Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Biomedical EPR Part-B Methodology Instrumentation and Dynamics - Sandra R. Eaton

.pdf
Скачиваний:
69
Добавлен:
10.08.2013
Размер:
11.5 Mб
Скачать

140 DEVKUMAR MUSTAFI AND MARVIN W. MAKINEN

Kuczera, J., Yin, D., and Karplus, M. (1998). All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B102, 3586-3616.

Makinen, M. W. and Fink, A. L. (1977). Reactivity and Cryoenzymology of Enzymes in the Crystalline State. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 6, 301-343.

Makinen, M. W., Kuo, L. C., Dymowski, J. J., and Jaffer, S. (1979). Catalytic Role of the Metal Ion of Carboxypeptidase A in Ester Hydrolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 356-366.

Makinen, M. W. and Mustafi, D. (1995). The Vanadyl Ion: Molecular Structure of Coordinating Ligands by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Spectroscopy in Metal Ions in Biological Systems, Vol. 31, H. Sigel and A. Sigel, eds., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp. 89-127.

Makinen, M. W. (1998). Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Determined Structures of Enzyme Reaction Intermediates: Structural Evidence for Substrate Destabilization.

Spectrochim. Acta. Part A, Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 54, 2269-2281.

Makinen, M. W., Mustafi, D., and Kasa, S. (1998). ENDOR of Spin Labels for Structure Determination: From Small Molecules to Enzyme Reaction Intermediates in Biological Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 14, L. J. Berliner, ed., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 181-249.

Makinen, M. W. and Brady, M. J. (2002). Structural Origins of the Insulin-Mimetic Activity of Bis(acetylacetonato)oxovanadium(IV). J. Biol. Chem. 277, 12215-12220.

Massova, I. and Mobashery, S. (1998). Kinship and Diversification of Bacterial PenicillinBinding Proteins and Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 1-17.

Matthews, B. W. (1968). Solvent Content of Protein Crystals. J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491-497. McConnell, H. M. and Chestnut, D. B. (1958). Theory of Isotropic Hyperfine Interactions

in

Radicals. J. Chem. Phys. 28, 107-117.

 

Mustafi, D. and Makinen, M. W. (1988). ENDOR-Determined Solvation Structure of

in

Frozen-Solutions. Inorg. Chem. 27, 3360-3368.

Mustafi, D., Boisvert, W. E., and Makinen, M. W. (1990a). Structure and Conformation of the Nitroxyl Spin-Label Ethyl 3-(2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolinyl-1-oxyl)-propen-2-oate Determined by Electron Nuclear Double Resonance: Comparison with the Structure of a Spin-Label Substrate of Carboxypeptidase A. Biopolymers 29, 45-55.

Mustafi, D., Sachleben, J. R., Wells, G. B., and Makinen, M. W. (1990b). Structure and Conformation of Spin-Labeled Amino Acids in Frozen Solutions Determined by Electron Nuclear Double Resonance. 1. Methyl N-(2,2,5,5-Tetramethyl-1-Oxypyrrolinyl-3-Carbon- yl)-L-Alanate, a Molecule with a Single Preferred Conformation. J. Am. Chem.Soc. 112, 2558-2566.

Mustafi, D., Wells, G. B., Joela, H., and Makinen, M. W. (1990c). Assignment of Proton ENDOR Resonances of Nitroxyl Spin-Labels in Frozen Solution. Free Radical Res. Commun. 10, 95-101.

Mustafi, D., Joela, H., and Makinen, M. W. (1991). The Effective Position of the Electronic Point Dipole of the Nitroxyl Group of Spin Labels Determined by ENDOR Spectroscopy.

J.Magn. Reson. 91, 497-504.

Mustafi, D., Telser, J., and Makinen, M. W. (1992). Molecular Geometry of Vanadyl Adenine Nucleotide Complexes Determined by EPR, ENDOR, and Molecular Modeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 6219-6226.

