- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Posterior Compartment
- •2.2 Anterior Compartment
- •2.3 Middle Compartment
- •2.4 Perineal Body
- •3 Compartments
- •3.1 Posterior Compartment
- •3.1.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.1.2 Muscles
- •3.1.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2 Anterior Compartment
- •3.2.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.2.2 Muscles
- •3.2.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Anterior Compartment
- •3.3 Middle Compartment
- •3.3.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.3.2 Muscles
- •3.3.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.3.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Middle Compartment
- •4 Perineal Body
- •References
- •MR and CT Techniques
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1 Spasmolytic Medication
- •2.3.2 Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
- •2.3.3 Dynamic Contrast Enhancement
- •3 CT Technique
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Technical Disadvantages
- •3.4 Oral and Rectal Contrast
- •References
- •Uterus: Normal Findings
- •1 Introduction
- •References
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Clinical Presentation
- •1.3 Embryology
- •1.4 Pathology
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Technique
- •2.2.1 Class I Anomalies: Dysgenesis
- •2.2.2 Class II Anomalies: Unicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.3 Class III Anomalies: Uterus Didelphys
- •2.2.4 Class IV Anomalies: Bicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.5 Class V Anomalies: Septate Uterus
- •2.2.6 Class VI Anomalies: Arcuate Uterus
- •2.2.7 Class VII Anomalies
- •References
- •Benign Uterine Lesions
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Uterine Leiomyomas
- •1.1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.1.3 Histopathology
- •1.1.4 Clinical Presentation
- •1.1.5 Therapy
- •1.1.5.1 Indications
- •1.1.5.2 Medical Therapy and Ablation
- •1.1.5.3 Surgical Therapy
- •1.1.5.4 Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE)
- •1.1.5.5 Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound
- •2 Adenomyosis of the Uterus
- •2.1 Epidemiology
- •2.2 Pathogenesis
- •2.3 Histopathology
- •2.4 Clinical Presentation
- •2.5 Therapy
- •3 Imaging
- •3.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •3.2.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technique
- •3.2.2 MR Appearance of Uterine Leiomyomas
- •3.2.3 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.4 Histologic Subtypes and Forms of Degeneration
- •3.2.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.6 MR Appearance of Uterine Adenomyosis
- •3.2.7 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.8 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.3 Computed Tomography
- •3.3.1 CT Technique
- •3.3.2 CT Appearance of Uterine Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis
- •3.3.3 Atypical Appearances on CT and Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1 Indications
- •4.2 Technique
- •Bibliography
- •Cervical Cancer
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.3 Screening
- •1.4 HPV Vaccination
- •1.5 Clinical Presentation
- •1.6 Histopathology
- •1.7 Staging
- •1.8 Growth Patterns
- •1.9 Treatment
- •1.9.1 Treatment of Microinvasive Cervical Cancer
- •1.9.2 Treatment of Grossly Invasive Cervical Carcinoma (FIGO IB-IVA)
- •1.9.3 Treatment of Recurrent Disease
- •1.9.4 Treatment of Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy
- •1.10 Prognosis
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Indications
- •2.1.1 Role of CT and MRI
- •2.2 Imaging Technique
- •2.2.2 Dynamic MRI
- •2.2.3 Coil Technique
- •2.2.4 Vaginal Opacification
- •2.3 Staging
- •2.3.1 General MR Appearance
- •2.3.2 Rare Histologic Types
- •2.3.3 Tumor Size
- •2.3.4 Local Staging
- •2.3.4.1 Stage IA
- •2.3.4.2 Stage IB
- •2.3.4.3 Stage IIA
- •2.3.4.4 Stage IIB
- •2.3.4.5 Stage IIIA
- •2.3.4.6 Stage IIIB
- •2.3.4.7 Stage IVA
- •2.3.4.8 Stage IVB
- •2.3.5 Lymph Node Staging
- •2.3.6 Distant Metastases
- •2.4 Specific Diagnostic Queries
- •2.4.1 Preoperative Imaging
- •2.4.2 Imaging Before Radiotherapy
- •2.5 Follow-Up
- •2.5.1 Findings After Surgery
- •2.5.2 Findings After Chemotherapy
- •2.5.3 Findings After Radiotherapy
- •2.5.4 Recurrent Cervical Cancer
- •2.6.1 Ultrasound
- •2.7.1 Metastasis
- •2.7.2 Malignant Melanoma
- •2.7.3 Lymphoma
- •2.8 Benign Lesions of the Cervix
- •2.8.1 Nabothian Cyst
- •2.8.2 Leiomyoma
- •2.8.3 Polyps
- •2.8.4 Rare Benign Tumors
- •2.8.5 Cervicitis
- •2.8.6 Endometriosis
- •2.8.7 Ectopic Cervical Pregnancy
- •References
- •Endometrial Cancer
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathology and Risk Factors
