Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Теоретическая грамматика ответы (3 курс, eng).doc
Скачиваний:
54
Добавлен:
09.11.2018
Размер:
229.89 Кб
Скачать

43) Sentence analyses. Ic modal.

According to this model the sentence should be divided into “immediate constituents” where-NP-noun phrase,

VP-verb phrase, N- noun, V- verb, A-adjective, D- adverb, t- article, pr- pronoun. So this model includes the distributional model, but this model can show the difference between the abovementioned structures. Demerits- the modal sometimes cannot distinguish one sentence from another. He was easy to please

44) Transformational modal

Created by Homskii, tries to solve this problem. Thought this model includes IC model, but it goes farther. There are two kinds of sentences: kernel- basic fundamental, and transform- a deriving form from the kernel. There are two kinds of transformational rules- obligatory and optional. This model can explain the difference between the abovementioned sentences: he was eager to please and he was easy to please

45) What is the parts of sentence model

Ответ №14,15,16,17

46) The kernel sentence. Its peculiarities

Ответ № 14, 15

47) Notional parts of speech, its peculiarities

According to the view held by some grammarians, words should be divided into two categories on the following principle: some words denote things, actions, and other extra linguistic phenomena, whereas other words denote relations and connections between the notional words, and thus have no direct bearing on anything extra linguistic. Authors holding this view define prepositions as words denoting relations between words, and conjunctions as words connecting words or sentences. Actually, the so-called formal words also express something extra linguistic, prepositions express relations between things(the letter is on the table and The letter is in the table: two different relations between the two objects, the letter and the table, are denoting by the prepositions.)

In similar way, conjunctions denote connections between extra linguistic things and phenomena. Thus, in the sentence The match was postponed because it was raining the conjunctions because denotes the causal connection between two processes, which of course exist whether we choose to express it by words or not. In the sentence It was raining but the match took place all the same the conjunction but expresses a contradiction between two phenomena. The rain and the match exist in reality whether we mention it or not. It follows that the prepositions on and in, the conjunctions because and but express some relations and connections existing independently of language, and thus have a close a connection with the extra linguistic world as any noun or verb

48) general information of complex sentence

Ответ № 24

49) syntactic bond and its types, illustrate with examples

A syntactic relations between the component of the phrase is the syntactic bond. There are two theories concerning the types of syntactic bond. Professor Ilyish distinguish two main syntactical relations between component of a phrase: agreement and government

Ответ №18, 19

50) secondary members of the sentence

Ответ № 16

51. the object

It is well known that there are several types of objects and some kind of classification has to be found for them. Objects differ from one another , on the one hand , by their morphological composition , that is , by the parts of speech or phrases which perform the function of object , and on the other hand , in some cases objects modifying a part of the sentence ethxpressed by a verb form(and that is most usually the predicate)differ by the type of their relation to the action expressed by the verb ( it is to this difference that the terms “direct object” and “indirect object” are due)

Since the latter distinction applies only to a certain morphological type of objects , it will be convenient to take first the classification according to morphological differences.

From the point of view we must draw a distinction between non-prepositional and prepositional objects. Both non-prepositional and prepositional objects may sometimes be hard to distinguish from adverbial modifiers.

The classification of objects into direct and indirect ones applies only to objects expressed by nouns or pronouns (and occasionally substantivized adjectives) it has no reference whatever to objects expressed by an infinitive , a gerund or phrase. With objects of these kinds the question whether they are direct or indirect would be meaningless. But even with objects expressed by nouns or pronouns the distinction is far from being always clear.