Mustafi, D., Boisvert, W. E., and Makinen, M. W. (1993). Synthesis of Conjugated Polyene Carbonyl Derivatives of Nitroxyl Spin-Labels and Determination of Their Molecular Structure and Conformation by Electron Nuclear Double Resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 3674-3682.

Mustafi, D. and Makinen, M. W. (1994). Catalytic Conformation of Carboxypeptidase A. Structure of a True Enzyme Reaction Intermediate Determined by Electron Nuclear Double Resonance. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4587-4595.

ANGLE-SELECTED ENDOR

141

Mustafi, D. and Nakagawa, Y. (1994). Characterization of Calcium-Binding Sites in the Kidney Stone Inhibitor Glycoprotein Nephrocalcin with Vanadyl Ions: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 11323-11327.

Mustafi, D. and Joela, H. (1995). Origin of the Temperature Dependent Isotropic Hyperfine Coupling of the Vinylic Proton of Oxypyrrolinyl Nitroxyl Spin-Labels. J. Phys. Chem. 99, 11370-11375.

Mustafi, D. and Makinen, M. W. (1995). Structure, Conformation, and Probable Mechanism of Hydrolysis of a Spin-Labeled Penicillin Revealed by Electron Nuclear

DoubleResonance Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 6739-6746.

 

Mustafi, D. and Nakagawa, Y. (1996). Characterization of

Sites in the Kidney

Stone Inhibitor Glycoprotein Nephrocalcin Using Vanadyl Ions: Different Metal Binding Properties in Strong and Weak Inhibitor Proteins Revealed by EPR and ENDOR. Biochemistry 35, 14703-14709.

Mustafi, D., Knock, M, M., Shaw, R. W., and Makinen, M. W. (1997). Conformational Changes in Spin-Labeled Cephalosporin and Penicillin upon Hydrolysis Revealed by Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 12619-12628.

Mustafi, D., Nakagawa, Y., and Makinen, M. W. (2000). ENDOR Studies of

Probing

Protein-Metal Ion Interactions in Nephrocalcin. Cell. Mol. Biol. 46, 1345-1360.

 

Mustafi, D., Sosa-Peinado, A., and Makinen, M. W. (2001). ENDOR

Structural

Characterization of a Catalytically Competent Acylenzyme Reaction Intermediate of

Wild-Type TEM-1

Confirms Glutamate-166

as the

Base

Catalyst.

Biochemistry 40, 2397-2409,

 

 

 

 

Mustafi, D., Sosa-Peinado, A.,

Gupta, V., Gordon, D. J., and

Makinen,

M. W. (2002).

Structure of Spin-Labeled Methylmethanethiolsulfonate in Solution and Bound to TEM-1 Determined by Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Spectroscopy.

Biochemistry 41, 797-808.

Nakagawa, Y., Margolis, H. C., Yokoyama, S., Kezdy, F. J., Kaiser, E. T., and Coe, F. L. (1981). Purification and Characterization of a Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate Crystal Growth Inhibitor from Human Kidney Tissue Culture Medium. J. Biol. Chem. 256, 39363944.

Nakagawa, Y., Abram, V., Kezdy, F. J., Kaiser, E. T., and Coe, F. L. (1983). Purification of the Principal Inhibitor of Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate Crystal Growth in Human Urine. J.Biol. Chem. 258, 12594-12600.

Nakagawa, Y., Otsuki, T., and Coe, F. L. (1985). Elucidation of the Multiple Forms of Nephrocalcin by P-31 NMR. FEBS Lett. 250, 187-190.

Neu, H. C. (1992). The Crisis in Antibiotic Resistance. Science 257, 1064-1073.

Paetzel, M., Danel, F., de Castro, L., Mosimann, S. C., Page, M. G. P., and Strynadka, N. C.

J. (2000). Crystal Structure of the Class D

OXA-10. Nature Struct. Biol. 7,

918-925.

 

Page, M. I. (1987). The Mechanisms of Reactions of

Antibiotics in Adv. Phys. Org.

Chem., Vol. 23, D. Bethell, ed., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, London, pp. 165270.

