
Grammatically closed structure (has only inner syntactic connections, syntactically is not connected with other sentences of the bigger structure which is the Text).
F or example:
They moved to another city. It was a new step in their life. Syntactically the two sentences in
She gave him a kiss. He took it and went away. both examples are not connected
Integrity / целостность (impossibility to divide the Simple Sentence into the unites with the same indices and functions).
F or example:
I gave him a book.
I asked him to bring a book. They are indivisible, inseparable unites. If divided, they become
I was given a book. word-combinations and loose the indices of the Sentence.
Intonation and grammatical completeness (all the necessary syntactic relations are realized).
For example:
I have brought is not a sentence, it is only a nuclear-free mutually dependent WC with
the primary predicativity of the elements of different classes.
I have brought you the good news is a sentence – all the relations are realized, the predicate
expressed by the transitive verb to bring has been completed.
Predicativity (relation of the content of the utterance presented in the form of a sentence to the Reality).
For example:
There is an unforgettable beautiful view seen from the top of the mountain (I see the view, get a motive to process this experience, process it, have some cognitive information – knowledge about the view, want to present the knowledge to another person; for that I cognitively code it into the language signs, coordinate them according to the grammatical rules and finally speak it out in my utterance in the form of a sentence).
The notion of the Sentence: the Sentence is an autonomic unity which expresses a complete thought/idea and realizes all the necessary grammatical relations and connections of the included elements (members of the Sentence).
Model of the Sentence is an etalon /standard scheme or formula which is abstract from a concrete lexical filling and includes necessary classes of words.
There are two general models of the Sentence: relative and structural (Drawing 8.1).
Relations of dependency and mutual dependency (inner syntactic connections among the components of the Sentence) are emphasized. How the elements relate in the Sentence. |
|
Positional, linear order of the words in the Sentence is emphasized. The components are studied from the point of view of their position and function in the Sentence. How the elements are ordered in the Sentence and what functions they serve because of that. |
Drawing 8.1. Two general Models of the Sentence
Positional (Structural) model implies the following structured content (Drawing 8.2).
are defined by the following indices:
