- •Contents
- •Abbreviations and acronyms
- •Introduction
- •1.1. A brief history of money laundering
- •1. Al Capone, 1920–30s
- •2. Meyer Lansky, 1930–50s
- •3. Watergate Scandal, 1973
- •1.2. The first stage: Al Capone tax evasion charges
- •Illicit earnings were mingled with receipts from the laundromat business and then paid back to the mobsters, making an impression of legitimate income
- •1.3. The subsequent stages: better hiding techniques
- •1.4. The appearance of “money laundering” expression in the legal context
- •1.5. Further development of the international aml/cft standards.
- •2.1. Basic concept of money laundering
- •2.2. Predicate offences: the scope and methods of description
- •2.3. Definition of money laundering in the narrow sense
- •2.4. Definition of money laundering in the broad sense
- •2.5. Anti-money laundering measures of combating organized crime
- •2.6. The process of money laundering
- •3.1. Key institutions of a national aml/cft regime
- •Investigation and field operations, e.G. Making searches, taking witness statements
- •3.2. Methodology bases of a risk-based approach and national coordination
- •Identify
- •Implementation
- •3.3. Financial institutions: general definition and their activities and operations related to managing clients’ assets
- •Individual
- •3.4. Financial institutions: other activities and operations
- •3.6. Risk-assessment obligations and decisions for countries
- •Information necessary for conducting aml/cft risk assessments
- •Including changes to
- •4.1. An extension liability for money laundering to the predicate offence perpetrator: the adverse implications for the economy
- •I. The perpetrator of the predicate offence is not held liable for laundering the proceeds
- •II. The perpetrator of the predicate offence is held liable for laundering the proceeds
- •4.2. Dual criminality for offences committed internationally
- •In Beta this conduct is a predicate offence for money laundering
- •In Alpha this conduct is not a predicate offence for money laundering
- •In Beta this conduct is not a predicate offence for money laundering
- •In Alpha this conduct is a predicate offence for money laundering
- •4.3. “State of mind” connected with a money laundering offence
- •Vienna Convention, Art. 2.3
- •4.4. Confiscation and provisional measures
- •Vienna Convention
- •5.1. Social and economic origins of terrorism
- •5.2. Basic concept of terrorist financing
- •5.3. Legal definition of terrorism and terrorist financing
- •Indirectly
- •Its purpose is
- •It is intended to cause
- •5.4. Characteristics of the terrorist financing offence
- •5 .5. Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism, terrorist financing and proliferation
- •6.1. The United Nations bodies of the international aml/cft framework
- •1. The United Nations Security Council (unsc)
- •2. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (unodc)
- •It is responsible for carrying out the Global Program against Money Laundering (gpml est. 1997)
- •6.2. The United Nations organizations of the international aml/cft framework
- •1. The International Monetary Fund (imf)
- •2. The World Bank
- •6.3. Main functions of the Financial Action Taskforce
- •Identifying current money laundering and terrorist financing threats
- •Identification of high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions, release of relevant public documents
- •6.6. The Wolfsberg Group of banks and its documents
- •It is an association of eleven global private banks that came together in 2000 to develop aml/cft industry standards
- •7.1. General requirements for aml/cft programs of financial institutions and groups of financial institutions
- •Including appropriate compliance management arrangements
- •Intra-group sharing of information (on customers, accounts and transactions) is required for the purposes of cdd and ml/tf risk management
- •7.2. Methodology approach to customer due diligence
- •Information accompanying wire transfers (r. 16, in)
- •Veracity
- •Verifying the customer’s identity
- •Information
- •7.3. Additional features of the customer due diligence
- •It must be ensured that documents, data and information collected are kept up-to-date
- •It may be permitted to complete the verification as soon as practically possible
- •7.4. Customer due diligence measures for legal persons and their arrangements
- •It should be required to understand the following in relation to customers that are legal persons or legal arrangements, r. 10, in, (c)
- •If different, a principal place of business
- •7.5. Actions of financial institutions in case of inability to comply with customer due diligence requirements
- •If it is not possible for a financial institution to comply with the cdd requirements
- •If there are reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are proceeds of criminal activity or are related to terrorist financing, r. 20
- •If they report their suspicions in good faith, even if they do not know precisely what the underlying activity was (they do not know whether activity was criminal)
- •7.6. Record-keeping requirements for financial institutions
- •Information obtained through the cdd measures
- •8.1. Reliance on customer due diligence information received from third parties
- •8.2. Potentially higher-risk situations for enhanced customer due diligence measures
- •It is mandatory to apply enhanced cdd measures when the fatf calls for it, r. 19
- •It was identified by a mutual evaluation, assessment or published in a follow up report
- •8.3. Lower-risk situations for simplified customer due diligence measures
- •If these requirements can ensure adequate transparence of beneficial ownership
- •It was identified by a mutual evaluation
- •8.4. Enhanced customer due diligence measures
- •Information from public databases
- •Volume of assets
- •Increasing the number and timing of controls applied
- •8.5. Simplified customer due diligence measures
- •Verify the identity of
- •Inferring the purpose and nature of the business relationship
- •9.1. Aml/cft requirements for cross-border correspondent banking relationships
- •Including whether the institution has been subject to a money laundering or terrorist financing investigation or regulatory action
- •9.2. Definition of wire transfers and activities of involved parties
- •Initiates the wire transfer and transfers the funds on behalf of the originator
- •Intermediary financial institution(s)
- •Irrespective of whether the originator and the beneficiary are the same person
- •Includes wire transfers that take place entirely with the borders of the European Economic Area (eea)
- •9.4. Aml/cft measures of information gathering related to wire transfers
- •In the absence of an account
- •9.5. Aml/cft responsibilities of financial institutions performing wire transfers
- •9.6. Aml/cft obligations for persons that provide money or value transfer services
- •If these institutions are subject to aml/cft requirements
- •10.1. Definition of politically exposed persons
- •Individuals who are (have been) entrusted with prominent public functions such as
- •It covers family members and close associates of pePs
- •It does not cover middle ranking or more junior individuals
- •10.2. Additional measures for politically exposed persons
- •In case of a higher risk
- •10.3. Aml/cft requirements for financial institutions with foreign operations
- •If aml/cft legislature of the host country does not permit the implementation of
- •If these measures are not sufficient
- •10.4. Customer due diligence and record-keeping requirements for designated non-financial businesses and professions
- •Independent legal professionals
- •Independent accountants
- •10.5. Other aml/cft requirements for designated non-financial businesses and professions
8.3. Lower-risk situations for simplified customer due diligence measures
Lower risk factors
Financial institutions may be allowed to apply simplified CDD measures
Provided there has been an adequate analysis of the risk
(a) Customer
They have effectively implemented AML/CFT requirements
For the following types of customers
They are being effectively supervised or monitored
Financial institutions and DNFBPs where they are subject to AML/CFT requirements
Public companies listed on a stock exchange and subject to disclosure requirements
If these requirements can ensure adequate transparence of beneficial ownership
Public administrators or enterprises
(c) Country
A country was identified by credible sources as
Having effective AML/CFT systems
Having low level of criminal activity, e.g. corruption
It was identified by a mutual evaluation
E.g. a single premium is less than USD/EUR 2,500; an annual premium is less than USD/EUR 1,000
(b) Product, service, transaction, delivery channel
Life insurance policies where the premium is low
There is no early surrender option
Insurance policies for pension schemes
The policy cannot be used as collateral
A pension, superannuation, etc. that provides retirement benefits to employees
Contributions are made by way of deduction from wages
The scheme rules do not permit the assignment of a member’s interest
Appropriately defined and limited financial products or services provided to certain types of customers, so as to increase accesses for financial inclusion purposes
8.4. Enhanced customer due diligence measures
Financial institutions should examine
As far as possible
Background
Purpose
Of
Complex transactions
Unusual large transactions
Unusual patterns of transactions
Where the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing are higher
The measures should be consistent with the risks identified
Occupation
Information from public databases
E.g.
Enhanced CDD measures
Obtaining
The customer
The source of funds or wealth of the customer
Volume of assets
The intended nature of the business relationship
Additional information on
Information on
Approval of senior management to commence or continue the business relationship
The reasons for intended or performed transactions
Updating more regularly the identification data of the customer and beneficial owner
Conducting enhanced monitoring of the business relationship