- •1.3 Symptoms and Diagnosis
- •2 Endometrial Cancer Staging
- •2.1 MR Protocol for Staging Endometrial Carcinoma
- •2.2.1 Stage I Disease
- •2.2.2 Stage II Disease
- •2.2.3 Stage III Disease
- •2.2.4 Stage IV Disease
- •4 Therapeutic Approaches
- •4.1 Surgery
- •4.2 Adjuvant Treatment
- •4.3 Fertility-Sparing Treatment
- •5.1 Treatment of Recurrence
- •6 Prognosis
- •References
- •Uterine Sarcomas
- •1 Epidemiology
- •2 Pathology
- •2.1 Smooth Muscle Tumours
- •2.2 Endometrial Stromal Tumours
- •3 Clinical Background
- •4 Staging
- •5 Imaging
- •5.1 Leiomyosarcoma
- •5.2.3 Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma
- •5.3 Adenosarcoma
- •6 Prognosis and Treatment
- •References
- •1.1 Anatomical Relationships
- •1.4 Pelvic Fluid
- •2 Developmental Anomalies
- •2.1 Congenital Abnormalities
- •2.2 Ovarian Maldescent
- •3 Ovarian Transposition
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •4 Benign Adnexal Lesions
- •4.1.1 Physiological Ovarian Cysts: Follicular and Corpus Luteum Cysts
- •4.1.1.1 Imaging Findings in Physiological Ovarian Cysts
- •4.1.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.2 Paraovarian Cysts
- •4.1.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.3 Peritoneal Inclusion Cysts
- •4.1.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.4 Theca Lutein Cysts
- •4.1.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.5 Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
- •4.1.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.1 Cystadenoma
- •4.2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.2 Cystadenofibroma
- •4.2.2.1 Imaging Features
- •4.2.3 Mature Teratoma
- •4.2.3.1 Mature Cystic Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.3.2 Monodermal Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4 Benign Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors
- •4.2.4.1 Fibroma and Thecoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4.2 Sclerosing Stromal Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5 Brenner Tumors
- •4.2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •5 Functioning Ovarian Tumors
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Context
- •2.2.2 Indications According to Simple Rules
- •References
- •CT and MRI in Ovarian Carcinoma
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Familial or Hereditary Ovarian Cancers
- •3 Screening for Ovarian Cancer
- •5 Tumor Markers
- •6 Clinical Presentation
- •7 Imaging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.1.2 Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- •7.1.3 Ascites
- •7.3 Staging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.3.1 Staging by CT and MRI
- •Imaging Findings According to Tumor Stages
- •Value of Imaging
- •7.3.2 Prediction of Resectability
- •7.4 Tumor Types
- •7.4.1 Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas
- •Clear Cell Carcinomas
- •Imaging Findings of Epithelial Ovarian Cancers
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Borderline Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Value of Imaging
- •Malignant Germ Cell Tumors
- •Dysgerminomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Immature Teratomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Malignant Transformation in Benign Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Sex-Cord Stromal Tumors
- •Granulosa Cell Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •Ovarian Lymphoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.4.3 Ovarian Metastases
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.5 Fallopian Tube Cancer
- •7.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •References
- •Endometriosis
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Sonography
- •3 MR Imaging Findings
- •References
- •Vagina and Vulva
- •1 Introduction
- •3.1 CT Appearance
- •3.2 MRI Protocol
- •3.3 MRI Appearance
- •4.1 Imperforate Hymen
- •4.2 Congenital Vaginal Septa
- •4.3 Vaginal Agenesis
- •5.1 Vaginal Cysts
- •5.1.1 Gardner Duct Cyst (Mesonephric Cyst)
- •5.1.2 Bartholin Gland Cyst
- •5.2.1 Vaginal Infections
- •5.2.1.1 Vulvar Infections
- •5.2.1.2 Vulvar Thrombophlebitis
- •5.3 Vulvar Trauma
- •5.4 Vaginal Fistula
- •5.5 Post-Radiation Changes
- •5.6 Benign Tumors
- •6.1 Vaginal Malignancies
- •6.1.1 Primary Vaginal Carcinoma
- •6.1.1.1 MRI Findings
- •6.1.1.2 Lymph Node Drainage
- •6.1.1.3 Recurrence and Complications
- •6.1.2 Non-squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Vagina
- •6.1.2.1 Adenocarcinoma
- •6.1.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.1.2.3 Sarcomas
- •6.1.2.4 Lymphoma
- •6.2 Vulvar Malignancies
- •6.2.1 Vulvar Carcinoma
- •6.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.2.3 Lymphoma
- •6.2.4 Aggressive Angiomyxoma of the Vulva
