Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Modern Banking

.pdf
Скачиваний:
787
Добавлен:
10.06.2015
Размер:
8.2 Mб
Скачать

[ 78 ]

M O D E R N B A N K I N G

Figure 2.6 Ratio of total domestic bank assets to nominal GDP.

2.0

1.6

1.2 Ratio 0.8

0.4

0.0 US

J

UK

Ge

1970 to 1979

1980 to 1989 1990 to 1999

Fr

Can

Swi

Source: IMF (2000) International Finacial Statistics

Total Assets divided by Nominal GDP

1.5

1.0 Ratio 0.5

0.0 Lux

NL

Dk

Belg

Por

1970 to 1979

1980 to 1989 1990 to 1999

Sp

I

Source: IMF (2000) International Finacial Statistics

Total Assets divided by Nominal GDP

percentage of GNP have risen, which contradicts a general view that traditional banking is in decline.

Relative operating expenses in the 1990s are shown in Figures 2.8 through 2.11. Figure 2.8 illustrates that operating expenses as a percentage of total income changed little over the

[ 79 ]

D I V E R S I F I C A T I O N O F B A N K I N G A C T I V I T I E S

Figure 2.7 Ratio of total bank assets (including foreign assets) to nominal GDP.

3

2

Ratio

1

0 US

 

 

 

 

1970 to 1979

 

 

 

 

 

1980 to 1989

 

 

 

 

 

1990 to 1999

 

J

UK

Ge

Fr

Can

Swi

Source: IMF (2000) International Finacial Statistics

Total Bank Assets divided by Nominal GDP

3

2 Ratio

1

0 NL

Dk

Belg

Por

Sp

Source: IMF (2000) International Finacial Statistics

Total Bank Assets divided by Nominal GDP

1970 to 1979

1980 to 1989 1990 to 1999

I

decade; falling slightly by 1999 for 8 of the 14 countries. Beginning from a comparatively low level, the ratio increased in Portugal and Luxembourg. The opposite was the case for Belgium and France. For most of these countries, the ratio remained high through the decade, usually over 65%. Nor has the ratio changed much since the 1980s.

[ 80 ]

M O D E R N B A N K I N G

Figure 2.8 Ratio of operating expenses to gross income.

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1990

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average (1990–1999)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increment change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ratio

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US

J

UK

Fr

Ge

Can

I

Por

Sp

Dk

NL

Belg

Lux

Swi

Source: OECD Paris (2000) Bank Profitability Stafistical Supplement

Average Operating Expenses divided by Gross Income. See note on all banks

A typical ratio of staff costs to income (Figure 2.9) is about 0.35. The exceptions are the USA and Luxembourg, which averaged 0.27 and 0.21, respectively. The figures moved slightly downward over the period, except for Spain and Luxembourg. Figure 2.10 shows that average staff costs per employee rose over the decade in all countries except for Italy, where they fell slightly. The rise is consistent with the idea that more skilled staff are required as banks move into off-balance sheet activities. The differences between countries are notable. They were lowest in Portugal, the UK and the USA (averaging $33 000 to $43 000) but highest in Switzerland (about $89 000), the Netherlands ($83 000) and Japan ($78 000). The average for Germany was just under $50 000.

Figure 2.11 illustrates the average number of employees per branch in the 1990s.38 Again, there is quite a variation from country to country. Luxembourg has the highest, which corresponds to the relatively high staff costs shown in Figure 2.10. They are relatively high for the UK, largely because Britain has fewer branches in relation to population than elsewhere in Europe. Employee numbers are quite high for Japan and Switzerland, in line with their high staff costs.

Figure 2.12 gives the financial sector share of total employment through the 1990s. The share has been quite steady throughout the decade in most countries – in the UK it has not changed over the period. Switzerland has by far the highest, averaging 3.11% over the period compared to figures between 1.5 and 2% for most other countries. In Japan, the share

38 Figures for the USA are not available.

[ 81 ]

D I V E R S I F I C A T I O N O F B A N K I N G A C T I V I T I E S

Figure 2.9 Ratio of staff costs to gross income.

Ratio

1990

0.5 Average (1990–1999)

1999

Incremental change

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

−0.1 US J UK Fr Ge Can I Por Sp Dk NL Belg Lux Swi

Source: OECD Paris (2000) Bank Profitability Stafistical Supplement

Average Staff Cost divided by Average Gross Income for all Banks. See note on all banks

Figure 2.10 Average staff costs per employee.

Costs per Employee (Thousands)

 

1991

 

1999

120

Average (1990–1999)

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US

J

UK

Fr

Ge

Lux

Swi

Sp

Dk

NL

Belg

I

Por

Source: OECD Paris (2000) Bank Profitability Statistical Supplement

Average Staff Costs divided by Average Employees (1991–1999). See note on all banks

[ 82 ]

M O D E R N B A N K I N G

Figure 2.11 Number of employees per branch.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1990

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average (1990–1999)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

 

 

Branch

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increment change

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

per

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J

UK

Fr

Ge

I

Por

Sp

Dk

NL

Belg

Lux

Swi

Source: OECD Paris (2000) Bank Profitability Statistical Supplement

Average Number of Employees divided by the Average Number of Branches.

