Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Учебный год 22-23 / HUMAN RIGHTS IN PRIVATE LAW.pdf
Скачиваний:
3
Добавлен:
14.12.2022
Размер:
1.24 Mб
Скачать

HUMAN RIGHTS IN PRIVATE LAW

Human Rights

in Private Law

Edited by

DANIEL FRIEDMANN

and

DAPHNE BARAK-EREZ

OXFORD—PORTLAND OREGON 2001

Hart Publishing

Oxford and Portland, Oregon

Published in North America (US and Canada) by Hart Publishing c/o

International Specialized Book Services

5804 NE Hassalo Street

Portland, Oregon 97213-3644 USA

Distributed in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg by Intersentia, Churchillaan 108

B2900 Schoten

Antwerpen

Belgium

© The Editors and Contributors severally 2001

The contributors to this work have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, to be identified as the authors of this work

Hart Publishing is a specialist legal publisher based in Oxford, England. To order further copies of this book or to request a list of other publications please write to:

Hart Publishing, Salter’s Boatyard, Folly Bridge,

Abingdon Road, Oxford OX1 4LB Telephone: +44 (0)1865 245533 or Fax: +44 (0)1865 794882

e-mail: mail@hartpub.co.uk WEBSITE: http//www.hartpub.co.uk

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Data Available

ISBN 1–84113–213–6 (cloth)

Typeset by Hope Services (Abingdon) Ltd. Printed and bound in Great Britain on acid-free paper by

Biddles Ltd, www.biddles.co.uk

Acknowledgments

This collection of articles by scholars from six countries (England, Germany, the United States, Canada, South Africa and Israel) originated at a conference held at the Faculty of Law of Tel-Aviv University in May 2000, under the auspices of the Minerva Center for Human Rights. We are grateful to the contributors and to those who attended the conference and chaired the sessions, as well as to the Minerva Center for its support. We are particularly grateful to our students who helped us in the editing process. Gal Levita acted as our deputy editor and offered invaluable help in the various stages of editing. Adi Aron, Nissim Gez, Hadassa Greenberg and Limor Heled were dedicated and greatly assisted us in preparing the book for publication. We would also like to thank Ms. Dana Rothman for assistance in the English editing and Ms. Yael Amitz-Lev for her administrative assistance.

DANIEL FRIEDMANN

DAPHNE BARAK-EREZ

Contents

Contributors

ix

Abbreviations

xi

Table of Cases

xiii

1.

Introduction

 

 

Daniel Friedmann and Daphne Barak-Erez

1

 

Part I: Constitutional Values and Private Law—

 

 

The Theoretical Framework

 

2.

Constitutional Human Rights and Private Law

 

 

Aharon Barak

13

3.

Constitutional Values and Private Law in Canada

 

 

Lorraine E. Weinrib and Ernest J. Weinrib

43

4.

Determining the Stakes: Binding and Non-binding Bills of Rights

 

 

Anton Fagan

73

5.Human Rights and Private Law in German Constitutional Development and in the Jurisdiction of the Federal Constitutional Court

Christian Starck

97

6. Importing Constitutional Values through Blanket Clauses

 

Andreas Heldrich and Gebhard M. Rehm

113

Part II: The Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights

7.The Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Tort and Contract Law

Hugh Beale and Nicola Pittam

131

8.The European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and German Private Law

Reinhard Ellger

161

Part III: Contract and Property Law

 

9. Freedom of Contract, Human Rights and Human Dignity

 

Roger Brownsword

181

viii Contents

 

10. Equality of Opportunity and Private Law

 

Peter Benson

201

11.Property Rights, Public Policy and the Limits of the Legal Power to Discriminate

Amnon Reichman

245

Part IV: Labour Law

 

12. Enforcement of Employment Contracts and the Anti-Slavery Norm

 

Todd D. Rakoff

283

13.Human Rights and the Employment Relationship: A Look Through the Prism of Juridification

 

Guy Mundlak

297

 

Part V: The Law of Torts

 

14.

Negligence and Human Rights: Reconsidering Osman

 

 

Ewan McKendrick

331

15.

Horizontal Equality and the Law of Torts

 

 

Ofer Grosskopf

357

16.

Privacy in the Digital Age: Vanishing in Cyberspace?