Pearlman, D. A., Case, D. A., Caldwell, J. W., Ross, W. S., Cheatham, T. E., Debolt, S., Ferguson, D., Seibel, G., and Kollman, P. (1995). AMBER, a Package of ComputerPrograms for Applying Molecular Mechanics, Normal-Mode Analysis, MolecularDynamics and Free-Energy Calculations to Simulate the Structural and Energetic Properties of Molecules. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 1-41.

142 DEVKUMAR MUSTAFI AND MARVIN W. MAKINEN

Pfannebecker, V., Klos, H., Hubrich, M., Volkmer, T., Heuer, A., Wiesner, U., and Spiess, H. W. (1996). Determination of End-to-End Distances in Oligomers by Pulsed EPR. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 13428-13432.

Phillips, D. C. (1967). The Hen Egg-White Lysozyme Molecule. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 57, 484-495.

Pinavaia, T. J., Marshall, C. L., Mettler, C. L., Fisk, C. L., Miles, H. T., and Becker, E. D. (1978). Alkali Metal Ion Specificity in the Solution Ordering of a Nucleotide, 5'- Guanosine Monophosphate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 3625-3627.

Prisner, T., Rohrer, M., and MacMillan, F. (2001). Pulsed EPR Spectroscopy: Biological Applications. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52, 279-313.

Rakowsky, M. H., Zecevic, A., Eaton, G. R., and Eaton, S. S. (1998). Determination of HighSpin Iron(III)-Nitroxyl Distances in Spin-Labeled Porphyrins by Time-Domain EPR. J. Magn. Reson. 131, 97-110.

Rienstra, C. M., Tucker-Kellogg, L., Jaroniec, C. P., Hohwy, M., Reif, B., McMahon, M. T., Tidor, B., Lozano-Perez, T., and Griffin, R. G. (2002). De novo Determination of Peptide Structure with Solid-State Magic-Angle Spinning NMR Spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 99, 10260-10265.

Rist, G. H. and Hyde, J. S. (1968). Ligand ENDOR of Cu-8-Hydroxyquinolate Substituted into a Single Crystal and a Powder of Phthalimide. J. Chem. Phys. 49, 2449-2451.

Rist, G. H. and Hyde, J. S. (1970). Ligand ENDOR of Metal Complexes in Powders. J. Chem. Phys. 52, 4633-4643.

Rodgers, D. W. (1997). Practical Cryocrystallography. Methods Enzymol. 276, 183-203. Rudin, M., Schweiger, A., and Gunthard, H. H. (1982). On the Electronic-Structure of N,N'-

Ethylene-bis(acetylacetonatiminato)Co(II), Co(II)Acacen. 2. ENDOR and Double ENDOR of Ligand Nuclei. Mol. Phys. 46, 1027-1044.

Saenger, W. (1984). Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, Springer Verlag, New York. Sander, M. E. and Witzel, H. (1985). Direct Chemical Evidence for the Mixed Anhydride

Intermediate of Carboxypeptidase A in Ester and Peptide Hydrolysis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 132, 681-687.

Sander, M. E. and Witzel, H. (1986). Direct Chemical Evidence for an Anhydride Intermediate of Carboxypeptidase A in Ester and Peptide Hydrolysis in Zinc Enzymes, I. Bertini, C. Luchinat, W. Maret, and M. Zeppezauer, eds., Birkhaeuser, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 207-214.

Scholes, C. P., Lapidot, A., Mascarenhas, R., Inubushi, T., Isaacson, R. A., and Feher, G. (1982). Electron Nuclear Double Resonance (ENDOR) from Heme and Histidine Nitrogens in Single-Crystals of Aquometmyoglobin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 2724-2735.

Scott, W. R. P., Hunenberger, P. H., Tironi, I. G., Mark, A. E., Billeter, S. R., Fennen, J., Torda, A. E., Huber, T., Kruger, P., and van Gunsteren, W. F. (1999). The GROMOS Biomolecular Simulation Program Package. J. Phys.Chem. A103, 3596-3607.