- •7 Vaginal Cuff Disease
- •7.1 MRI Findings
- •8 Foreign Bodies
- •References
- •Imaging of Lymph Nodes
- •1 Background
- •3 Technique
- •3.1.1 Intravenous Unspecific Contrast Agents
- •3.1.2 Intravenous Tissue-Specific Contrast Agents
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.2 Pelvic Inflammatory
- •2.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3 Hydropyosalpinx
- •2.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4 Tubo-ovarian Abscess
- •2.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.5 Ovarian Torsion
- •2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.5.3 Diagnostic Value
- •2.6 Ectopic Pregnancy
- •2.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.1 Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
- •3.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.2 Ovarian Vein Thrombosis
- •3.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.3 Appendicitis
- •3.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.3.2 Value of Imaging
- •3.4 Diverticulitis
- •3.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.5 Epiploic Appendagitis
- •3.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.5.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.6 Crohn’s Disease
- •3.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.7 Rectus Sheath Hematoma
- •3.7.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.7.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.7.3 Value of Imaging
- •References
- •MRI of the Pelvic Floor
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •3.1 Indications
- •3.2 Patient Preparation
- •3.3 Patient Instruction
- •3.4 Patient Positioning
- •3.5 Organ Opacification
- •3.6 Sequence Protocols
- •4 MR Image Analysis
- •4.1 Bony Pelvis
- •5 Typical Findings
- •5.1 Anterior Compartment
- •5.2 Middle Compartment
- •5.3 Posterior Compartment
- •5.4 Levator Ani Muscle
- •References
- •Evaluation of Infertility
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •2.1 Hysterosalpingography
- •2.1.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.1.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.1.3 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.1.5 Pathological Findings
- •2.1.6 Limitations of HSG
- •2.2.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.2.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.2.2.1 Normal and Abnormal Anatomy
- •2.2.3 Accuracy
- •2.2.4 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.2.5 Limitations of Sono-HSG
- •2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •2.3.1 Indications
- •2.3.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.3.3 Limitations
- •3 Ovulatory Dysfunction
- •4 Pituitary Adenoma
- •5 Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
- •7 Uterine Disorders
- •7.1 Müllerian Duct Anomalies
- •7.1.1 Class I: Hypoplasia or Agenesis
- •7.1.2 Class II: Unicornuate
- •7.1.3 Class III: Didelphys
- •7.1.4 Class IV: Bicornuate
- •7.1.5 Class V: Septate
- •7.1.6 Class VI: Arcuate
- •7.1.7 Class VII: Diethylstilbestrol Related
- •7.2 Adenomyosis
- •7.3 Leiomyoma
- •7.4 Endometriosis
- •References
- •MR Pelvimetry
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.3.1 Diagnosis
- •1.3.2.1 Cephalopelvic Disproportion
- •1.3.4 Inadequate Progression of Labor due to Inefficient Contraction (“the Powers”)
- •2.2 Palpation of the Pelvis
- •3 MR Pelvimetry
- •3.2 MR Imaging Protocol
- •3.3 Image Analysis
- •3.4 Reference Values for MR Pelvimetry
- •5 Indications for Pelvimetry
- •References
- •MR Imaging of the Placenta
- •2 Imaging of the Placenta
- •3 MRI Protocol
- •4 Normal Appearance
- •4.1 Placenta Variants
- •5 Placenta Adhesive Disorders
- •6 Placenta Abruption
- •7 Solid Placental Masses
- •9 Future Directions
- •References
- •Erratum to: Endometrial Cancer
Endometrial Cancer
Mariana Horta and Teresa Margarida Cunha
Contents
1 Endometrial Cancer: Background\ |
|
180 |
|
1.1 |
Epidemiology\ |
|
180 |
1.2 Pathology and Risk Factors\ |
|
180 |
|
1.3 |
Symptoms and Diagnosis\ |
|
182 |
2 Endometrial Cancer Staging\ |
|
183 |
|
2.1 MR Protocol for Staging Endometrial |
|
|
|
|
Carcinoma\ |
|
185 |
2.2 MR Findings According to the Stage |
|
|
|
|
of Endometrial Carcinoma\ |
|
187 |
3 Recent Advances in Functional MR |
|
|
|
|
Imaging in Assessing Endometrial |
|
|
|
Carcinoma\ |
|
199 |
4 |
Therapeutic Approaches\ |
|
201 |
4.1 |
Surgery\ |
|
201 |
4.2 |
Adjuvant Treatment\ |
|
202 |
4.3 |
Fertility-Sparing Treatment\ |
|
203 |
5 Follow-Up and Recurrent Endometrial |
|
|
|
|
Carcinoma\ |
|
203 |
5.1 |
Treatment of Recurrence\ |
|
204 |
The original version of this chapter was revised: The affiliation details of the authors were corrected. The erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/174_2017_91.