 

 

Gebhard M. Rehm

373

Index

389

Contributors

Aharon Barak, President of the Supreme Court, Israel

Daphne Barak-Erez, Associate Professor and Vice Dean, Faculty of Law, TelAviv University, Israel

Hugh Beale, Professor of Law, Warwick University, and Law Commissioner, England

Peter Benson, Professor of Law, University of Toronto, Canada

Roger Brownsword, Professor of Law and Head of the Department of Law, University of Sheffield, England

Reinhard Ellger, Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Privatrecht, Hamburg, Germany

Anton Fagan, Lecturer, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Daniel Friedmann, Danielle Rubinstein Professor of Comparative Private Law, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

Ofer Grosskopf, Lecturer, The College of Management, Israel

Andreas Heldrich, Professor of Law, Rector, University of Munich, Germany Ewan McKendrick, Professor of English Private Law, University of Oxford,

Fellow of Lady Margaret Hall, England

Guy Mundlak, Senior Lecturer, Tel Aviv University, Israel Nicola Pittam, Law Commission, England

Todd D. Rakoff, Byrne Professor of Administrative Law and Dean of the J.D. Program, Harvard University Law School, USA

Gebhard M. Rehm, University of Munich, Germany

Amnon Reichman, University of Toronto, Canada

Christian Starck, Professor of Law, Chair of Public Law, Georg-August- University, Göttingen, Germany

Ernest J. Weinrib, University Professor and Cecil A. Wright Professor of Law, University of Toronto, Canada

Lorraine E. Weinrib, Professor of Law, University of Toronto, Canada

 

Abbreviations

AG

Amtsgericht (Magistrate´s Court)

BAGE

Entscheidungen des Bundesarbeitsgerichts (Decisions of the

 

German Federal Labour Court)

Bd

Band (Volume)

BGB

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (German Civil Code)

BGBl

Bundesgesetzblatt (Official Journal of Federal Statutes)

BGE

Entscheidungen des schweizerischen Bundesgericht (Decisions of

 

the Swiss Federal Court)

BGHZ

Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofes in Zivilsachen

 

(Decisions of the German Supreme Court in civil matters)

BRAK-Mitt

Mitteilungen der Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer (Federal Bar Journal)

BverfG

Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court)

BverfGE

Entscheidungen des BverfG (Decisions of the Federal

 

Constitutional Court)

Col

Column

ECHR

European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental

 

Freedoms

ECtHR

European Court of Human Rights

EMRK

Europäische Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und

 

der Grundfreiheiten (ECHR)

EuGRZ

Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift

FamRZ

Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht

FH

Further Hearing (Supreme Court of Israel)

GG

Grundgesetz (Basic Law—German Constitution)

HC

High Court (Israel)

JuS

Juristische Schulung

JZ

Juristenzeitung

LG

Landgericht (County Court)

LSI

Laws of the State of Israel

NLC

National Labour Court (Israel)

NJW

Neue Juristische Wochenschrift

NJW–RR

Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, Rechtsprechungsreport

OLG

Oberlandesgericht (German Court of Appeal)

PD

Decisions of the Supreme Court of Israel

PDA

Decisions of the National Labour Court (Israel)

RabelsZ

Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales

 

Privatrecht

RGBl

Reichsgesetzblatt

Table of Cases

 

 

A v. UK (1998) 27 EHRR 611 ..............................................................

134, 140

AES System Inc v. Saar 54(3) PD 850 ............................................................

 

22

AG Kamen, 13 April 1995, 1077..................................................................

 

169

AG Kamen, 4 August 1995 [1996] NJW-RR 199..........................................

 

169

AG Tauberbischofschofsheim, 8 May 1992 [1992] NJW-RR 1089

...............

171

Ahmad v. ILEA [1978] QB 36 .....................................................................

 

135

Airey, 9 October 1979, (ECtHR) Series A Nr 32 [1979] EuGRZ 626, 629

.....167

Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992] 1 AC 310 ...................

 

343

Alexandrou v. Oxford [1993] 4 All ER 328 ..........................................

143, 335

Allnut v. Inglis (1810) 12 East 527; 104 ER 206 ............................................

 

251

A.M. v. Ryan [1997] 1 SCR 157....................................................................

 

66

Amlgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza,

 

Inc. 391 US 308 (1968) ............................................................................

 

237

Amod v. Multilateral Vehicle Accidents Fund [1999] 4 SA 1319 (SCA) ..........

95

Ancell v. McDermott [1993] 4 All ER 355 ...................................................

 

143

Anns v. London Borough of Merton [1978] AC 728; [1977] 2 WLR 1024;

[1977] 2 All ER 492..........................................................................

141, 142

Anon (1589) Owen 34; 74 ER 880 ...............................................................

 

267

Arthur J.S. Hall & Co (a firm) v. Simon [2000] 3 WLR 543;

 

 

[2000] 3 All ER 673 ..................................................................

152, 340, 341

Arundel v. Trevillian (1635) 1 Rep Ch. 87; 21 ER 515..................................

 

267

Ashby v. White (1703) 2 Ld Raym 938; 92 ER 126.........................

204, 228, 264

Association Newspapers Group v. Wade [1979] 1 WLR 697........................

 

135

Attorney General v. Barker [1990] 3 All ER 257 ..........................................

 

189

Baggett v. Bullitt 377 US 360 (1964) ............................................................

 

376

Baggs v. UK (1985) 44 DR 13......................................................................

 

153

Bailey v. State of Alabama 219 US 219 (1911) ...............................

286, 290, 294

Baird v. State Bar of Arizona 401 US 1 (1971)..............................................