See notes on all banks

Figure 2.12 Financial sector share of total employment.

Employment in Sector (%)

3.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

1991

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average 1990–1999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US

J

UK

Ge

Fr

Swi

I

Sp

Belg

Dk

NL

Source : OECD Economic Outlook 2000 & IMF (2000) International Financial Statistics

Average Employment by Banks per Total Employment (1991–1999) Financial Sector comprises of Financing, Insurance, Real Estate and Business Services

[ 83 ]

D I V E R S I F I C A T I O N O F B A N K I N G A C T I V I T I E S

is exceptionally low, averaging just 0.60% for the decade. It should be stressed that these figures relate to the financial sector as a whole, and not just banking.

A final exercise is to review the relative share price performance of banks, which gives an idea of what the markets think about the future prospects of banks compared to other sectors. Figures 2.13 through 2.15 show the performance of a bank share price index against the general market index for the USA, UK and Europe, based on the share price at the beginning of each month. The longest series is for the USA, for 1976 – 2001. With the exception of the mid-1980s, the US share prices were below the general share price index from the 1970s until about 1992, when they began to track the index in most years, rising above it in 2002. The performance of US investment banks was more volatile, but with the exception of 1999 – 2000 they outperformed the general price index from 1998 onwards.

UK banks consistently underperformed against the FTSE 100 until January 1994. From the beginning of 1996, banks do better than the blue chip firms, suggesting investors have a more favourable view of the prospects for British banks.

The European bank index is available from 1987 onwards (see Figure 2.15). Bank share prices closely track the index, until January 1994. The bank share price index is below the general index through most of the period 1994 – 2001, then more or less tracks the index through to 2003.

A special index for Japanese banks (Figure 2.16) begins in 1989; it was in December 1989 that the stock market began a steady decline which lasted over a decade and began to show signs of recovery in 2003, the time this book was written. It is unclear whether or not this is the beginning of a sustained recovery. From the information on the Japanese

Figure 2.13 US bank indices compared to the S&P500 index.

Index in Log Scale

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

Corresponding

index values:

1976–2003

4860

3200

1600

800

400

200

100

50

1976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S&P500 index

 

Datastream Allbanks index

Datastream Investment banks index

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Datastream.

[ 84 ]

M O D E R N B A N K I N G

Figure 2.14 UK bank index compared to the FTSE100 index.

 

Corresponding

1986–2003

index values:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10380

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6400

Scale

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3200

inLog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1600

Index

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

800

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

 

 

 

 

 

FTSE350banks index

 

 

 

 

FTSE100 index

 

 

 

Source: Datastream.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2.15 European bank index compared to the Eurostoxx index.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corresponding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1987–2003

 

 

index values:

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200

Scale

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

inLog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Index

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

 

 

 

 

 

Eurostoxx Banks index

 

 

 

Eurostoxx index

 

Source: Datastream.

[ 85 ]

D I V E R S I F I C A T I O N O F B A N K I N G A C T I V I T I E S

Figure 2.16 Japanese Nikkei 500 banking index compared to the Nikkei 225 index.

 

Corresponding

1989–2003

index values (in Y):

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40000

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scale

9.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10000

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Log

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

in

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Index

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2500

7.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1000

 

6.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

 

 

Nikkei 500 stock avg Banking

 

Nikkei 225 stock avg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Datastream.

bank index in Figure 2.16, it is clear that investors take a dim view of the prospects for the Japanese banking sector – the index consistently underperforms the Nikkei 225 throughout the period. This result is exactly what would be expected, given the severity of the problems experienced by Japanese banks over the last decade. The Japanese case is analysed in some detail in Chapter 8.

2.6.1. Turning Threats into Opportunities

The figures on the performance of banks are mixed. While profitability was fairly static, it appears banks are looking for other sources of income by expanding into non-interest income areas. However, the ratio of cost to income remained largely unchanged, and average costs per employee rose through the 1990s. During the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s, the share price performance of banks was relatively poor when compared against general price indices in the USA, UK, Japan and Europe. From the mid to late 1990s, British commercial and US investment bank share price performance improved, though the latter was somewhat volatile. By the new century, US, EU and UK banks were either tracking or outperforming the relevant index, suggesting investors have a more positive outlook with respect to banks’ future prospects. Japanese banks are the notable exception to this trend. There are several major changes which the existing highly capitalised banks can (and must) turn into opportunities if they are to survive. They are by no means independent, and include electronic and financial innovations including the introduction

[ 86 ]

M O D E R N B A N K I N G

of ‘‘e-cash’’, the growth of ‘‘non-banks’’ and the trend towards consolidation within national banking sectors.