M. Horta (*)
Serviço de Radiologia, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil,
Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
e-mail: mariana.sf.horta@gmail.com
T.M. Cunha, M.D.
Serviço de Radiologia, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
e-mail: tmargarida@gmail.com
6 Prognosis\ |
|
204 |
Conclusion\ |
|
204 |
References\ |
|
204 |
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in well-developed countries. Biologically and clinicopathologically, endometrial carcinomas are divided into two types: type 1 or estrogen-dependent carcinomas and type 2 or estrogen-independent carcinomas. Type 1 cancers correspond mainly to endometrioid carcinomas and account for approximately 90 % of endometrial cancers, whereas type 2 cancers correspond to the majority of the other histopathological subtypes.
The vast majority of endometrial cancers present as abnormal vaginal bleedings in postmenopausal women. Therefore, 75 % of cancers are diagnosed at an early stage, which makes the overall prognosis favorable.
The first diagnostic step to evaluate women with an abnormal vaginal bleeding is the measurement of the endometrial thickness with transvaginal ultrasound. If endometrial thickening or heterogeneity is confirmed, a biopsy should be performed to establish a definite histopathological diagnosis.
Magnetic resonance imaging is not considered in the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics staging system. Nonetheless it plays a relevant role in the preoperative staging of
Med Radiol Diagn Imaging (2016) |
179 |
DOI 10.1007/174_2016_84, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland
Published Online: 17 December 2016
180 |
M. Horta and T.M. Cunha |
|
|
endometrial carcinoma, helping to define the best therapeutic management. Moreover, it is important in the diagnosis of treatment complications, in the surveillance of therapy response, and in the assessment of recurrent disease.
1\ Endometrial Cancer:
Background
1.1\ Epidemiology
Endometrial cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in females worldwide, after breast, colorectal, cervical, and lung cancers, accounting for 4.8 % of all cancers in women (Ferlay et al. 2013).
In contrast to cervical cancer, endometrioid cancer peak incidence rates occur in well-developed countries (Europe and North America), where it is the most common gynecological malignancy (Ferlay et al. 2013). This is probably due to lifestyle factors, in particular obesity, which has been linked to about 50 % endometrial cancers in these countries (Epstein and Blomqvist 2014; Calle and Kaaks 2004). The increase in life expectancy is also responsible for its rising (Koh et al. 2014).
Endometrial cancer is more likely to occur in postmenopausal women in their sixth and seventh decades, with cases only rarely reported under the age of 35 in the United Kingdom (Patel et al. 2010; Cancer Incidence Statistics 2015).
Despite its relatively high prevalence, approximately 82 % of endometrial cancers are diagnosed at an early stage, which makes its overall prognosis favorable (Cancer Incidence Statistics 2015). Its worldwide mortality rate is low and it has been estimated at 2.2 % (Ferlay et al. 2013).