 

376

Baker v. Pleasant (1989) 89 NSR (2d) 301 .....................................................

 

62

Baker v. White (1690) 2 Vern. 215; 23 ER 740 .............................................

 

267

Barclays’ Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 AC 180 .................................................

 

157

Barrett v. Enfield London Borough Council [1999] 3 WLR 79 ......

145, 152, 182,

338, 340, 348, 353, 354, 355

Barthold, Series A Nr 90 (ECtHR) [1985] GRUR Int 468.............................

 

172

Beit Yules v. Raviv 43(1) PD 441 ...........................................................

 

40, 309

Belgian Linguistics, 23 July 1968, Series A Nr 6 (ECtHR) [1968]

 

 

EuGRZ 298, 300.....................................................................................

 

166

xiv Table of Cases

 

 

 

Best v. Samuel Fox Ltd [1952] AC 716 (HL)..................................................

 

 

62

Beverly Glen Music, Inc. v. Warner Communications, Inc. (1986) 178 Cal.

App. 3d 1142; 224 Cal. Rptr. ...........................................................

 

 

260, 291

Bevugnee v. City of Tel Aviv 32 (1) PD 404...................................................

 

 

17

Blachford v. Preston (1799) 8 TR 89; 101 ER 1282.......................................

 

 

268

Blathwayt v. Lord Cawley [1975] 3 All ER 625 ...............................

 

68, 135, 277

Board of Governors of Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology v.

Bhadauria (1981) 124 DLR (3d) 193.......................

63, 65, 203, 204, 207, 208,

220, 223, 225, 227, 228, 242, 272, 276, 279

Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 .........

139

Bolt v. Stennet (1800) 8 Term. Rep. 606; 101 ER 1572

.................................

 

250

Bolton v. Mahadeva [1972] 1 WLR 1009.....................................................

 

 

159

Brindle v. Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, 29 March 1999,

 

unreported .............................................................................................

 

 

149

British Columbia Government Employees Union v. British Columbia [1988] 2

SCR 214...................................................................................................

 

 

26

Burgess v. Clements (1815) 4 M & S 306 .....................................................

 

 

232

BGH, 11 October 1994, 127 BGHZ 195 ......................................................

 

 

126

BGH, 2 December 1998, 140 BGHZ 118 .....................................................

 

 

121

BVerfG, 15 January 1958, 7 BverfGE 198, 204, 205 (Lüth).............

161, 162, 163

BVerfG, 15 December 1965, 19 BVerfGE, 342, 347 ......................................

 

 

164

BVerfG, 19 July 1967, 22 BVerfGE 254, 265 ................................................

 

 

164

BVerfG, 15 April 1969, 25 BVerfGE 327, 331 ..............................................

 

 

164

BVerfG, 31 January 1973, 34 BVerfGE 238, 245 ..........................................

 

 

117

BVerfG, 16 May 1973, 35 BVerfGE 311 ......................................................

 

 

164

BVerfG, 5 June 1973, 35 BVerfGE 202, 219 .................................................

 

 

117

BVerfG, 11 May 1976, 42 BVerfGE 143, 148 ...............................................

 

 

123

BVerfG, 19 June 1979, 51 BVerfGE 304, 323 ...............................................

 

 

162

BVerfG, 25 July 1979, 52 BVerfGE 131, 173 ................................................

 

 

175

BVerfG 22 August 1979, 73 BVerfGE 261, 269.............................................

 

 

162

BVerfG, 3 June 1980, 54 BVerfGE 148, 152 .................................................

 

 

117

BVerfG, 24 March 1981 [1981] FamRZ 429 ................................................

 

 

168

BVerfG, 11 November 1981, 58 BVerfGE 377, 398 ......................................

 

 

117

BVerfG, 4 May 1982, 60 BVerfGE 348, 357 .................................................

 

 

162

BVerfG, 8 July 1982, 61 BVergGE 82, 101 ...................................................

 

 

161

BVerfG, 12 January 1983, 63 BVerfGE 45, 67..............................................

 

 

162

BVerfG, 19 October 1983, 65 BVerfGE 196, 215..........................................

 

 

162

BVerfG, 15 December 1983, 65 BVerfGE 1, 41 ............................................

 

 

117

BVerfG, 16 October 1984, 67 BVerfGE 329, 341..........................................

 

 

117

BVerfG, 31 October 1984, 68 BVerfGE 193, 205..........................................

 

 

161

BVerfG, 8 October 1985, 70 BVerfGE 297, 317............................................

 

 

162

BVerfG, 26 March 1987, 24 BVerfGE 358, 370..............................

 

164, 165, 167

BVerfG, 7 February 1990 [1990] JZ 691, 692 ........................................

 

 

162, 177

BVerfG, 29 May 1990, 82 BVerfGE 106, [1990] NJW 2741 ..........................

 

164

 

 

Table of Cases

xv

BVerfG, 7 May 1991 [1991] FamRZ 913, 915

..............................................

