- •Instances of classes
- •Inheritance (object-oriented programming)
- •Initial 1960s developments
- •Interval Analysis For Computer Graphics
- •2 Inclusion Functions
- •3.1.1 The Problem of Indeterminacy
- •1Would like to thartk At Barr for his support and encouragement of the publication
- •Inrez’vd.
- •Imaginary temple in its nighttime array of blues
- •Variety of different angles during the course of
- •Is ready for interpolation.
- •Internet Protocol Suite
- •Virtual private network
- •Internet
- •Integrated Logistics Support
- •Instances of classes
- •Inheritance (object-oriented programming)
- •1980S – Introduction of Macintosh in 1984:
- •Vendors sometimes migrate from one prototype platform to another midway through the development process,
- •Infrastructure have since been heavily modified to accommodate advanced and unique features such as state
- •In a more complex memory model, threads can run in their own virtual machines, and the operating system switches
- •Ideally, code design should follow the most efficient paradigm and apply different strategies in different parts of the
- •In the past, kernel architecture largely defined the operating structure of the entire system with respect to memory
- •In the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection protocol (bfd) daemon and periodic packet management process daemon
- •Instead of focusing on one technology or structure, Juniper Networks engineers evolve the Junos os protocol stack
- •Into the mainstream software line (Figure 7).
- •Interface (cli) and shared code and features, the main message is that the existing software designs were not
- •Vertical modularity solves this problem, because most os functions become abstracted from lower-level architecture
- •In Junos os, the high degree of modularity and documentation eventually took the form of the Partner Solution
- •Is where a large portion of opex resides.
- •Information, and the router operation will not be affected.
- •Is to collect the information necessary to find the problem and to fix it in the production code base. The speed and
- •In another process. For example, rsvp may accept a “poisoned” traffic engineering database from a link-state igp
- •Independently maintained and developed in different software trains. Branching is often related to poor
- •Inconsistency and delays. Junos os is not delivered in customer-specific build forms.
- •Interpretation function
- •In each case, the mov mnemonic is translated directly into an opcode in the ranges 88-8e, a0-a3, b0-b8, c6 or c7 by an assembler, and the programmer does not have to know or remember which.[5]
- •In a more commercial context, the biggest reasons for using assembly language were minimal bloat (size), minimal overhead, greater speed, and reliability.
- •Interacting directly with the hardware, for example in device drivers and interrupt handlers.
- •Video games (also termed rom hacking), which is possible via several methods. The most widely employed is altering program code at the assembly language level.
1Would like to thartk At Barr for his support and encouragement of the publication
of this research. Al Barr and Ronen Bat-d have provided many
helpful comments md suggestions. This work was funded, in part, by IBM,
Hewlett-Packard, and the National Science Foundation.
References
[ALEFW]
[BAJA88]
[KALR89]
[mm]
[MJTc91]
[MGGR66]
[MOGR79]
[M~R80]
[MUDU84]
[RATS88]
[SEGA90]
[SNYD91]
[SNYD92S]
Alcfcld, G., snd J. Hcrzberger,Intmductiun to Interval Computations,
Academic Press, New York. 1983.
Bsjsj, C., C. Hoffman, J. Hopcmft, and R. Lynch, ‘Tracing Suzface Intersections,”
CorrrputerAidedGsmncfric Oe$igrz,5, 1988, pp. 285-307.
Kalra. Dsvendw and Alm H. Barr, “Gusrsntcxd Rsy Intersections with
Implicit Surfaces,” Computer Gmphics, 23(3), July 19S9, pp. 297-304.
Mitchell, Dun, “Robust Ray Intersecticmswith Interval Azidmrctic,” Pzcceedings
Clm@ics Interface ’90, Msy 1990, pp. 68-74.
Mhchcll, Don, ‘Thee Applications of Mend Anstysis in computer
Graphics; Course Notes for Frontiers in Rendering, Siggmph ’91.
Moare, R.E., Interval Ana/ysis, Prmticc Hskl, Englewood Ckiffs, New
Jersey, 1966.