1.2\ Pathology and Risk Factors
The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of uterine corpus tumors was revised in 2014 (Kurman et al. 2014). Endometrial carcinomas (also known as adenocarcinoma of the endometrium) are classified under the “Epithelial Tumours and Precursors” group and clinicopathologically divided into the following types: endometrioid carcinoma; mucinous carcinoma; serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma; serous
Table 1 World Health Organization classification of epithelial tumors and precursors of the uterine corpus
Precursors
Hyperplasia without atypia
Atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia
Endometrial cancer
Endometrioid carcinoma
Squamous differentiation
Villoglandular
Secretory
Mucinous carcinoma
Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma Serous carcinoma
Clear-cell carcinoma Neuroendocrine tumors
Low-grade neuroendocrine tumor (carcinoid tumor)
High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma)
Mixed cell adenocarcinoma Undifferentiated carcinoma Dedifferentiated carcinoma
Adapted from Kurman et al. (2014)
carcinoma; clear-cell carcinoma; neuroendocrine tumors; mixed cell adenocarcinoma; undifferentiated carcinoma; and dedifferentiated carcinoma (Table 1) (Kurman et al. 2014).
Although carcinosarcoma belongs to the “Mixed Epithelial and Mesenchymal Tumours” group of the uterine corpus, it should be staged as an endometrial carcinoma (Kurman et al. 2014).
Biologically and clinicopathologically, endometrial carcinomas are divided into two types: type 1 or estrogen-dependent carcinomas and type 2 or estrogen-independent carcinomas (Table 2).
Type 1 correspond mainly to endometrioid carcinomas and accounts for approximately 90 % of endometrial cancers, whereas type 2 cancers correspond to the majority of the other histopathological subtypes (Epstein and Blomqvist 2014).
Type 1 endometrial cancers are associated with prolonged unopposed estrogen exposure, therefore with the following risk factors: estrogen replacement therapy; tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer; polycystic ovarian syndrome; estrogen producing ovarian tumors; obesity (conversion of androgen to estrone in adipose tissue); diabetes; early menarche and late menopause and
Endometrial Cancer |
181 |
|
|
Table 2 Types of endometrial cancer
Type 1 endometrial cancer
Endometrioid carcinoma (90 %)
Mucinous carcinoma (rarely)
Commonly associated with endometrial hyperplasia
Estrogen-dependent carcinomas
Risk factors:
Estrogen replacement therapy
Tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer
Polycystic ovarian syndrome
Estrogen producing ovarian tumors
Obesity (conversion of androgen to estrone in adipose tissue)
Diabetes
Early menarche and late menopause Nulliparity
Usually diagnosed at an early stage
Good prognosis
Type 2 endometrial cancer
Other histological types, namely, serous carcinoma and clear-cell carcinoma
Generally develops in a polyp or in an atrophic endometrium (serous carcinoma)
May present with distant disease even without myometrial invasion (serous carcinoma and clear-cell carcinoma)
Usually diagnosed at a high stage
Aggressive clinical behavior
Poor prognosis
nulliparity (Shapiro et al. 1985; Fisher et al. 1994; Renehan et al. 2008; Soliman et al. 2006; McPherson et al. 1996).
Endometrioid cancers are endometrial glandular neoplasms that can be preceded or associated with endometrial hyperplasia (Kurman et al. 2014; Colombo et al. 2013). They are subdivided into three grades of differentiation (well to poorly differentiated) according to the amount of solid components (Colombo et al. 2013; Tirumani et al. 2013). Low-grade tumors are usually diagnosed at an early stage and generally have a good outcome, whereas high-grade endometrioid cancers are associated with a poor prognosis (Tirumani et al. 2013).
Endometrioid cancers are characteristically associated with PTEN, K-RAS, and CTNNB gene mutations (Tirumani et al. 2013).
Mucinous carcinomas are a rare form of type 1 endometrial cancer, where more than 50 % of glandular cells mucin can be found. They are in the majority of times well differentiated and
associated with good prognosis (Kurman et al. 2014; Jalloul et al. 2012).
Type 2 tumors are constituted by the other histological types, namely, serous carcinoma and clear-cell carcinoma (Tirumani et al. 2013; Jalloul et al. 2012). They have a more aggressive clinical behavior, a poorer prognosis, and are usually diagnosed at higher stage (Tirumani et al. 2013; Jalloul et al. 2012).
Genetics changes such as p53 and p16 inactivation genes and gene overexpression of HER-2/neu are frequently present in these types of carcinomas (Tirumani et al. 2013; Hecht and Mutter 2006).
Although classically considered estrogenindependent cancers, Setiawan and her colleagues found an overlap between risk factors of type 1 and type 2 endometrial cancers (Setiawan et al. 2013). Parity, oral contraceptives use, age at menarche, diabetes and smoking were associated with both type 2 (mainly serosal and mixed carcinomas) and type 1 cancers (Setiawan et al. 2013). The risk factors of type 2 endometrial cancer and high-grade endometrioid tumors were similar, whereas body mass index was more associated with type 1 cancer (Setiawan et al. 2013).