New technology and innovation

Begin with the emergence of electronic (e-cash) or digital cash and assume, for the moment, that it has replaced currency in circulation – a cashless society [the likelihood of the advent of a cashless society is discussed later in the section]. Based on the development of technology to date, e-cash can consist of stored value cards, network money and e-wallets. Stored value cards store prepaid funds electronically on a chip in the card. Mondex39 and Visa Cash are good examples. The ‘‘smart card’’ is another example of a stored value card, used widely in some parts of Continental Europe. Customers can download cash from their accounts into the card, so they can be used like cash, but are more secure than cash because personal information is stored in the chip, so only the owner can use the card. The reduced chance of fraud (compared to a debit or credit card) makes them attractive to customers and shop owners alike.

Network money is also prepaid but stored on a computer hard disc and transferred between agents via some network such as the internet. Also, assume agents use the e-cash to purchase goods and services by post, the internet or at physical shops. The e-wallet is an electronic version of a credit or debit card. Money is transferred from an individual’s account to the e-wallet, which can be used for internet purchases. All transactions can be traced back to the owner because the e-wallet contains the information.

Some experts have questioned whether the bank intermediary function will be challenged by the growth of e-cash. In this hypothetical world, could the presence of e-cash make banks redundant in the provision of core banking functions? To answer this question, consider each of these functions in turn. First, take payments facilities. To quote King (1999):

‘‘. . .there is no conceptual obstacle to the idea that two individuals engaged in a transaction could settle by a transfer of wealth from one electronic account to another in real time. . .

Eligible assets would be any financial assets [with] a market clearing price in real time. . . the key to such developments is the ability of computers to communicate in real time. . . enabling private sector real time gross settlement.’’ (p. 48)

King is referring to the settlement of transactions – there is no mention of credit. As Freedman (2000) stresses, the world of settlement envisaged by King would require a population of 6 billion having accounts, with funds transferred between them via the purchase or sale of assets.

39 Mondex is an electronic purse – it uses a smart card to store electronic cash. Smart cards have a microchip rather than a magnetic stripe. The chip can store a large amount of information. It is not easily copied (unlike a strip), reducing the opportunity for fraud. An ATM or adapted telephone transfers cash from a bank account to the card. Retailers use a terminal to download cash from the card. A number of pilots took place in the late 1990s – some successful, some not. NatWest has sold all but 5% of Mondex to other firms. Mastercard International bought a 51% shareholding in 1997. Mondex trials in Swindon (UK), Guelph (Canada) and Hong Kong failed. See Tomkin and Baden-Fuller (2000).

[ 87 ]

D I V E R S I F I C A T I O N O F B A N K I N G A C T I V I T I E S

Central banks play an important role in the settlements function. Most of the daily payments made by the household, business and government sectors involve a claim on a bank, and through a given working day, net payments are made to and received from the different banks. Some banks will find their settlement balances at the central bank have increased, others will have declined because they have experienced a net outflow of payments. Banks will use each other or the central bank to ensure their settlement balances at the central bank are kept at some minimum level. The central bank has assumed this role for numerous reasons. It issues the currency, and therefore cannot fail, and it also acts as lender of last resort.40 However, in the event of real time transfers, payments between banks would no longer be necessary (for the reasons given above) and this settlements function could, in theory, disappear.

Turning to the other core functions of the bank, taking deposits and making loans, the chance of banks being replaced is even more remote. With the most advanced technology the chances are slim, because of the time and cost of collecting the information required to locate the optimal place for a deposit, to pool risks with other depositors or to locate the most suitable borrower(s). Any software programme written to undertake these tasks is only as good as its author, and will quickly become dated. Banks are likely to be able to sustain a competitive advantage in an e-cash world because it would be more costly for individuals to replicate the banks’ global risk and information pooling role.

Banks also provide liquidity as a service to their customers. Though technology makes it possible to procure on-line liquidity in the absence of a third party intermediary, changes in liquidity preferences are a different matter. Suppose suitable borrowers are found for depositors, and a term of repayment dates, with interest, is agreed. During the term of agreement, the position of one party is altered: he/she wants the cash earlier or later than agreed. Banks, with a large pool of funds, are able, at a relatively low cost, to satisfy any changes in preferences and to profit from it, either by charging a penalty rate of interest on loan extensions or by reducing the interest paid on deposit, but in cyberspace, in the absence of an intermediary, satisfying changes in consumer preferences becomes far more difficult and costly.

However, the dominance of the payments system by major banks is under threat. Traditionally, the payments system has been a by-product of intermediation, which facilitates the transfer of credits and debits between agents. The growth of electronic delivery of core banking services has already given rise to the emergence of a payments system independent of banks. PayPal is a California-based company that offers business and personal customers a secure means of sending and receiving payments via email. Customers use PayPal if they are reluctant to provide credit card details to unknown internet merchants. Also, for tiny internet firms that cannot afford the cost of offering credit or debit card facilities, PayPal credits them for any purchases made via PayPal. PayPal takes the credit card number and pays for any item on behalf of the customer. Its main source of revenue is fees earned from transactions charges. Its early success was largely due to one major customer – PayPal arranges payments on behalf of e-Bay, an electronic auction site with

40 Another reason would be the traditional use of reserve ratio as a monetary policy tool, which has been abandoned in the developed economies.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]