 

168

BVerfG, 11 June 1991, 84 BVerfGE 192, 195 ...............................................

 

 

162

BVerfG, 19 October 1993, 89 BVerfGE 214, 232...................................

122, 128

BVerfG, 7 March 1995, 92 BVerfGE 158, 176 .........[1995] FamRZ 789, 792

170

BVerfG, 21 February 2000 [2000] NJW 2495...............................................

 

 

122

Canada Trust Co, Re v. Ontario Human Rights Commission

 

(1990) 69 DLR (4th) 321 (Ont. CA)...............

63, 64, 67, 68, 69, 227, 246, 260,

 

261, 272, 273, 274, 276, 277, 279

Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC ................605

343, 346, 352, 355

CBC v. Dagenais [1994] 3 SCR 835...............................................................

 

 

19

Cheall v. APEX [1982] 3 All ER 855; [1983] QB ..........126; [1983] 2 AC 180

135

Chesterfield v. Janssen (1750) 1 Atk. 339; 26 ER ...................................191

 

266

Christie v. York Corporation (1940) 1 DLR 81 (SCC);

 

 

[1940] SCR 139 ..........................................................................

 

65, 245, 278

CIBC Mortgages plc v. Pitt [1994] 1 AC 200................................................

 

 

157

City of Jerusalem v. Gordon 39(1) PD 113 ....................................................

 

 

22

Clunis v. Camden and Islington HA [1998] 3 .............................All ER 180

 

153

Clyatt v. United States 197 US 207 (1905)....................................................

 

 

289

Cole v. Gibson (1750) 1 Vern. Sen. 503, 27 ER ....................................1169

 

267

Constantine v. Imperial London Hotels, Ltd [1944] 2 All ER 171;

 

[1944] 1 KB 693 ...............................................................................

 

233, 248

Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (1994) 120 DLR (4th) 12

 

(SCC).......................................................................................................

 

 

57

Daily Air Staff Committee v. Chazin 4 PDA 365 ...........................................

 

37

Dan Frumer and Checkpoint Software Technologies v. Redguard

 

23 PDA 294 ............................................................................................

 

 

310

Darker v. Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [2000]

 

3 WLR 747 .......................................................................

 

338, 339, 340, 341

Davenant v. Hurdis (1598) Moore 576; 72 ER .......................................769

 

268

Davis v. Radcliffe [1990] 1 WLR 821 ..........................................................

 

 

142

Depue v. Flatau 100 Minn. 299, 111 NW 1 (1907) .......................................

 

253

Dobson v. Dobson (1999) 174 DLR (4th) 1 (SCC) ..............................

67, 69, 70

Doe v. Bridgeton Hospital Association (1976) 366 A 2d 641 (SNJ);

 

71 NJ 478 (1976), cert den, 433 US 914, 97 S Ct 2987 53 L Ed 2d 1100

 

(1977) ......................................................................................

 

235, 236, 242

Donnelly v. Chief Constable of Lincolnshire, unreported,

 

 

QBD, 26 July 2000..................................................................................

 

 

342

Dorset Yacht v. Home Office [1970] AC 1004, .....................................222, 353

Douglas v. Hello! Ltd [2001] 2 WLR 992.....................................................

 

 

135

Drummond Wren, Re [1945] 4 DLR 674 (Ont HC),........................63, 277, 278 Du Plessis v. De Klerk [1996] 3 SA 850 (CC), ...................44, 73, 91, 92, 94, 136

xvi Table of Cases

 

 

 

Easteronix Inc. v. Grafunkel 25 PDA 456 ....................................................

 

309

Economic Corporation to the Development of Kfar Mandah (1997) Inc. v.

Muhamad Zaidan (unpublished, 2000) ...................................................

 

309

“Eged” Aguda Shituphit v. Izhak Messiah 48(2) PD 66..................................

35

Egerton v. Earl Brownlow (1853) 4 HLC 1, 195-6; 10 ER 359, 436-7

 

(HL) .............................................

262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 269, 270, 274, 278

Eldridge v. British Columbia (AG) [1997] 3 SCR 624...................................

259

Elguzouli-Daf v. Commissioner of Police [1995] 2 WLR 173........................

144

Evans v. Abney 396 US 435 (1970) ................................................................

 

 

27

Evans v. Newton, 382 US 296 (1966)...........................................................

 

 

255

Federal Commerce and Navigation Co Ltd v. Tradax Export SA (The

 

Marathon Envoy) [1978] AC 1................................................................

 

 

185

Fender v. Mildmay [1937] 3 All ER 403; [1938] AC 1 ...........................

185, 271

Fox v. Fox Estate (1996) 28 Ont Rep 496 (CA).......................................

 

68, 277

Frame v. Smith (1987) 42 DLR (4th) ...........................................................

 

 

203

Franklin v. Evans (1924) 55 OLR 349 (KB).............