Smith, T. S., LoBrutto, R., and Pecoraro, V. L. (2002). Paramagnetic Spectroscopy of Vanadyl Complexes and Its Applications to Biological Systems. Coord. Chem. Rev. 228, 1-18.

Snetsinger, P. A., Chasteen, N. D., Cornelius, J. B., and Singel, D. J. (1992). Probing the Iron Center of the Low-Spin Cyanide Adduct of Transferrin by ESEEM Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. 96, 7917-7922.

Sosa-Peinado, A., Mustafi, D., and Makinen, M. W. (2000). Overexpression and Biosynthetic Deuterium Enrichment of TEM-1 for Structural Characterization by Magnetic Resonance Methods. Protein Expres. Purif. 19, 235-245.

Stryer, L. (1988). Biochemistry, 3rd edit., W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.

ANGLE-SELECTED ENDOR

143

Strynadka, N. C. J., Adachi, H., Jensen, S. E., Johns, K., Sielecki, A., Betzel, C., Sutoh, K., and James, M. N. J. (1992). Molecular Structure of the Acylenzyme Intermediate in Hydrolysis at 1.7 Å Resolution. Nature 359, 700-705.

Swartz, H. M. and Halpern, H. (1998). EPR Studies of Living Animals and Related Model Systems (In Vivo EPR) in Biological Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 14, L. J. Berliner, ed., Plenum Press, NewYork, pp. 367-404.

Sweet, R. M. and Dahl, L. F. (1970). Molecular Architecture of the Cephalosporins. Insights into Biological Activity Based on Structural Investigations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92, 54895507.

Teng, T. Y. and Moffat, K. (1998). Cooling Rates during Flash Cooling. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1, 252-257.

Togni, A., Rist, G., Rihs, G., and Schweiger, A. (1993). EPR, H-1 and C-13 ENDOR, N-14 ESEEM, and X-Ray Crystallographic Studies of Oxovanadium(IV) Bis((1R)-3-(Hepta- fluorobutyryl)Camphorate) - a Catalyst for Asymmetric Hetero-Diels-Alder Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 1908-1915.

Turley, J. W. and Boer, F. P. B. (1972). The Crystal Structure of the Nitroxide Free Radical 2,2,5,5-Tetramethyl-3-carbamidopyrroline-1-oxyl. Acta Crystallogr. B28, 1641-1644.

van Ormondt, D. and Visser, H. (1968). Ligand ENDOR of in

Phys. Lett. A26, 343-344.

Van Zele, C. J., Cunningham, M. A., and Makinen, M. W. (2001). Validation of Nitroxyl Spin-Label Force-Field Parameters through Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 22, 1113-1123.

Vocadlo, D. J., Davies, G. J., Laine, R., and Withers, S. G. (2001). Catalysis by Hen EggWhite Lysozyme Proceeds via a Covalent Intermediate. Nature 412, 835-838.

Walsby, C. J., Hong, W.,Broderick, W. E., Cheek, J., Ortillo, D., Broderick, J. B., and Hoffman, B. M. (2002). Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Spectroscopic Evidence that S-Adenosylmethionine Binds in Contact with the Catalytically Active [4Fe-4S](+) Cluster of Pyruvate Formate-Lyase Activating Enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 3143-3151.

Weiner, P. K. and Kollman, P. A. (1981). AMBER - Assisted Model-Building with Energy Refinement - a General Program for Modeling Molecules and Their Interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 2, 287-303.

Wells, G. B. and Makinen, M. W. (1988). ENDOR Determined Molecular Geometries of Spin-Labeled Fluoroanilides in Frozen Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 6343-6352.

Wells, G. B., Mustafi, D., and Makinen, M. W. (1990). Structure and Conformation of SpinLabeled Amino Acids in Frozen Solutions Determined by Electron Nuclear Double Resonance. 2. Methyl N-(2,2,5,5-Tetramethyl-1-Oxypyrrolinyl-3-Carbonyl)-L- Tryptophanate, a Molecule with Multiple Conformations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 25662574.

Wells, G. B., Mustafi, D., and Makinen, M. W. (1994). Structure at the Active-Site of an

Acylenzyme of

and Implications for the

Catalytic Mechanism. An

Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Study. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4577-4586.