Serous carcinomas make up the majority of type 2 endometrial cancers. They are characterized by the presence of complex papillary architecture associated with remarkable nuclear pleomorphism (Kurman et al. 2014). They are not associated with endometrial hyperplasia, but may be preceded by serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma, a noninvasive form of carcinoma confined to the epithelium that generally develops in a polyp or in an atrophic endometrium (Kurman et al. 2014).
Clear-cell carcinoma is a rare form of type 2 cancer that resembles its ovarian counterpart (Kurman et al. 2014).
Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinomas of the endometrium are also rare types. The former is characterized by the presence of cells with no differentiation, whereas the latter is composed partially by undifferentiated type carcinoma and by International Federation of Gynaecology Obstetrics (FIGO) grade 1 or 2 endometrioid carcinoma (Kurman et al. 2014).
Mixed carcinomas are made of two or more types of endometrial carcinomas, with at least one being a type 2 carcinoma (Kurman et al. 2014).
182 |
M. Horta and T.M. Cunha |
|
|
Neuroendocrine tumors of the endometrium are extremely rare tumors.
Although they present different pathological and epidemiological features, in the latest WHO classification they have been grouped under endometrial carcinomas (Kurman et al. 2014).
Endometrial neuroendocrine tumors may be of low grade (carcinoid tumors) or of high grade (small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and large cell neuroendocrine tumors).
The majority of cases reported in the literature are of small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, which present as their lung counterpart (Lopes Dias et al. 2015).
They tend to be aggressive tumors with a poor prognosis. Women are generally in the postmenopausal age and tend to present with vaginal bleeding, but sometimes due to their aggressiveness, metastatic pain can be present (Lopes Dias et al. 2015; Eichhorn and Young 2001).
Carcinosarcomas are an admixture of carcinomatous and mesenchymal sarcomatous components (Kurman et al. 2014). Carcinomatous elements are generally high-grade endometrioid, serous, clearcell,orundifferentiatedcarcinomas.Carcinosarcomas are classified under the “Mixed epithelial and mesenchymal” group (Kurman et al. 2014). However, due to their carcinomatous component and to the fact that their risk factors present symptoms and behavior similar to those of high-grade endometrial carcinomas, they are staged as such.
The radiological and pathological appearances of these tumors tend to differ from the other histopathological endometrial cancer subtypes, as they tend to present as large hemorrhagic and necrotic masses that distend the endometrial cavity, compressing and frequently invading the myometrium and the cervical stroma. Their prognosis is poor since they tend to present lymphatic and sometimes hematogenous spread at the time of diagnosis. Recurrence is also frequent.
The majority of endometrial cancers are sporadic. Nonetheless, about 5 % of endometrial cancers are caused by genetic mutations (e.g., Lynch syndrome, Cowden syndrome). These cancers tend to occur 10–20 years before the sporadic type (Koh et al. 2014; Resnick et al. 2009).
Fig. 1 Serous endometrial carcinoma in a 59-year-old woman presenting with vaginal bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasonography detected thickening of the endometrium (arrow), which was posteriorly submitted to biopsy that diagnosed a serous endometrial carcinoma
1.3\ Symptoms and Diagnosis
About 90 % of patients with endometrial carcinoma present with abnormal vaginal bleeding (Koh et al. 2014; Colombo et al. 2013). Therefore, endometrial carcinoma is often diagnosed at an early and treatable stage, at which the prognosis is good.
Some women also seek care owing to pelvic pain or pressure (usually patients with advanced stage disease). Moreover, patients may present with atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology, which requires further evaluation for premalignant or malignant diseases of the endocervix and of the endometrium.
The first diagnostic step to evaluate women with preand postmenopausal abnormal vaginal bleeding should be the measurement of endometrial thickness with transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) (Fig. 1) (Bennet et al. 2011). Transabdominal ultrasound may also be used as an adjunct modality, particularly in large leiomyomatous uterus or when women cannot tolerate TVUS (Bennet et al. 2011).
In postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding an upper threshold of 5 mm or of 4 mm for normal endometrial thickness should be considered (Bennet et al. 2011; Gull et al. 2003; Karlsson et al. 1995; Smith-Bindman et al. 1998). In this age group, an endometrial thickness measurement