245, 246, 260, 261, 262, 263,

 

265, 267, 268, 269, 270, 272, 279, 363

Gallagher v. Berrow Wood School Ltd, 7 October 1999, unreported............

151

Gardener v. Whitaker [1995] 2 SA 672 (E) ....................................................

 

90

Garfine v. Monmouth Park Jockey Club, 29 NJ 47, 148 A 2d 1 (1959) .........

252

Gissler Inc. v. Cohen 23 PDA 115 ...............................................................

 

 

309

Gooding v. Edlow [1966] Que. SC 436.................................................

 

255, 279

Gower v. London Borough of Barnet [1999] ELR 356 ..........................

145, 152

Gower v. London Borough of Bromley [1999] ELR 356........................

340, 344

Griswold v. Connecticut 381 US 479 (1965).................................................

 

377

Guerra v. Italy (1998) 26 EHRR 357 ...........................................................

 

 

154

Haifa Chemicals Inc. v. The Histadrut 30 PDA 216.....................................

311

Halford v. UK (1997) 24 EHRR 523............................................................

 

 

156

Hall v. Potter (1695) Shaw Parl. Cas. 76; 1 ER 52 (HL)................................

267

Hanington v. Du-Chatel (1781) 1 Bro. CC 125, 28 ER 1028 .........................

269

Harrison v. Carswell (1975) 62 DLR (3d) 68 .................................

237, 238, 239

Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit District (1970) 465 P 2d 61

(Cal.) .....................................................................................................

 

 

372

Herut v. National Labour Court in Jerusalem 31(3) PD 124 ..........................

37

Hill v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 All ER 238;

 

[1989] AC 53.................................

143, 144, 146, 150, 335, 336, 337, 341, 344

Hill v. Church of Scientology [1995] 2 SCR 1130; (1995) 126 DLR

 

(4th) 129 (SCC).............................................

 

19, 20, 45, 48, 54, 64, 65, 71, 74

Histadrut v. The State of Israel (unpublished, 2000)....................................

311

Histadrut v. Zim (unpublished, 2000)

.........................................................

 

310

Hohenzollern, OLG 19 August 1997, [1998] FamRZ 260......................

120, 121

 

Table of Cases

xvii

Holland v. Lampen-Wolfe [2000] 1 WLR 1573 ....................................

 

 

340, 341

Holomisa v. Argus Newspapers Ltd [1996] 2 SA 588 (W) ..............................

 

 

89

Home Office v. Dorset Yacht Co Ltd [1970] AC 1004 .................................

 

 

335

Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse (1990) 920 F 2d 967, 980 ................................

 

 

291

Horn & Leibobitz Inc. v. Histadrut (unpublished, 2000) .............................

 

 

311

Horvath v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000]

 

 

3 WLR 379 .............................................................................................

 

 

340

Horwood v. Millar’s Timber and Trading Co [1917] KB 305 ......

37, 62, 64, 224

H.R. Moch Co v. Rensselaer Water Co (1928) 159 NE 896..........................

 

222

Hughes v. UK (1986) 48 DR 258 .................................................................

 

 

153

Hunter v. Canary Wharf [1997] 2 All ER 426 ..............................................

 

 

154

Indor v. Mayor of Jerusalem 45(4) PD 83 .....................................................

 

 

32

James v. UK (1986) 8 EHRR 123 ................................................................

 

 

158

Jarvis v. Hampshire County Council [2000] 2 FCR 310 ...............................

 

 

340

“Jerusalem Community” Funeral Society v. Lionel Aryeh Kestenbaum 46

 

(2) PD 464 .....................................................................

28, 36, 182, 183, 194

Joanna Yechiel v. Palestine Post (unpublished, 1993) ..................................

 

 

310

John v. Mirror Group Newspapers [1996] 2 All ER 35 ................................

 

 

135

Johnson v. Calvert (1993) 851 P 2d 776 (Cal SC) ........................................

 

 

194

Johnson v. Sparrow (1899) 15 Que. SC 104 .................................................

 

 

278

Jones v. Randall (1774) 98 ER 954, 955 .......................................................

 

 

270

Jones v. Secretary of State for Employment [1989] QB 1..............................

 

 

145

Jordan House v. Menow (1973) 38 DLR (3d) 105..........................................

 

 

49

JS v. UK, 3 January 1973 ............................................................................

 

 

140

Kahana v. Havaad Hamnahel Shel Reshut Hashidur 41(3) PD 225

32

Katun v. UK (1998) 26 EHRR CD 212 ........................................................

 

 

154

Keegan v. Ireland, Series A Nr 290; [1995] EuGRZ 113 ........................

 

 

169, 170

Kent v. Griffiths [2000] 2 All ER 474....................................................

 

 

340, 348

Key v. Bradshaw (1689) 2 Vern. 102, 23 ER 675 .........................................

 

 

267

Keyishian v. Board of Regents 385 US 589 (1967) .......................................