Williams, R. J. P. (1985). The Symbiosis of Metal and Protein Functions. Eur. J. Biochem.

150, 231-248.

 

 

Wuthrich, K. and Connick, R. F. (1968). Nuclear Magnetic

Resonance Studies of the

Coordination of Vanadyl Complexes in Solution and the Rate of Elimination of

Coordinated Water Molecules. Inorg. Chem. 7, 1377-1388.

 

Yim, M. B. and Makinen, M. W. (1986). ENDOR Study of

Complexes in Frozen

Solutions. J. Magn. Reson. 70, 89-105.

 

144 DEVKUMAR MUSTAFI AND MARVIN W. MAKINEN

Yordanov, N. D. and Zdravkova, M. (1986). H-1 and P-31 ENDOR Studies on Powdered Samples of Magnetically Dilute Copper(II) O,O'-Disubstituted Dithiophosphate Complexes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 127, 487-491.

Yordanov, N. D., Zdravkova, M., and Shopov, D. (1986). An Improved Method for ENDOR Study of Powdered Samples. Chem. Phys. Lett. 124, 191-195.

Zabell, A. P. R. and Post, C. B. (2002). Docking Multiple Conformations of a Flexible Ligand into a Protein Binding Site Using NMR Restraints. Proteins: Struct., Func., Genet. 46, 295-307.

Zdravkova, M. and Yordanov, N. D. (1994). ENDOR Crystallography – Current Practical Applications. Appl. Magn. Reson. 6, 83-105.

Zell, A., Einspahr, H., and Bugg,

C. E. (1985). Model for Calcium-Binding to

Acid Residues

of Proteins – Crystal Structure of Calcium

Biochemistry 24, 533-537.

Zhao, D. Q. and Jardetzky, O. (1994). An Assessment of the Precision and Accuracy of Protein Structures Determined by NMR. Dependence on Distance Errors. J. Mol. Biol. 239, 601-607.

Zimmerman, S. B. (1976). X-Ray Study by Fiber Diffraction Methods of a Self-Aggregate of Guanosine-5'-Phosphate with Same Helical Parameters as Poly(Rg). J. Mol. Biol. 106, 663-672.

Chapter 5

Solution-ENDOR of Some Biologically Interesting

Radical Ions

Fabian Gerson and Georg Gescheidt

Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 80, CH-4056 Basel,

Switzerland

Abstract: A simple phenomenological treatment of the solution-ENDOR spectroscopy is presented. It is followed by a brief report on such studies carried out on some radical ions belonging to two classes of biologically interesting compounds, quinones and porphyrinoids.

1.SOLUTION-ENDOR SPECTROSCOPY

1.1Introduction

For studies of organic radicals, the by far most important multiresonance technique is electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) discovered by Feher in 1956 on a phosphorus-doped silicon system (Feher,1956; Feher, 1998). Several years later, it was applied to radicals in solution by Hyde and Maki (Hyde and Maki, 1964; Hyde, 1965; Hyde, 1974), as well as by Möbius and his colleagues (Biehl et al,, 1971; Möbius and Dinse, 1972; Möbius, 1998) who also introduced TRIPLE-resonance techniques (Biehl et al., 1975; Möbius and Biehl, 1979). The reason for the application of ENDOR spectroscopy to radicals in solution lagging behind that to paramagnetic species in solids was partly due to the lack of interest in the liquid phase by physicists who first used this technique. Even more important were problems of instrumentation. In addition to the conventional EPR apparatus and a special cavity with radiofrequency (RF) coils, the ENDOR technique requires a RF source to saturate the NMR transitions. For liquids, the RF power must be much higher than for solids, and so must be the efficiency of the cooling system (Atherton, 1979). Although ENDOR has