Murme, R.E., Methcxlsand Applica:iom of Interval Anafysis, StAM,
Phhdelphia.
Mourc, R.E.. “f4ew Results on Nonlinear Systcrns; in Inttwal Mathematics
/980, Karl Nickel, cd., Academic Press, New York, 19S0, W.
165-180.
Mudur, S.P,. and P,A. Koparkar“, “kntezvMatethods fc+ processingGecnretricObjects.”
/EEE CoenpulerGmphics andApplications, 4(2), Feb,
1964, pp. 7-17.
Ratschek. H. and J. RokzK,New CornputerMeMcdsforGI0601Optimization,
EUisHorwoud Limited, Chichesta, Engkmd, 1988,
Segat, Msrk, “’UsingTolerances to Guarantee Valid Polyhedral Modeling
Results,” Computer Graphics, 24(4), August 1990, pp. 105-t 14.
Snyder, John, Gewmtiw Modeling: An .4pprtxmhto High Lmel Shape
Oesignfor ComputerGraphics and CAD, Ph.D. Thssis, Cafifomia Insti-
[Uk of Technology, 1991.
Snyder, John,“GenerativeModeling: A Symbolic System for (kmnekic
Modslingu to be published in Siggmph ’92.
[SNYD92b] %ydu, John, Genemtiw hfodeling for Computer Gmphics and CAD:
[SUFF9Q]
[ITMM77]
[TOTHR5]
SYm60fiSchapeDesignUsingIntcrvalAnaIysis,mbe published by Academic
P2CSS,SU22U22C19292,
SutTem, Kevin G., and Edwatd Fsckaell. “fnteJwJ Methods in Computer
GrapMcsV Proceedingsof Ausgrsph ’90, M.lboums, Australia, 1990, pp.
35-44.
‘Tii, H.G,, Ana/ytic&ckgmwrd for ComputationofSwface lntersecfions,
Oo@s ANZ4 CompanyTechnicalMmnorsndunrCI-250-CAT-
77-0.36, April 1977,
Toth, Daniel L., “On Rsy Tracing Parametric Surfxes,” Computer
Graphics, 19(3), July 1985, pp. 171-179.
[VONH87]
[VONH89]
[VONH90]
Von Hct-zen,Brian P. and AJan H. Bazr;Accuratc .%nzplingof Defamsd,
Jmusecting Surfaces with Quadtrus,” Computer Gmp6ic$, 21(4), July
1987, pp. 103- I 10.
Vozt Hsrzen, Brian P., Applications of Surface Networks to .%npfing
Pmkdemsin Computer Graphics, Ph.D. Thesis. Cafifomia hzstitutc of
Tecturdagy, 1989,
Von Herzen, B.. AH. Barr. and HR. Zatz, ‘Geometric Collisiau for
T*Depen&nt Pwamerxic Surfaces,” Computer Gmphics, 24(4), Augusl
1990,pp. 39-48.
Appendix - A Robust Test for Global Parameterizability
Consider an rdimcnsicmsl manifold defined as he solution [o a systim of n - r cquxtiOnsin
npamnWem(r E{ O,l,.. ,,n- l)):
fl(~l!~2,..., %) = o
Jkr(xl, q,...,%) = o
~lvenamtofrpmt=iAka,A= {kl, k2, . ..lk,), andmintavat XE 1“,
we detioss subimewufof X overA ass set dependiion rpammelm fY17Y2). ..?Yrk
yj E Xk,. ~fi~ by
Thus, a subint~sl is m intervat subset of X, r of whose com-diitez area specikt
C02kSW2t. and the rest of whose CO02dinStCSu= tbc karrx3as in X.
The sokution to a system of n - r equations in n pamwrem is Cstkedgk2k47lfypammstsn”
oz61e inrherparametas indexsdby A overanintavat Xifrhemisatrnmt
one soJution to he system in my subintenak of X overA. Put - sizqrly, the system
of equations is globally parameteriz.skdeif r parameters can be fuund -h that dzsre is
at most ane sotution to the systcm for my paAculsr vahze of ths r pmametm in ths