 

 

376

Khoo Sit Hoh v. Lim Thean Tong (1912) AC 323 ................................

 

 

121, 125

King v. Barclay’s Motel (1961) 25 WWR (NS) 240 ......................................

 

 

278

Kinsella v. Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire, The Times, 5 May ....1999

342

Kirkham v. the Chief Constable of Manchester [1989] 2 QB 283 .................

 

146

Kline v. Ansell 414 A 2d. 929 (Md SC, 1980) .................................................

 

 

62

Knightley v. Johns [1982] 1 All ER 301 .......................................................

 

 

146

L and P v. Reading Borough Council, unreported, CA,

 

 

 

12 March 2001 ................................................................................

 

 

340, 343

Laird v. Tatum 408 US 1 (1972) ..................................................................

 

 

376

Lamond v. Richard and the Gordon Hotels, Ltd [1897] 1 QB 541

................

232

xviii Table of Cases

 

 

Lamont v. Postmaster General 381 US 301 (1965) .......................................

 

376

Lane v. Cotton (1701) 12 Mod. 472.............................................................

 

230

Lasserson v. Workers Housing Inc 38(2) PD 237 ..........................................

 

33

Lavon v. MTM Constructions For Industry and Craft Inc. 32 PDA 584

.......309

Letton v. Godden (1866) LR 2 Eq. 122 ........................................................

 

231

Leiningen[1996] BayObLGZ 204; [2000] FamRZ 380, 385....................

 

118, 119

LG Arnsberg, 15 April 1991 [1992] NJW-RR 9 ...........................................

 

171

LG Karlsruhe, 11 April 1991 [1991] NJW-RR 1163 .....................................

 

171

LG Koblenz, 24 June 1991 [1991] NJW-RR 1162 ........................................

 

171

LG Zweibrücken, 3 June 1996 [1997] FamRZ 633.......................................

 

170

Lloyd Corp, Ltd v. Tanner 407 US 551 (1972) .............................................

 

237

Lloyds Bank v. Bundy [1975] 1 QB 326 .......................................................

 

218

Lochner v. New York 198 US 45 (1905) ......................................................

 

288

Loew’s Theatres v. Reynolds (1921) 30 Que. KB 459,....................245, 250, 278

Lonrho v. Tebbit [1991] 4 All ER 973 ..................................................

 

141, 142

Lopez-Ostra v. Spain (1994) 20 EHRR 277, ........................................154, 155

Lumley v. Wagner (1852) 1 De G M & 604, 42 ER 687 ...............................

 

291

Lüth (1958) 7 BVerfGE 198 .............................................

44, 106, 107, 115, 163

M v. Newham London Borough Council [1995] 3 All ER 353 ..............

147, 152

McCarthy v. Wellington City [1996] NZLR 481 ...........................................

 

70

McFarlane v. Taysid Health Board [1999] 3 WLR 1301...............................

 

353

McNally v. M&G Media (Pty) Ltd [1997] 4 SA 267 (W) ...............................

 

90

Marc Rich & Co AG v. Bishop Rock Marine Co Ltd (The Nicholas H)

[1996] AC 211 ........................................................................................

 

346

Marckx v. Belgium (1979) 2 EHRR 330 ................................

133, 139, 157, 166

Markt Intern Verlag GmbH & Klaus Beerman, Series A Nr 165 (ECtHR),

20 Nov. 1989...................................................................................

 

173, 174

Marsh v. Alabama 326 US 501 (1945) ..........................................

237, 240, 241

Mary Clark, 1 Blackf. 122 (Ind, 1821) .........................................................

 

289

Menorah v. The Estate of Mosh Tamar (dec.) CA 686/97............................

 

371

Messenger v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co 37 NJL 531 ..................................

 

252

Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd v. Cosgrove 27 January 1992,

 

unreported .............................................................................................

 

135

Miller, Re [1938] SCR 1 .............................................................................

 

271

Mitchel v. Reynolds (1711) 24 ER 347.........................................................

 

267

Mitrani v. Minister of Transportation 37 (3) PD 337 ....................................

 

17

Moore v. Regents of the University of California (1990) 271 Cal. Rptr. 146,

(1990) 793 P. 2d 479,...............................................................................194

Munn v. Illinois 94 US 113 (1876) (US Sup. Ct.) ...................................

 

229, 231

Murphy v. Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 AC 398 ......................

 

346, 352

National Media Ltd v. Bogoshi [1948]4 SA 1196 (SCA).................................

 

95

Neethling v. Du Preez ..................................................................................

 

90

 

Table of Cases xix

Neethling v. The Weekly Mail [1994] 1 SA 708 (A) .......................................

90

Neville v. Dominion of Canada News Co [1915] 3 KB 556 ............................

37

Nevo v. National Labour Court 44(4) PD 749...............................................

 

37

New Jersey v. Schmid (1980) 423 A 2d 615...........................................

 

240, 241

New York Times v. Sullivan 376 US 1 (1948) ................................................