145

146

FABIAN GERSON AND GEORG GESCHEIDT

not attained a popularity comparable to EPR, it is now used by an increased number of research groups, especially since ENDOR accessories have become commercially available from the Varian Associates (Hyde, 1998) in the seventies and from the Bruker GmbH (Schmalbein, 1998) in the eighties. The ENDOR technique has been briefly dealt with in several early monographs on EPR spectroscopy (Ayscough, 1967; Carrington and McLachlan, 1967; Scheffler and Stegmann, 1970; Wertz and Bolton, 1972; Atherton, 1973) and, in some length, in a few books specialized in multiresonance (Kevan and Kispert, 1976; Dorio and Freed, 1979). An excellent introduction into the ENDOR technique, as used for organic radicals in solution, is to be found in a review article (Kurreck et al., 1984) and, in more detail, in a book by same authors (Kurreck et al., 1988). The latter also contains a comprehensive account of the pertinent ENDOR studies up to 1988. The physical fundamentals underlying this doubleresonance technique can be grasped by considering the so called transientENDOR effect in the way presented by Kurreck et al. and adopted in a recent monograph on EPR spectroscopy (Gerson and Huber, 2003). The following treatment is a condensed version of a section in this monograph.

1.2Physical Fundamentals

Figure 1. Schemes relevant to the transient-ENDOR effect for a paramagnetic system consisting of one unpaired electron and one magnetic nucleus with I = 1/2 and (a)

Energy levels in absence of the saturation. (b) Effect of saturation of the ESR transition on

the populations. (c) and (d) Effect of the saturation of the NMR transitions and respectively, on the populations. Reproduced partly from (Kurreck et al., 1988) and (Gerson and Huber, 2003) by permission of VCH Publishers and Wiley-VCH, respectively.

SOLUTION ENDOR OF RADICAL IONS

147

The relevant schemes are shown in Figure 1. They depict four Zeemanenergy levels which, at a given field strength, B, of the magnetic field are characteristic of a paramagnetic system consisting of one unpaired electron and one magnetic nucleus X, such as proton, with the spin-quantum number

I = 1/2 and a positive nuclear factor

The four levels,

 

and

are specified by the signs of the magnetic spin-quantum numbers,

+1/2 (spin up;

or –1/2 (spin down;

whereby the first sign applies to the

number,

of electron and the second to that,

of nucleus. The excess,

of the electron-spin population in the levels

and

relative to

 

and

 

 

required for the EPR absorption, is symbolized by four

dots,

each

dot

standing for

The Zeeman splittings are given as

frequencies,

 

for the electron and

for the nucleus, and the hyperfine-

coupling constant,

of the nucleus X also has the dimension of

Division

by

 

 

 

the gyromagnetic ratio of the electron, converts this

value in MHz into the coupling constant in mT, the unit of B. According

to the selection rules,

 

and

for the electron and

and

for the nucleus, two EPR

and

and two NMR

transitions

and

are allowed.

 

 

The schemes (a) – (d) in Figure 1 hold for

which is usually

the case with protons in

In this case, the level

lies below

and the NMR transition

has the frequency

On the other

hand, for

 

the level

is shifted below

and the

frequency of

becomes

In either case, the level

is

situated below

so that the NMR transition

 

has the frequency

 

The frequencies of the EPR transitions

and

are throughout

 

and

respectively, thus differing by

as expected.

 

In an ENDOR experiment, one EPR transition is selected for further

procedure; it is the transition

in scheme (a). After having been locked at

its frequency,

this transition is saturated by an intense microwave

(MW) irradiation. Consequently, as indicated in scheme (b), the populations

in the two levels relevant to

and

become equal. Both levels

then exhibit an excess

and the intensity of the pertinent EPR signal is

strongly reduced. In the next step, the system is subjected to an intense irradiation with radiofrequency (RF), which is scanned from 0 to higher values. At two frequencies, the NMR transitions become saturated, first at and, subsequently, at As a result, the populations in the pairs of the affected levels are equalized, as shown in schemes (c) and

(d) for the transitions

and

respectively. Saturation of the transition

leads to an excess

in each of the levels

and

while such a

148

 

FABIAN GERSON AND GEORG GESCHEIDT

process in

yields

in

and

Thus,

either of the two

saturation processes makes the population in the level

by

higher

than in so that in either case the EPR transition is desaturated, and the intensity of the EPR signal exhibits an increase, the so called ENDOR enhancement. Such an enhancement is, however, not directly verified, but its occurrence is confirmed by the NMR absorptions observed for the transitions and

1.3Spectra

Figure 2. Schematic presentation of an ENDOR spectrum arising from one nucleus X or a set of equivalent nuclei X with the coupling constant Reproduced from (Gerson and Huber, 2003) by permission of Wiley-VCH.

The ENDOR signals which arise from the NMR transitions and while scanning the RF are schematically shown in Figure 2. Contrary to the NMR experiment, their intensity is due to a population excess, of electron spins, which is by several orders of magnitude larger than the analogous excess number of nuclear spins. Thus, the sensitivity of ENDOR is much higher than that of NMR, although it is lower than that of EPR. It can readily be verified that any magnetic nucleus X or a set of such equivalent nuclei with the coupling constant gives rise to a single pair of ENDOR signals, irrespective of the nuclear spin-quantum number I and the nuclear factor This pair of signals generally appears in a separate NMR frequency range characteristic of X and For which holds for the ENDOR spectra reproduced in this chapter, the two signals appear at they are centered on the frequency, of the “free” nucleus X and separated by the coupling constant (Figure 2, top). On the other hand, for the two signals occur at they are centered on and separated by (Figure 2, bottom). The ENDOR signals can be

SOLUTION ENDOR OF RADICAL IONS

149

recorded as absorption A or as the first derivative as function of depending on whether modulation is applied to the magnetic field or to the frequency. The latter procedure was used to record the ENDOR spectra in Figures 3 – 7 shown in the following sections.

Although ENDOR is less sensitive than EPR, this deficiency is amply made good by the enormous increase in spectral resolution. As the width, of ENDOR signals (line-width) of ca. 0.3 MHz is comparable to of ca. 0.01 mT, generally achieved for EPR lines in a well-resolved spectrum of an organic radical in fluid solution, the increase in resolution by ENDOR relative to EPR spectroscopy is due to a drastic decrease in the number of lines. With each further set of equivalent nuclei X giving rise to pairs of ENDOR signals, the number of lines grows additively, and not multiplicatively as in EPR spectra. Irrespective of the number of nuclei in each set (1, 2, ... k) with the total number of ENDOR lines for k sets is thus 2k and not

A disadvantage of ENDOR spectroscopy is, that, unlike NMR, the intensity of a signal is not a reliable measure for the number of interacting nuclei giving rise to it. This is because the ENDOR enhancement and, therewith, the intensity of the ENDOR signals depends on whether the nuclear-spin relaxation responsible for the saturation of the NMR transitions

and can compete with the electron-spin relaxation effective in

saturating the selected EPR transition

Usually, the electron-spin

relaxation, which takes care of inversions of electron spins is much more efficient than the nuclear-spin relaxation which causes inversions of nuclear spins so that the former must be slowed down by appropriate experimental conditions. When cross-relaxation processes with can be neglected, as is often the case with protons in organic and bioorganic radicals, this slowing down is achieved by using viscous solvents and/or low temperatures. The ENDOR experiment is impeded by an enhanced electron-spin relaxation, e.g. in the presence of heavy nuclei (which are often contained in transition metals of bioorganic molecules) or by the dynamic Jahn-Teller effect relevant to radical with an axial symmetry (rotational axis with n equal or larger than 3) in a degenerate ground state. An enhanced electron-spin relaxation is mostly conspicuous in the corresponding EPR spectrum, as hyperfine lines are broadened and difficult to saturate.

The ENDOR technique proved to be particularly useful for radicals of low symmetry with a large number of overlapping and/or incompletely resolved EPR lines (Gerson et al., 1975). Because of its lower sensitivity, it requires somewhat larger radical concentration than EPR spectroscopy, and its application to transient radicals is, therefore, more problematic. In order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, the ENDOR spectra are usually accumulated by repeated recording and addition. Radical ions, which are