 

26

Newspapers v. Keys [1980] IRLR 247 .........................................................

 

135

Noble and Wolfe, Re [1949] 4 DLR 375 (Ont CA) ........................................

63

Noble and Wolfe v. Alley [1951] 1 DLR 321 (SCC); [1951] SCR 54

(SCC) .................................................................................

63, 227, 255, 258

OLG Celle,, 5 December 1947 [1948] Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht

174.........................................................................................................

 

126

OLG Karlruhe, 24 June 1992 [1992] BRAK-Mitt 226...................................

172

Osman v. Ferguson [1993] 4 All ER 344 ........................

144, 332, 333, 334, 335,

336, 339, 340, 341, 342, 345, 347, 348, 355

Osman v. United Kingdom [1999] FLR 193;(1998) 5 BHRC 293 ......

8, 133, 139,

145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 182, 332, 333, 334, 336,

337, 338, 339, 340, 342, 343, 344, 345, 348, 352, 353, 354, 355

Pakendorf v. De Flamingh [1982] 3 SA 146 (A) ........................................

 

90, 95

Palestine Post v. Joanna Yechiel 27 PDA 436 ..............................................

 

310

Palmer v. Tees Health Authority (2000) 2 LGLR 69; Lloyd’s Rep.

 

Med. 351.....................................................

149, 152, 338, 340, 343, 346, 352

Panesar v. Nestlé [1980] ICR 144 ................................................................

 

135

Parsons v. Thompson (1790) 1 HBl 322, 126 ER 190 ............................

268, 270

Patel v. Ali [1984] Ch. 283 ..........................................................................

 

157

People v. Budd (1889) 117 NY 1 (NY CA)...................................................

 

229

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of SA: in re ex parte President

of the RSA and others [2000] 2 SA 674 (CC)..............................................

 

95

Phelps v. Hillingdon London Borough Council [2000]

 

3 WLR 776...............................................................................

 

340, 348, 353

Ploof v. Putnam 81 Vt 471, 71 Atl 188 (1908) ..............................................

 

253

Pnidar v. Castro 37(4) PD 673 ......................................................................

 

33

Power v. Moss (1987) 61 Nfld & PEI Rep. 5 .................................................

 

62

Printing & Numerical Co v. Sampson (1975) LR 19 Eq 462 .....................

2, 184

Prugnell v. Gosse (1648) Allen 67, 82 ER 919...............................................

 

267

Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins 447 US 74 (1980) ..............................

237

Pudmaskey v. Attorney General 6 PD 341.....................................................

 

28

Quong Wing v. The King (1914) 49 Sup. Ct. Rep. 440...................................

62

R. v. Barak (Alexander) (1985) 7 CR App. R. (S) 404 .............................

64, 206

R. v. Dyment [1988] 2 SCR 417 ....................................................................

 

66

R. v. Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith [1996] QB 517.............................

156

xx Table of Cases

 

 

 

R. v. Morgentaler [1988] 1 SCR 30 ...............................................................

 

 

69

R. v. Oakes (1986) 26 DLR (4th) 200 ............................................................

 

 

72

R. v. Peters (1971) 17 DLR (3d) 128.......................................................

 

 

60, 239

R. v. Rahey [1987] 1 SCR 588.......................................................................

 

 

26

Rantzen v. Mirror Group Newspapers [1994] QB 670 .................................

 

135

Raviv v. Beit Yules 37(1) PD 533 ..................................................................

 

 

33

Rayner v. UK (1986) 47 DR 5 .....................................................................

 

 

154

Rekanat v. National Labour Court 51(3) PD 289.....................................

 

37, 38

Reno v. Condon 528 US 141, 120 S Ct 666 (2000) ........................................

 

383

Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 580 v.

 

 

Dolphin Delivery Ltd [1986] 2SCR 573; (1987) 33 DLR

 

 

(4th) 174................................................

19, 43, 44, 45, 46, 51, 57, 62, 74, 182

Rigby v. Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 986

............146

Rivett-Carnac v. Wiggins [1997] 3 SA 80 (C).................................................

 

90

Roe v. Wade 410 US 113 (1973) ...........................................................

 

 

236, 376

Rogers v. Clarence Hotel (1940) 2 WWR 545 ..............................................

 

278

Rogers v. Elliott 15 NE 768 (Mass. SJC, 1888) ..............................................

 

70

Rogers v. Parrey (1613) Bulst 136, 80 ER 1012.............................................

 

267

Rondel v. Worsley [1969] 1 AC 191 ............................................................

 

 

152

Rothfield v. North British Railway Co [1920] SC 805...........................

 

232, 235

Rowling v. Takaro [1988] AC 473 ..............................................................

 

 

141

S v. Gloucestershire County Council [2001] 3 All ER 346 ..............

340, 345, 348

Sahar Insurance v. Elhadad CA 5557/95, 51 (2) PD 724................................

 

368

Saif Ali v. Sydney Mitchell & Co. [1980] AC 198 ........................................

 

152

Sarusi v. The National Labour Court 52 (4) PD 817 ....................................

 

307

Saumur v. City of Quebec [1953] 4 DLR 641.................................................

 

43

Saunders v. Edwards [1987] 2 All ER 651....................................................

 

 

153

Sealey v. Tandy [1902] 1 KB 296 .................................................................

 

 

262

Shaked v. The Jewish Agency (unpublished, 1998) ......................................

 

309

Sharam Inc Spokesperson v. Globus Inc 25 PDA 395.....................................

 

35

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948) 334 US 1 ...........................................

 

26, 27, 227, 252

Shkwarchuk v. Hansen (1984) 34 Sask. Rep. 211...........................................

 

62

Smith & Grady v. UK (1999) 29 EHRR 493

................................................

 

156

Smith v. Gould (1707) 2 L Ld. Raym. 1275; 92 ER 338 ..................

224, 262, 263

Somerset v. Stewart (1972) Lofft 1; 98 ER 499.................................................

 

2

Sommersett’s Case (1772) 20 St Tr 179-80............................................

 

 

262, 263

Spencer v. UK (1998) 25 EHRR CD 105 ......................................................

 

 

141

Stovin v. Wise [1996] AC 923 ..............................................................

 

 

233, 343

Streeter v. Brogan, 113 NJ Super 486 (Ch Div 1971) ....................................

 

252

Stubbings v. UK (1993) 23 EHRR 213 .........................................................

 

 

155

Sumpter v. Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673 ............................................................

 

 

159

Sunday Times, 26 April 1979, Series A 30 [1979] EuGRZ 386 ......................

 

171

 

 

Table of Cases

xxi

Sutherland Shire Council v. Heyman (1985) 60 ALR 1 .........................

142, 233

Swinney v. Chief Constable of Northumbria [1997] QB 464;

 

[1996] 3 WLR 968 ......................................................

 

144, 146, 341, 343, 344

Takano v. Mitsubishi Jushi KK 27 Minshu 1536...........................................

 

24

Taylor v. Director of the Serious Fraud Office [1999] 2 AC 177 ...................

341

Tel-Aviv University v. Histadrut 30 PDA 385, .....................................309, 310

Thackwell v. Barclays Bank [1986] 1 All ER 676 .........................................

 

153

The Queen in the Right of Canada v. Saskatchewan Wheat Pool (1983)

 

143 DLR (3d) 9 (SCC) ..............................................................................

 

 

49

Tinsley v. Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340............................................................

 

 

153

Tipping v. St Helen’s Smelting Co (1863) B & S 608; 122 ER 588;

 

XI HLC 642; 11 ER 1483 ............................................................................

 

 

2

Toneguzzo-Norvell v. Savein (1994) 110 DLR (4th) 289 (SCC) ......................

62

TP and KM v. United Kingdom [2001] 2 FLR 549; [2001] 2 FCR 289;

 

[2001] Fam. Law 590 ....................................

47, 145, 149, 150, 151, 152, 331,

 

342, 344, 348, 352, 353, 354

Ulpaney Hastrata v. Geri 16(4) PD 2407 .......................................................

 

 

37

Uston v. Resorts Int’l Hotel, 89 NJ 163, 173 (1982) .....................................

 

252

Vincent v. Lake Erie Transportation Co 124 NW 222 (Minn. SC 1910)........

253

Vriend v. Alberta [1998] 1 SCR 493 ............................................................

 

 

246

W v. Essex County Council [2000] 1 WLR 601

.............................

340, 348, 354

Waters v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2000] 1 WLR 1607.....

340

Whalen v. Roe 429 US 589, 599-601 (1973)..................................................

 

 

373

White v. Jones [1995] 1 All ER 691 .............................................................

 

 

233

Whiteside v. UK (1994) 18 EHRR CD 126...................................................

 

 

141

Wilkinson v. Downton [1897] 2 QB 57 .........................................................

 

 

65

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co (1965) 350 F 2d 445 (DC Cir.) ....

286

Wilson v. First County Trust [2001] 2 WLR 302 .........................................

 

340

Winer v. UK (1986) 48 DR 154 ...................................................................

 

 

140

Workers Trust & Merchant Bank Ltd v. Dojap Investments Ltd [1993]

 

AC 573...................................................................................................

 

 

158

X v. Bedfordshire County Council [1995] 3 All ER 353 ................

141, 145, 147,

 

 

152, 331, 355

X and Y v. Netherlands (1986) 8 EHRR 235 ........................................

 

133, 139

Yuen Kun-yeu v. Attorney General of Hong Kong [1988] AC 175 (PC)........

142

Z v. United Kingdom [2001] 2 FLR 612; [2001] 2 FLR 246;

 

10 BHRC 384 .............................................

145, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 331,

339, 343, 344, 348, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355

Соседние файлы в папке Учебный год 22-23